Lessons Learned From Ventilated and Proned Patients With COVID-19: A Multisite Retrospective Study to Identify Predictive Factors for Facial Pressure Injuries.

IF 1.4 Q3 NURSING
Jeanne Hlebichuk, Elissa Buck, Angeline L Brooker, Julie K Mackenzie, Meagan Bayless Cleary, Maharaj Singh, Mary Hook
{"title":"Lessons Learned From Ventilated and Proned Patients With COVID-19: A Multisite Retrospective Study to Identify Predictive Factors for Facial Pressure Injuries.","authors":"Jeanne Hlebichuk, Elissa Buck, Angeline L Brooker, Julie K Mackenzie, Meagan Bayless Cleary, Maharaj Singh, Mary Hook","doi":"10.1097/DCC.0000000000000654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients critically ill with COVID-19 develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) necessitating mechanical ventilation and proning. Although proning is lifesaving, it has been linked to the occurrence of facial pressure injuries (PIs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the incidence and use of prevention strategies and identify predictors of facial PIs in patients who received ventilator and proning treatments in COVID-designated intensive care units at 2 large quaternary medical centers in the Midwest.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study using data extracted from an electronic health record between October 2020 and February 2022. Demographics, clinical and care variables, and PI outcomes were analyzed to identify predictors of PI using logistic and Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort (N = 150) included patients from 2 units, unit a (n = 97) and unit b (n = 53) with a mean age of 60 years, with 68% identifying as male. Patients were vented for an average of 18 (SD, 16.2) days and proned for an average of 3 (SD, 2.5) days. Many (71%) died. Over half (56%) developed facial PI with a proning-exposure-adjusted incidence rate of 18.5%. Patients with PI were significantly different in several factors. Logistic regression showed predictors of PIs were duration of mechanical ventilation (in days; P = .02) and head turned (P = .01). Cox regression also identified head turn as predictive (P < .01), with Black/African American race as protective (P = .03).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Critically ill patients with COVID-19 receiving ventilator and proning therapy developed facial PIs despite the use of recommended prevention practices. Further research on effective PI prevention strategies is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46646,"journal":{"name":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many patients critically ill with COVID-19 develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) necessitating mechanical ventilation and proning. Although proning is lifesaving, it has been linked to the occurrence of facial pressure injuries (PIs).

Objectives: To evaluate the incidence and use of prevention strategies and identify predictors of facial PIs in patients who received ventilator and proning treatments in COVID-designated intensive care units at 2 large quaternary medical centers in the Midwest.

Method: This was a retrospective cohort study using data extracted from an electronic health record between October 2020 and February 2022. Demographics, clinical and care variables, and PI outcomes were analyzed to identify predictors of PI using logistic and Cox regression.

Results: The cohort (N = 150) included patients from 2 units, unit a (n = 97) and unit b (n = 53) with a mean age of 60 years, with 68% identifying as male. Patients were vented for an average of 18 (SD, 16.2) days and proned for an average of 3 (SD, 2.5) days. Many (71%) died. Over half (56%) developed facial PI with a proning-exposure-adjusted incidence rate of 18.5%. Patients with PI were significantly different in several factors. Logistic regression showed predictors of PIs were duration of mechanical ventilation (in days; P = .02) and head turned (P = .01). Cox regression also identified head turn as predictive (P < .01), with Black/African American race as protective (P = .03).

Discussion: Critically ill patients with COVID-19 receiving ventilator and proning therapy developed facial PIs despite the use of recommended prevention practices. Further research on effective PI prevention strategies is needed.

从 COVID-19 通气和俯卧位患者中汲取的经验教训:确定面部压力损伤预测因素的多站点回顾性研究。
背景:许多 COVID-19 重症患者会出现急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),必须进行机械通气和俯卧位。尽管俯卧撑可以挽救生命,但它与面部压力损伤(PIs)的发生有关:评估中西部地区两家大型四级医疗中心的 COVID 指定重症监护病房中接受呼吸机和俯卧位治疗的患者面部压力损伤的发生率和预防策略的使用情况,并确定面部压力损伤的预测因素:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用的是 2020 年 10 月至 2022 年 2 月期间从电子健康记录中提取的数据。利用逻辑回归和考克斯回归分析了人口统计学、临床和护理变量以及 PI 结果,以确定 PI 的预测因素:队列(N = 150)包括来自 2 个单位的患者,a 单位(n = 97)和 b 单位(n = 53),平均年龄为 60 岁,68% 的患者为男性。患者平均排气时间为 18 天(标准差为 16.2 天),平均留观时间为 3 天(标准差为 2.5 天)。许多患者(71%)死亡。半数以上(56%)的患者出现面部 PI,经俯卧位暴露调整后的发病率为 18.5%。PI 患者在多个因素上存在明显差异。Logistic 回归显示,PI 的预测因素是机械通气的持续时间(天数;P = 0.02)和头部转向(P = 0.01)。Cox 回归还发现头部转向具有预测作用(P < .01),而黑人/非洲裔美国人具有保护作用(P = .03):讨论:尽管使用了推荐的预防措施,但接受呼吸机和俯卧位治疗的 COVID-19 重症患者仍出现了面部 PI。需要进一步研究有效的 PI 预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing™ is to provide nurses with accurate, current, and relevant information and services to excel in critical care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信