A comparative study of antibacterial potentials of leaf extracts of some selected trees from Benue State University Campus on Staphylococcus aureus AND Escherichia coli

F. Akpagher, Believe Amarachi Chituru, Abubakar Ibrahim Bawa, John Joel Iji, D. T. Shija, J. A. Bdliya, Abdulazis S Longwap
{"title":"A comparative study of antibacterial potentials of leaf extracts of some selected trees from Benue State University Campus on Staphylococcus aureus AND Escherichia coli","authors":"F. Akpagher, Believe Amarachi Chituru, Abubakar Ibrahim Bawa, John Joel Iji, D. T. Shija, J. A. Bdliya, Abdulazis S Longwap","doi":"10.53294/ijfstr.2024.7.1.0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Medicinal Plant with antimicrobial properties are of great significance in therapeutic treatments of disease caused by bacteria. Their antibacterial properties are due to compounds synthesized in their cell sap during secondary metabolism, their antibacterial activity has shown that plants represent a potential source of novel antibiotic prototypes. This study aims to investigate the antibacterial potential of three plant extracts on S. aureus and E. coli. Method: A comparative study of the antibacterial potentials of water and ethanolic leaf extracts of three plants, Parkia biglobosa, Khaya senegalensis and Daniellia oliveri, was carried out. Extracts at various regimes of concentrations, 0.2 g/ml, 0.4 g/ml, 0.6 g/ml, 0.8 g/ml and 1.0 g/ml were tested against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. The disc diffusion method of Kirby Bauer with slight modification was adapted in determining zones of inhibition. Statistical significance was considered at (p<0.05). Results: Ethanolic leaf extract of P. biglobosa recorded the highest zone of inhibition (20.0 mm) at 1.0 g/ml on S. aureus, while ethanolic leaf extract of D. oliveri had the least zone of inhibition (6.33 mm) at 0.2 g/ml on E. coli. K. senegalensis was most effective on E. coli with grand mean inhibitory effect of (13.33 mm and 12.13 mm) on ethanol and water extract respectively, while P. biglobosa was most effective on S. aureus with grand mean inhibitory effect of (13.00 mm and 12.47 mm) on ethanol and water extracts respectively. No significant difference in the grand mean inhibitory effect of the three plants on test bacterial or the type of solvent used. Conclusion: The three plants are potential useful antibacterial agents, inhibiting bacterial growth at all concentrations of the study.","PeriodicalId":199114,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Frontiers in Science and Technology Research","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Frontiers in Science and Technology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53294/ijfstr.2024.7.1.0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medicinal Plant with antimicrobial properties are of great significance in therapeutic treatments of disease caused by bacteria. Their antibacterial properties are due to compounds synthesized in their cell sap during secondary metabolism, their antibacterial activity has shown that plants represent a potential source of novel antibiotic prototypes. This study aims to investigate the antibacterial potential of three plant extracts on S. aureus and E. coli. Method: A comparative study of the antibacterial potentials of water and ethanolic leaf extracts of three plants, Parkia biglobosa, Khaya senegalensis and Daniellia oliveri, was carried out. Extracts at various regimes of concentrations, 0.2 g/ml, 0.4 g/ml, 0.6 g/ml, 0.8 g/ml and 1.0 g/ml were tested against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. The disc diffusion method of Kirby Bauer with slight modification was adapted in determining zones of inhibition. Statistical significance was considered at (p<0.05). Results: Ethanolic leaf extract of P. biglobosa recorded the highest zone of inhibition (20.0 mm) at 1.0 g/ml on S. aureus, while ethanolic leaf extract of D. oliveri had the least zone of inhibition (6.33 mm) at 0.2 g/ml on E. coli. K. senegalensis was most effective on E. coli with grand mean inhibitory effect of (13.33 mm and 12.13 mm) on ethanol and water extract respectively, while P. biglobosa was most effective on S. aureus with grand mean inhibitory effect of (13.00 mm and 12.47 mm) on ethanol and water extracts respectively. No significant difference in the grand mean inhibitory effect of the three plants on test bacterial or the type of solvent used. Conclusion: The three plants are potential useful antibacterial agents, inhibiting bacterial growth at all concentrations of the study.
贝努埃州立大学校园中一些选定树木的叶提取物对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌抗菌潜力的比较研究
导言:具有抗菌特性的药用植物在治疗由细菌引起的疾病方面具有重要意义。植物的抗菌特性是由于其细胞液在二次代谢过程中合成的化合物,其抗菌活性表明植物是新型抗生素原型的潜在来源。本研究旨在探讨三种植物提取物对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的抗菌潜力。研究方法对三种植物(Parkia biglobosa、Khaya senegalensis 和 Daniellia oliveri)的水和乙醇叶提取物的抗菌潜力进行了比较研究。测试了不同浓度(0.2 克/毫升、0.4 克/毫升、0.6 克/毫升、0.8 克/毫升和 1.0 克/毫升)的提取物对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的作用。在确定抑菌区时,采用了略加修改的 Kirby Bauer 盘扩散法。统计学意义为(P<0.05)。结果P. biglobosa 的乙醇叶提取物在 1.0 克/毫升时对金黄色葡萄球菌的抑制区最大(20.0 毫米),而 D. oliveri 的乙醇叶提取物在 0.2 克/毫升时对大肠杆菌的抑制区最小(6.33 毫米)。K. senegalensis 对大肠杆菌最有效,其乙醇提取物和水提取物的平均抑制效果分别为(13.33 毫米和 12.13 毫米),而 P. biglobosa 对金黄色葡萄球菌最有效,其乙醇提取物和水提取物的平均抑制效果分别为(13.00 毫米和 12.47 毫米)。三种植物对试验细菌的平均抑制效果与所用溶剂类型无明显差异。结论这三种植物是潜在的有用抗菌剂,在研究的所有浓度下都能抑制细菌生长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信