Board gender diversity, audit quality, and the moderating role of political connections: evidence from the Gulf Co-operation Council Countries (GCC)

Abiot Tessema, Ammad Ahmed, M. K. Zahir-ul-Hassan
{"title":"Board gender diversity, audit quality, and the moderating role of political connections: evidence from the Gulf Co-operation Council Countries (GCC)","authors":"Abiot Tessema, Ammad Ahmed, M. K. Zahir-ul-Hassan","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-11-2023-0286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine the influence of board gender diversity on audit quality demand, considering auditor choice and audit efforts within the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) countries. It further examines the role of political connections and the impact of gender equality policy initiatives on this relationship.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nFixed-effects regression models are employed in a sample of 1,822 firm-year observations for financial firms across the GCC from 2011–2022 to test the hypotheses. Moreover, the two-stage-least-squares and the propensity score matching methods are used for sensitivity analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study shows a negative relationship between board gender diversity and the demand for audit quality, reflected auditor choice and audit efforts. However, the study shows a positive association between firm’s political connections and audit quality demand, which is more pronounced in gender-diverse boards. Policy initiatives for gender equality show no significant effect on the relationship between board gender diversity and audit quality demand.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe results inform governments, policy-makers, regulatory authorities and corporations by providing new evidence on the relationship between board gender diversity and the demand for audit quality, as well as the moderating role of political connections and policy initiatives in this relationship. To promote the meaningful participation of female directors in board decision-making, the findings indicate that gender stereotypes, both explicit and implicit, that can hinder female directors’ influence in board decision-making need to be addressed. Second, the study underscores for governments, policy-makers regulatory authorities and corporations that the mere appointment of female directors does not necessarily ensure their engagement in board decision-making. The appointment of female directors should go beyond symbolism and translate into meaningful engagement and influence with the board.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to the corporate governance literature by offering new insights on the link between board gender diversity and the demand for audit quality. Beyond confirming a negative relationship between board gender diversity and the demand for quality audit, this study provides new insights on the moderating role of a firm’s political connections on this relationship. In addition, existing studies are primarily based on firms in Western countries and cannot be generalized due to differences in governance and legal structures. Given that the GCC countries have different cultures, economies, institutions, governance practices and norms compared to developed and emerging countries, our study offers a pertinent discussion on the relationship between board gender diversity and the demand for audit quality, as well as the moderating role of political connections in this relationship in the GCC countries.\n","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"8 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-11-2023-0286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the influence of board gender diversity on audit quality demand, considering auditor choice and audit efforts within the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) countries. It further examines the role of political connections and the impact of gender equality policy initiatives on this relationship. Design/methodology/approach Fixed-effects regression models are employed in a sample of 1,822 firm-year observations for financial firms across the GCC from 2011–2022 to test the hypotheses. Moreover, the two-stage-least-squares and the propensity score matching methods are used for sensitivity analysis. Findings The study shows a negative relationship between board gender diversity and the demand for audit quality, reflected auditor choice and audit efforts. However, the study shows a positive association between firm’s political connections and audit quality demand, which is more pronounced in gender-diverse boards. Policy initiatives for gender equality show no significant effect on the relationship between board gender diversity and audit quality demand. Practical implications The results inform governments, policy-makers, regulatory authorities and corporations by providing new evidence on the relationship between board gender diversity and the demand for audit quality, as well as the moderating role of political connections and policy initiatives in this relationship. To promote the meaningful participation of female directors in board decision-making, the findings indicate that gender stereotypes, both explicit and implicit, that can hinder female directors’ influence in board decision-making need to be addressed. Second, the study underscores for governments, policy-makers regulatory authorities and corporations that the mere appointment of female directors does not necessarily ensure their engagement in board decision-making. The appointment of female directors should go beyond symbolism and translate into meaningful engagement and influence with the board. Originality/value This study contributes to the corporate governance literature by offering new insights on the link between board gender diversity and the demand for audit quality. Beyond confirming a negative relationship between board gender diversity and the demand for quality audit, this study provides new insights on the moderating role of a firm’s political connections on this relationship. In addition, existing studies are primarily based on firms in Western countries and cannot be generalized due to differences in governance and legal structures. Given that the GCC countries have different cultures, economies, institutions, governance practices and norms compared to developed and emerging countries, our study offers a pertinent discussion on the relationship between board gender diversity and the demand for audit quality, as well as the moderating role of political connections in this relationship in the GCC countries.
董事会性别多样性、审计质量和政治关系的调节作用:来自海湾合作委员会国家(GCC)的证据
目的 本研究旨在考察董事会性别多样性对审计质量要求的影响,同时考虑海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家的审计师选择和审计工作。设计/方法/途径采用固定效应回归模型,以 2011-2022 年海湾合作委员会金融公司的 1822 个公司年观测数据为样本,对假设进行检验。研究结果研究表明,董事会性别多样性与审计质量需求、审计师选择和审计工作之间存在负相关关系。然而,研究表明,公司的政治关系与审计质量需求之间存在正相关,这在性别多元化的董事会中更为明显。研究结果为政府、政策制定者、监管机构和企业提供了新的证据,说明了董事会性别多样性与审计质量需求之间的关系,以及政治关系和政策措施在这一关系中的调节作用。为了促进女性董事有意义地参与董事会决策,研究结果表明,需要解决可能阻碍女性董事在董事会决策中发挥影响力的显性和隐性性别刻板印象。其次,本研究向政府、政策制定者、监管机构和企业强调,仅仅任命女性董事并不一定能确保她们参与董事会决策。女性董事的任命应超越象征意义,转化为对董事会有意义的参与和影响。 原创性/价值 本研究对董事会性别多元化与审计质量要求之间的联系提出了新的见解,为公司治理文献做出了贡献。除了证实董事会性别多样性与审计质量需求之间存在负相关关系外,本研究还就公司的政治关系对这一关系的调节作用提供了新的见解。此外,现有研究主要基于西方国家的公司,由于治理和法律结构的差异,不能一概而论。鉴于海湾合作委员会国家与发达国家和新兴国家相比具有不同的文化、经济、制度、治理实践和规范,我们的研究对海湾合作委员会国家董事会性别多样性与审计质量需求之间的关系以及政治关系在这种关系中的调节作用进行了中肯的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信