Oil spill response strategies: A comparative conceptual study between the USA and Nigeria

Adindu Donatus, Adindu Donatus Ogbu, Williams Ozowe, Augusta Heavens Ikevuje
{"title":"Oil spill response strategies: A comparative conceptual study between the USA and Nigeria","authors":"Adindu Donatus, Adindu Donatus Ogbu, Williams Ozowe, Augusta Heavens Ikevuje","doi":"10.30574/gscarr.2024.20.1.0262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a comprehensive review of oil spill response strategies in the United States and Nigeria, aiming to dissect the effectiveness, challenges, and policy frameworks governing environmental disaster management in the context of oil spills. Through an exhaustive literature review, the paper compares and contrasts the approaches adopted by these two countries, highlighting the interplay of technological, regulatory, and socio-economic factors in shaping their response mechanisms. The United States is portrayed as having a robust, technologically advanced, and well-coordinated response strategy, underpinned by stringent regulatory frameworks and significant investment in research and development. This comprehensive approach facilitates rapid containment and mitigation of spills, minimizing environmental and socio-economic impacts. Conversely, Nigeria’s response strategy is characterized by several challenges, including regulatory loopholes, inadequate enforcement, insufficient technological resources, and a lack of preparedness that exacerbate the consequences of oil spills on the environment and local communities. Key findings emphasize the pivotal role of governance, technological readiness, and stakeholder collaboration in crafting effective oil spill response strategies. The comparative analysis reveals critical gaps in Nigeria’s oil spill response framework and suggests areas for improvement, such as strengthening legislation, enhancing technological capacity, and fostering international collaboration. Concluding, the paper underscores the necessity for policy reforms and strategic investments in Nigeria to elevate its oil spill response capabilities. Drawing insights from the U.S. experience, it advocates for a holistic approach that integrates advanced technologies, effective governance, and community engagement to mitigate the impacts of oil spills. This review contributes to the discourse on environmental management, offering a foundation for future research and policy development aimed at enhancing oil spill response strategies globally.","PeriodicalId":12791,"journal":{"name":"GSC Advanced Research and Reviews","volume":"8 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSC Advanced Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.20.1.0262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review of oil spill response strategies in the United States and Nigeria, aiming to dissect the effectiveness, challenges, and policy frameworks governing environmental disaster management in the context of oil spills. Through an exhaustive literature review, the paper compares and contrasts the approaches adopted by these two countries, highlighting the interplay of technological, regulatory, and socio-economic factors in shaping their response mechanisms. The United States is portrayed as having a robust, technologically advanced, and well-coordinated response strategy, underpinned by stringent regulatory frameworks and significant investment in research and development. This comprehensive approach facilitates rapid containment and mitigation of spills, minimizing environmental and socio-economic impacts. Conversely, Nigeria’s response strategy is characterized by several challenges, including regulatory loopholes, inadequate enforcement, insufficient technological resources, and a lack of preparedness that exacerbate the consequences of oil spills on the environment and local communities. Key findings emphasize the pivotal role of governance, technological readiness, and stakeholder collaboration in crafting effective oil spill response strategies. The comparative analysis reveals critical gaps in Nigeria’s oil spill response framework and suggests areas for improvement, such as strengthening legislation, enhancing technological capacity, and fostering international collaboration. Concluding, the paper underscores the necessity for policy reforms and strategic investments in Nigeria to elevate its oil spill response capabilities. Drawing insights from the U.S. experience, it advocates for a holistic approach that integrates advanced technologies, effective governance, and community engagement to mitigate the impacts of oil spills. This review contributes to the discourse on environmental management, offering a foundation for future research and policy development aimed at enhancing oil spill response strategies globally.
石油泄漏应对战略:美国和尼日利亚的概念比较研究
本文全面回顾了美国和尼日利亚的漏油应对战略,旨在剖析漏油环境灾难管理的有效性、挑战和政策框架。通过详尽的文献综述,本文对这两个国家所采用的方法进行了比较和对比,强调了技术、监管和社会经济因素在形成其应对机制方面的相互作用。美国被描绘成一个强大的、技术先进的和协调良好的应对战略,其基础是严格的监管框架和大量的研发投资。这种综合方法有助于快速遏制和缓解泄漏,最大限度地减少对环境和社会经济的影响。与此相反,尼日利亚的应对战略却面临着一些挑战,包括监管漏洞、执法不力、技术资源不足以及缺乏准备,这些都加剧了石油泄漏对环境和当地社区造成的后果。主要研究结果强调了治理、技术准备和利益相关者合作在制定有效的溢油应对战略中的关键作用。比较分析揭示了尼日利亚溢油应对框架中的关键差距,并提出了需要改进的领域,如加强立法、提高技术能力和促进国际合作。最后,本文强调尼日利亚有必要进行政策改革和战略投资,以提高其溢油应对能力。本文借鉴了美国的经验,主张采取综合方法,将先进技术、有效治理和社区参与结合起来,以减轻漏油事件的影响。本综述有助于环境管理方面的讨论,为今后旨在加强全球溢油应对战略的研究和政策制定奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信