Analysis of Factors Determining Success in FFPE Based NGS Panel Testing For Lung & Ovarian Cancer

P. Bhattacharya, P. Bishop, D. Gokhale, S. Rowlston, B. Eggington, G. Burghel, H. Schlecht
{"title":"Analysis of Factors Determining Success in FFPE Based NGS Panel Testing For Lung & Ovarian Cancer","authors":"P. Bhattacharya, P. Bishop, D. Gokhale, S. Rowlston, B. Eggington, G. Burghel, H. Schlecht","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.29.24311158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The identification of oncogenic variants in both lung and ovarian cancer is central to personalised treatment. NGS approaches using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples are routinely implemented for variant detection, but optimisation of pre-analytic factors is critical for success. We performed a large multi-cohort retrospective audit assessing pre-analytic factors related to Qiagen in house custom designed NGS panel testing for lung (n=801 from 23 referring hospitals) and ovarian (n=882 from 85 referring hospitals) FFPE cancer samples, sequenced at the NHS Northwest Genomic Laboratory Hub (NWGLH). A further detailed analysis of a cohort of lung samples (n=461) submitted from a single high-volume referral centre was also undertaken. Overall NGS cohort success ranged from 74-85% with large variation amongst referring laboratories. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed DNA yield and quality to be significant predictors of NGS success (p<0.001) alongside sample type for lung (p=0.035) and use of macrodissection for ovarian (p=0.025). Univariate analysis revealed specific poor lung performance within biopsy samples and associated with number and length of core biopsy samples. Furthermore, excessive fixation time for lung cytology and ovarian samples was associated with NGS failure (p<0.05), with only 49.5% of lung endoscopic bronchial ultrasound (EBUS) cytology samples meeting existing local guidelines for fixation time <24 hours, with 2/3 of prolonged fixation samples being received in the lab the following day. Variation in key identified pre-analytic factors amongst referring centres and variable adherence to best practice guidelines is likely to be responsible for the wide variation in NGS success. Improved collaboration between NHS genomic hubs and referring pathology laboratories through the establishment of a regional interactive collaborative network, facilitating guideline sharing and assessing adherence to pre-analytic optimisation of sample collection and processing for genomic testing, is crucial to improve future NGS genomic cancer testing.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.29.24311158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The identification of oncogenic variants in both lung and ovarian cancer is central to personalised treatment. NGS approaches using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples are routinely implemented for variant detection, but optimisation of pre-analytic factors is critical for success. We performed a large multi-cohort retrospective audit assessing pre-analytic factors related to Qiagen in house custom designed NGS panel testing for lung (n=801 from 23 referring hospitals) and ovarian (n=882 from 85 referring hospitals) FFPE cancer samples, sequenced at the NHS Northwest Genomic Laboratory Hub (NWGLH). A further detailed analysis of a cohort of lung samples (n=461) submitted from a single high-volume referral centre was also undertaken. Overall NGS cohort success ranged from 74-85% with large variation amongst referring laboratories. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed DNA yield and quality to be significant predictors of NGS success (p<0.001) alongside sample type for lung (p=0.035) and use of macrodissection for ovarian (p=0.025). Univariate analysis revealed specific poor lung performance within biopsy samples and associated with number and length of core biopsy samples. Furthermore, excessive fixation time for lung cytology and ovarian samples was associated with NGS failure (p<0.05), with only 49.5% of lung endoscopic bronchial ultrasound (EBUS) cytology samples meeting existing local guidelines for fixation time <24 hours, with 2/3 of prolonged fixation samples being received in the lab the following day. Variation in key identified pre-analytic factors amongst referring centres and variable adherence to best practice guidelines is likely to be responsible for the wide variation in NGS success. Improved collaboration between NHS genomic hubs and referring pathology laboratories through the establishment of a regional interactive collaborative network, facilitating guideline sharing and assessing adherence to pre-analytic optimisation of sample collection and processing for genomic testing, is crucial to improve future NGS genomic cancer testing.
决定肺癌和卵巢癌基于 FFPE 的 NGS 小组测试成功与否的因素分析
鉴定肺癌和卵巢癌的致癌变异是个性化治疗的核心。使用福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织样本的 NGS 方法是变异检测的常规方法,但分析前因素的优化是成功的关键。我们进行了一项大型多队列回顾性审计,评估了与在英国国家医疗服务系统西北基因组实验室中心(NWGLH)对肺癌(样本数=801,来自 23 家转诊医院)和卵巢癌(样本数=882,来自 85 家转诊医院)FFPE 癌样本进行测序的 Qiagen 公司内部定制设计的 NGS 面板测试相关的分析前因素。此外,还对一个高容量转诊中心提交的肺部样本队列(n=461)进行了进一步的详细分析。NGS 队列的总体成功率为 74-85%,转诊实验室之间的差异很大。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,DNA 产量和质量是 NGS 成功率的重要预测因素(p<0.001),此外,肺部样本类型(p=0.035)和卵巢大切片的使用(p=0.025)也是重要预测因素。单变量分析表明,活检样本中肺部表现不佳与核心活检样本的数量和长度有关。此外,肺细胞学和卵巢样本的固定时间过长也与 NGS 失败有关(p<0.05),只有 49.5% 的肺内窥镜支气管超声(EBUS)细胞学样本符合当地现有的固定时间小于 24 小时的指导原则,2/3 固定时间过长的样本在第二天才送到实验室。转诊中心之间已确定的主要分析前因素存在差异,对最佳实践指南的遵守情况也不尽相同,这可能是导致 NGS 成功率差异巨大的原因。通过建立区域互动协作网络,加强国家医疗服务系统基因组中心与转诊病理实验室之间的协作,促进指南共享,评估分析前优化样本采集和基因组测试处理的遵守情况,对于改善未来的 NGS 癌症基因组测试至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信