A community center to mobilize public policies and human rights in mental health: “the door is always open”

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Felipe Agudelo-Hernández, Jhasny Moreno-Reales, Lauta Inés Plata-Casas
{"title":"A community center to mobilize public policies and human rights in mental health: “the door is always open”","authors":"Felipe Agudelo-Hernández, Jhasny Moreno-Reales, Lauta Inés Plata-Casas","doi":"10.1108/jpmh-03-2024-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to describe the perceptions of some participants from a community mental health center in the Department of Chocó, Colombia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA case study with a qualitative approach was carried out in 2023. Focus groups were conducted with mental health leaders and members of a community mental health center. The data were analyzed using a thematic analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nTwo categories emerged: characterize the Community Mental Health Center of Chocó and Reaffirm human rights. In the first category, the community center is described as a place of recovery that mobilizes social services and works to increase agency capacity. In the second category, the human rights were assumed as part of community services, not only to eliminate coercive practices but also to support the increase of autonomy.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe limitations of this study are the analysis of strategies from the perspective of global politics, without delving into the structure of community actions themselves, which are not necessarily based on global recommendations.\n\n\nPractical implications\nDespite the design and development of public policies the study of their implementation still poses several challenges. The strategies carried out by regions that follow evidence-based practices and participation routes are not officially recognized as good practices in mental health and, therefore, independently supported to be sustained.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nA community mental health center is described that manages to be implement and deliver a service despite not being able to be financed by current national regulations. This indicates, apart from a need, the capacity of the regions to build their solutions beyond regulations.\n","PeriodicalId":45601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-03-2024-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to describe the perceptions of some participants from a community mental health center in the Department of Chocó, Colombia. Design/methodology/approach A case study with a qualitative approach was carried out in 2023. Focus groups were conducted with mental health leaders and members of a community mental health center. The data were analyzed using a thematic analysis. Findings Two categories emerged: characterize the Community Mental Health Center of Chocó and Reaffirm human rights. In the first category, the community center is described as a place of recovery that mobilizes social services and works to increase agency capacity. In the second category, the human rights were assumed as part of community services, not only to eliminate coercive practices but also to support the increase of autonomy. Research limitations/implications The limitations of this study are the analysis of strategies from the perspective of global politics, without delving into the structure of community actions themselves, which are not necessarily based on global recommendations. Practical implications Despite the design and development of public policies the study of their implementation still poses several challenges. The strategies carried out by regions that follow evidence-based practices and participation routes are not officially recognized as good practices in mental health and, therefore, independently supported to be sustained. Originality/value A community mental health center is described that manages to be implement and deliver a service despite not being able to be financed by current national regulations. This indicates, apart from a need, the capacity of the regions to build their solutions beyond regulations.
一个动员心理健康方面的公共政策和人权的社区中心:"大门永远为您敞开
本研究旨在描述哥伦比亚乔科省一家社区心理健康中心的一些参与者的看法。设计/方法/途径 2023 年,我们采用定性方法开展了一项案例研究。与心理健康领导者和社区心理健康中心的成员进行了焦点小组讨论。研究结果出现了两个类别:乔科社区心理健康中心的特点和重申人权。在第一个类别中,社区中心被描述为一个康复场所,它动员社会服务并努力提高机构能力。研究的局限性/影响本研究的局限性在于从全球政治的角度对战略进行分析,而没有深入研究社区行动本身的结构,因为社区行动并不一定以全球建议为基础。尽管设计和制定了公共政策,但对其实施情况的研究仍面临着一些挑战。各地区实施的战略遵循循证实践和参与路线,但并未被官方认可为精神健康方面的良好实践,因此需要得到独立支持才能持续下去。除需求外,这还表明各地区有能力制定超越法规的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Mental Health
Journal of Public Mental Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信