“We Keep us Safe!”: Abolition Feminism as a Challenge to Carceral Feminist Responses to Gendered Violence

IF 7.2 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Brittany Pearl Battle, Amber Joy Powell
{"title":"“We Keep us Safe!”: Abolition Feminism as a Challenge to Carceral Feminist Responses to Gendered Violence","authors":"Brittany Pearl Battle, Amber Joy Powell","doi":"10.1177/08912432241263582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The well-known movement chant “we keep us safe” disrupts carceral logics that deem policing—and the criminal punishment system more broadly—as sites of public safety and protection from violence and instead situates the source of safety within the community. Nevertheless, activist calls for community-centered alternatives to harm and violence occur alongside increasing backlash from media, legislators, and community members alike, who assert that, while flawed, police remain crucial for public safety—claims grounded in carceral feminist approaches to violent crime. More specifically, supporters of police as the site of safety commonly raise concerns related to victims of gendered intimate partner and sexual violence. In this article, we draw on 131 interviews from two studies with community activists, antiviolence advocates (both within and outside the state), and survivors to examine how they make sense of abolition and transformative justice in relation to their own lives, their work, their communities, and the state. Although participants may not use the actual language, our findings highlight abolition feminism as the framework guiding their critiques of the criminal punishment system, their visions for safety, and the everyday nuances they identify in seeking responses to gendered harm and violence beyond policing.","PeriodicalId":48351,"journal":{"name":"Gender & Society","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432241263582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The well-known movement chant “we keep us safe” disrupts carceral logics that deem policing—and the criminal punishment system more broadly—as sites of public safety and protection from violence and instead situates the source of safety within the community. Nevertheless, activist calls for community-centered alternatives to harm and violence occur alongside increasing backlash from media, legislators, and community members alike, who assert that, while flawed, police remain crucial for public safety—claims grounded in carceral feminist approaches to violent crime. More specifically, supporters of police as the site of safety commonly raise concerns related to victims of gendered intimate partner and sexual violence. In this article, we draw on 131 interviews from two studies with community activists, antiviolence advocates (both within and outside the state), and survivors to examine how they make sense of abolition and transformative justice in relation to their own lives, their work, their communities, and the state. Although participants may not use the actual language, our findings highlight abolition feminism as the framework guiding their critiques of the criminal punishment system, their visions for safety, and the everyday nuances they identify in seeking responses to gendered harm and violence beyond policing.
"我们保证我们的安全!":废除奴隶制的女权主义是对监狱女权主义应对性别暴力的挑战
众所周知,"我们保证我们的安全 "这一运动口号打破了将警察--更广泛地说是刑事处罚系统--视为公共安全和保护人们免受暴力的场所的 "监禁逻辑",而是将安全的源泉置于社区之中。然而,活动家们呼吁以社区为中心来替代伤害和暴力的同时,来自媒体、立法者和社区成员的反弹也在不断增加,他们声称,尽管存在缺陷,但警察仍然是公共安全的关键--这些主张的基础是针对暴力犯罪的胴体女权主义方法。更具体地说,警察作为安全场所的支持者通常会提出与性别亲密伴侣暴力和性暴力受害者相关的问题。在这篇文章中,我们通过对社区活动家、反暴力倡导者(包括州内和州外)以及幸存者进行的两项研究的 131 次访谈,考察了他们是如何从自身生活、工作、社区和国家的角度来理解废除暴力和变革性正义的。尽管参与者可能不会使用实际的语言,但我们的研究结果强调了废除死刑的女权主义是指导她们批判刑事惩罚制度、实现安全愿景的框架,以及她们在寻求警务之外的性别伤害和暴力应对措施时所发现的日常细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gender & Society
Gender & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Gender & Society promotes feminist scholarship and the social scientific study of gender. Gender & Society publishes theoretically engaged and methodologically rigorous articles that make original contributions to gender theory. The journal takes a multidisciplinary, intersectional, and global approach to gender analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信