One-to-one counselling and school attendance in the UK: a single group pre-post study.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Jennifer Saxton, Katalin Toth, Obioha C Ukoumunne, Hannah Wilkinson, Jemma White, Sarah Golden, Tamsin Ford
{"title":"One-to-one counselling and school attendance in the UK: a single group pre-post study.","authors":"Jennifer Saxton, Katalin Toth, Obioha C Ukoumunne, Hannah Wilkinson, Jemma White, Sarah Golden, Tamsin Ford","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Absence rates remain high in UK schools, with negative implications for attainment, life chances and inequality. Reasons for non-attendance are complex but include psychosocial factors. Few UK-based studies have evaluated psychosocial interventions for school attendance outcomes or its moderators. This pre-post evaluation examined the potential influence of school-based one-to-one counselling on school attendance and possible moderators.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Secondary analysis of routine data, collected by a national mental health provider in primary and secondary schools.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>7405 pupils aged 4-19 years, with complete school attendance records at Time1 (pre-counselling term) and Time2 (the term when counselling ended).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>All participants received school-based one-to-one counselling with a trained counsellor between August 2016 and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Percentage of school sessions attended (continuous) and persistent absence (binary; attending ≤90% of sessions) in a term. Potential moderators included sociodemographics, mental health and school engagement/enjoyment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median Time1 attendance was 96%. 23.6% of participants were persistently absent. The intervention was not associated with improved percentage attendance (0.028%, 95% CI -0.160-0.216%) but was associated with 18.5% reduced odds of persistent absence (OR=0.815, 95% CI 0.729-0.911). We identified five moderators of change in attendance (interaction terms p<0.05): age group (improvements for 4-9 s; worsening for 15-19 s), improvement for some ethnicities and lower parent/carer education. Mental health and school engagement/enjoyment co-varied with attendance in expected directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One-to-one counselling may improve school attendance among persistently absent pupils, particularly at younger ages. Improving mental health and pupil engagement/enjoyment are potential intervention targets. Our hypotheses require confirmation with controlled designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":"905-912"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Absence rates remain high in UK schools, with negative implications for attainment, life chances and inequality. Reasons for non-attendance are complex but include psychosocial factors. Few UK-based studies have evaluated psychosocial interventions for school attendance outcomes or its moderators. This pre-post evaluation examined the potential influence of school-based one-to-one counselling on school attendance and possible moderators.

Design and setting: Secondary analysis of routine data, collected by a national mental health provider in primary and secondary schools.

Participants: 7405 pupils aged 4-19 years, with complete school attendance records at Time1 (pre-counselling term) and Time2 (the term when counselling ended).

Intervention: All participants received school-based one-to-one counselling with a trained counsellor between August 2016 and December 2019.

Outcomes: Percentage of school sessions attended (continuous) and persistent absence (binary; attending ≤90% of sessions) in a term. Potential moderators included sociodemographics, mental health and school engagement/enjoyment.

Results: Median Time1 attendance was 96%. 23.6% of participants were persistently absent. The intervention was not associated with improved percentage attendance (0.028%, 95% CI -0.160-0.216%) but was associated with 18.5% reduced odds of persistent absence (OR=0.815, 95% CI 0.729-0.911). We identified five moderators of change in attendance (interaction terms p<0.05): age group (improvements for 4-9 s; worsening for 15-19 s), improvement for some ethnicities and lower parent/carer education. Mental health and school engagement/enjoyment co-varied with attendance in expected directions.

Conclusions: One-to-one counselling may improve school attendance among persistently absent pupils, particularly at younger ages. Improving mental health and pupil engagement/enjoyment are potential intervention targets. Our hypotheses require confirmation with controlled designs.

英国一对一辅导与入学率:单个小组的事前-事后研究。
目的:英国学校的旷课率居高不下,对学生的学习成绩、生活机会和不平等现象产生了负面影响。旷课的原因很复杂,其中包括社会心理因素。在英国,很少有研究对出勤率结果或其调节因素的社会心理干预进行评估。本研究对校本一对一辅导对入学率的潜在影响及其可能的调节因素进行了事后评估:由一家全国性心理健康服务机构在中小学收集的常规数据的二次分析:7405名4-19岁的学生,在时间1(辅导前的学期)和时间2(辅导结束的学期)有完整的出勤记录:所有参与者在2016年8月至2019年12月期间接受了由训练有素的辅导员提供的一对一校本辅导:在一个学期内参加学校课程的百分比(连续)和持续缺席(二元;参加课程的百分比≤90%)。潜在的调节因素包括社会人口学、心理健康和学校参与/乐趣:结果:时间 1 出勤率中位数为 96%。23.6%的参与者持续缺课。干预与出勤率的提高无关(0.028%,95% CI -0.160-0.216%),但与持续缺勤几率降低 18.5%有关(OR=0.815,95% CI 0.729-0.911)。我们发现了五种调节出勤率变化的因素(交互项 p 结论:一对一辅导可提高持续缺课学生的出勤率,尤其是低龄学生。改善心理健康和提高学生的参与度/愉悦度是潜在的干预目标。我们的假设需要通过对照设计来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
291
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信