First-attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate using a hyperangulated unchannelled videolaryngoscope vs. a channelled videolaryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult airway: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1111/anae.16389
Manuel Taboada, Jorge Fernández, Ana Estany-Gestal, Inma Vidal, Laura Dos Santos, Carmen Novoa, Alejandra Pérez, Javier Segurola, Edgar Franco, Julia Regueira, Paula Mirón, Rosa Sotojove, Julio Cortiñas, Agustín Cariñena, Marcos Peiteado, Alfonso Rodríguez, Teresa Seoane-Pillado
{"title":"First-attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate using a hyperangulated unchannelled videolaryngoscope vs. a channelled videolaryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult airway: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Manuel Taboada, Jorge Fernández, Ana Estany-Gestal, Inma Vidal, Laura Dos Santos, Carmen Novoa, Alejandra Pérez, Javier Segurola, Edgar Franco, Julia Regueira, Paula Mirón, Rosa Sotojove, Julio Cortiñas, Agustín Cariñena, Marcos Peiteado, Alfonso Rodríguez, Teresa Seoane-Pillado","doi":"10.1111/anae.16389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is uncertainty about the optimal videolaryngoscope for awake tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway. The use of channelled and unchannelled videolaryngoscopy has been reported, but there is a lack of evidence on which is the best option.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomised clinical trial to compare the efficacy of the C-MAC D-Blade® vs. Airtraq® in adult patients (aged ≥ 18 y) scheduled for elective or emergency surgery under general anaesthesia with anticipated difficult airway who required awake tracheal intubation under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation. The primary endpoint was the first-attempt tracheal intubation success rate. Secondary outcomes included the overall success rate; number of tracheal intubation attempts; Cormack and Lehane glottic view; level of difficulty (visual analogue score); patient discomfort (visual analogue score); and incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety patients (70/90 male (78%); mean (SD) age 65 (12) y) with anticipated difficult airways were randomly allocated to C-MAC D-Blade or Airtraq videolaryngoscopy. First-attempt successful tracheal intubation rate was higher in patients allocated to the C-MAC D-Blade group compared with those allocated to the Airtraq group (38/45 (84%) vs. 28/45 (62%), respectively; p = 0.006). The proportion of patients' tracheas that were intubated at the second and third attempt was 4/45 (9%) and 3/45 (7%) in those allocated to the C-MAC D-Blade group compared with 14/45 (31%) and 1/45 (2%) in those allocated to the Airtraq group (p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in overall tracheal intubation success rate (C-MAC D-Blade group 45/45 (100%) vs. Airtraq group 43/45 (96%), p = 0.494).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In patients with anticipated difficult airway, first-attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate was higher with the C-MAC D-Blade compared with Airtraq laryngoscopy. No difference was found between the two videolaryngoscopes in overall tracheal intubation success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16389","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is uncertainty about the optimal videolaryngoscope for awake tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway. The use of channelled and unchannelled videolaryngoscopy has been reported, but there is a lack of evidence on which is the best option.

Methods: We conducted a randomised clinical trial to compare the efficacy of the C-MAC D-Blade® vs. Airtraq® in adult patients (aged ≥ 18 y) scheduled for elective or emergency surgery under general anaesthesia with anticipated difficult airway who required awake tracheal intubation under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation. The primary endpoint was the first-attempt tracheal intubation success rate. Secondary outcomes included the overall success rate; number of tracheal intubation attempts; Cormack and Lehane glottic view; level of difficulty (visual analogue score); patient discomfort (visual analogue score); and incidence of complications.

Results: Ninety patients (70/90 male (78%); mean (SD) age 65 (12) y) with anticipated difficult airways were randomly allocated to C-MAC D-Blade or Airtraq videolaryngoscopy. First-attempt successful tracheal intubation rate was higher in patients allocated to the C-MAC D-Blade group compared with those allocated to the Airtraq group (38/45 (84%) vs. 28/45 (62%), respectively; p = 0.006). The proportion of patients' tracheas that were intubated at the second and third attempt was 4/45 (9%) and 3/45 (7%) in those allocated to the C-MAC D-Blade group compared with 14/45 (31%) and 1/45 (2%) in those allocated to the Airtraq group (p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in overall tracheal intubation success rate (C-MAC D-Blade group 45/45 (100%) vs. Airtraq group 43/45 (96%), p = 0.494).

Discussion: In patients with anticipated difficult airway, first-attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate was higher with the C-MAC D-Blade compared with Airtraq laryngoscopy. No difference was found between the two videolaryngoscopes in overall tracheal intubation success rate.

在预计气道困难的患者中使用超切口无通道视频喉镜与有通道视频喉镜的首次尝试清醒气管插管成功率:随机对照试验。
导言:对于预期气道困难的患者进行清醒气管插管的最佳视频咽喉镜尚无定论。有报告称使用了通道式和非通道式视频喉镜,但目前还缺乏证据证明哪种是最佳选择:我们进行了一项随机临床试验,以比较 C-MAC D-Blade® 与 Airtraq® 在成年患者(年龄≥ 18 岁)中的疗效,这些患者计划在全身麻醉下进行择期或急诊手术,预计会出现气道困难,需要在局部麻醉和有意识镇静下进行清醒气管插管。主要终点是首次尝试气管插管的成功率。次要结果包括总体成功率、气管插管尝试次数、Cormack 和 Lehane 声门视图、困难程度(视觉模拟评分)、患者不适感(视觉模拟评分)和并发症发生率:90 名预计气道困难的患者(70/90 名男性,占 78%;平均(标清)年龄 65(12)岁)被随机分配到 C-MAC D-Blade 或 Airtraq 视频喉镜检查。与 Airtraq 组相比,C-MAC D-Blade 组患者的首次气管插管成功率更高(分别为 38/45 (84%) 对 28/45 (62%);P = 0.006)。分配到 C-MAC D 刀组的患者在第二次和第三次尝试时气管插管的比例分别为 4/45 (9%)和 3/45 (7%),而分配到 Airtraq 组的患者分别为 14/45 (31%) 和 1/45 (2%)(p = 0.006)。总体气管插管成功率无明显差异(C-MAC D 刀组 45/45 (100%) vs. Airtraq 组 43/45 (96%),p = 0.494):讨论:在预计气道困难的患者中,C-MAC D 刀与 Airtraq 喉镜相比,首次尝试清醒气管插管的成功率更高。两种视频喉镜在总体气管插管成功率上没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信