Novel Systemic Inflammatory Markers Predict All-Cause Mortality in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-31 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2506202
Wen-Xin Zhao, Zhi-Yuan Wu, Ning Zhao, Yong-Peng Diao, Yong Lan, Yong-Jun Li
{"title":"Novel Systemic Inflammatory Markers Predict All-Cause Mortality in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.","authors":"Wen-Xin Zhao, Zhi-Yuan Wu, Ning Zhao, Yong-Peng Diao, Yong Lan, Yong-Jun Li","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2506202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinically useful predictors for risk stratification of long-term survival may assist in selecting patients for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) procedures. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic significance of peroperative novel systemic inflammatory markers (SIMs), including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SIII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), for long-term mortality in EVAR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 147 consecutive patients who underwent their first EVAR procedure at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital. The patients were divided into the mortality group (n = 37) and the survival group (n = 110). The receiver operating characteristic curves were used to ascertain the threshold value demonstrating the most robust connection with mortality. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed between each SIM and mortality. The relationship between SIMs and survival was investigated using restricted cubic splines and multivariate Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 147 patients, with an average follow-up duration of 34.28 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 22.95 months. Deceased patients showed significantly higher NLR (<i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001) and reduced HRR (<i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality were considerably greater in the higher-NLR group (NLR <math><mo>></mo></math> 2.77) and lower-HRR group (HRR <math><mo><</mo></math> 10.64). The hazard ratio (HR) of 0.833 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.71-0.97, <i>p</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.021) was determined to be statistically significant in predicting death in the multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative higher-NLR and lower-HRR have been associated with a lower long-term survival rate in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients undergoing elective EVAR. Multivariate Cox regression showed that decreased preoperative HRR is an independent risk factor that increases mortality risk following EVAR. SIMs, such as the NLR and HRR, could be used in future clinical risk prediction methodologies for AAA patients undergoing EVAR. However, additional prospective cohort studies are needed to identify these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2506202","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinically useful predictors for risk stratification of long-term survival may assist in selecting patients for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) procedures. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic significance of peroperative novel systemic inflammatory markers (SIMs), including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SIII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), for long-term mortality in EVAR.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 147 consecutive patients who underwent their first EVAR procedure at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital. The patients were divided into the mortality group (n = 37) and the survival group (n = 110). The receiver operating characteristic curves were used to ascertain the threshold value demonstrating the most robust connection with mortality. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed between each SIM and mortality. The relationship between SIMs and survival was investigated using restricted cubic splines and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Results: The study included 147 patients, with an average follow-up duration of 34.28 ± 22.95 months. Deceased patients showed significantly higher NLR (p < 0.001) and reduced HRR (p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality were considerably greater in the higher-NLR group (NLR > 2.77) and lower-HRR group (HRR < 10.64). The hazard ratio (HR) of 0.833 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.71-0.97, p < 0.021) was determined to be statistically significant in predicting death in the multivariable analysis.

Conclusions: Preoperative higher-NLR and lower-HRR have been associated with a lower long-term survival rate in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients undergoing elective EVAR. Multivariate Cox regression showed that decreased preoperative HRR is an independent risk factor that increases mortality risk following EVAR. SIMs, such as the NLR and HRR, could be used in future clinical risk prediction methodologies for AAA patients undergoing EVAR. However, additional prospective cohort studies are needed to identify these findings.

新型全身炎症标志物可预测接受血管内腹主动脉瘤修补术患者的全因死亡率
背景:临床上有用的长期生存风险分层预测指标有助于选择接受血管内腹主动脉瘤(EVAR)手术的患者。本研究旨在分析围手术期新型全身炎症指标(SIMs)对 EVAR 长期死亡率的预后意义,包括中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比值(HRR)、全身免疫炎症指数(SIII)和全身炎症反应指数(SIRI):对在北京医院血管外科接受首次 EVAR 手术的 147 例连续患者进行了回顾性分析。患者被分为死亡组(37 人)和存活组(110 人)。使用接收器操作特征曲线确定与死亡率关系最密切的阈值。对每种 SIM 与死亡率之间的关系进行了 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析。使用限制性立方样条和多变量 Cox 回归分析研究了 SIMs 与生存之间的关系:研究共纳入 147 名患者,平均随访时间为(34.28 ± 22.95)个月。死亡患者的 NLR 明显升高(P 0.001),HRR 明显降低(P 0.001)。高 NLR 组(NLR > 2.77)和低 HRR 组(HRR 10.64)的 Kaplan-Meier 估计死亡率明显更高。在多变量分析中,危险比(HR)为 0.833(95% 置信区间(95% CI):0.71-0.97,P 0.021),在预测死亡方面具有统计学意义:结论:在接受择期EVAR手术的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者中,术前较高的NLR和较低的HRR与较低的长期生存率有关。多变量 Cox 回归显示,术前 HRR 降低是增加 EVAR 术后死亡风险的独立风险因素。NLR 和 HRR 等 SIMs 可用于未来接受 EVAR 的 AAA 患者的临床风险预测方法。不过,还需要更多的前瞻性队列研究来确定这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信