Analyzing ligament prestrain in a multibody model of an ankle joint with random sampling.

Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2024-02-08 Print Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.37190/abb-02401-2024-01
Adam Ciszkiewicz
{"title":"Analyzing ligament prestrain in a multibody model of an ankle joint with random sampling.","authors":"Adam Ciszkiewicz","doi":"10.37190/abb-02401-2024-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: Modeling an ankle joint is a challenge, especially when considering complex phenomena such as prestrain. In the literature two main approaches to ligament prestrain can be found in ankle modeling. The first one assumes a strain-free configuration, effectively omitting the prestrain, while in the second one the slack lengths are obtained by shortening the ligament lengths in the rest configuration by 2%. These approaches were not compared directly in a controlled environment. <i>Methods</i>: The aim of the study to compare the two common approaches to ligament prestrain in ankle joint modeling. The approaches are compared on a collection of models generated by random sampling from a 6-link, 2-contact pair multibody model of the ankle. Random sampling includes perturbation of slack lengths, which makes the generated models prestrained and with known output characteristics. Their resemblance to the original model and the ankle joint makes them viable for using in a prestrain comparison. Each generated model is prestrain with the two approaches, then the outputs are compared to determine, which approach returns results closer to reality. <i>Results</i>: The comparison was performed on 592 generated models. On average, the strain-free approach significantly outperformed the 2% shortening. <i>Conclusions</i>: The method for testing prestrain proposed in the paper is an effectively tool for exploring the solution space of the model. The obtained results were interesting, but should be taken with caution as they are connected to the test condition. However, the method is general and could used with any other biomechanical model.</p>","PeriodicalId":519996,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":"25 4","pages":"3-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02401-2024-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Modeling an ankle joint is a challenge, especially when considering complex phenomena such as prestrain. In the literature two main approaches to ligament prestrain can be found in ankle modeling. The first one assumes a strain-free configuration, effectively omitting the prestrain, while in the second one the slack lengths are obtained by shortening the ligament lengths in the rest configuration by 2%. These approaches were not compared directly in a controlled environment. Methods: The aim of the study to compare the two common approaches to ligament prestrain in ankle joint modeling. The approaches are compared on a collection of models generated by random sampling from a 6-link, 2-contact pair multibody model of the ankle. Random sampling includes perturbation of slack lengths, which makes the generated models prestrained and with known output characteristics. Their resemblance to the original model and the ankle joint makes them viable for using in a prestrain comparison. Each generated model is prestrain with the two approaches, then the outputs are compared to determine, which approach returns results closer to reality. Results: The comparison was performed on 592 generated models. On average, the strain-free approach significantly outperformed the 2% shortening. Conclusions: The method for testing prestrain proposed in the paper is an effectively tool for exploring the solution space of the model. The obtained results were interesting, but should be taken with caution as they are connected to the test condition. However, the method is general and could used with any other biomechanical model.

利用随机抽样分析踝关节多体模型中的韧带预应变。
目的:踝关节建模是一项挑战,尤其是在考虑预应变等复杂现象时。在踝关节建模中,有两种处理韧带预应变的主要方法。第一种方法假定无应变配置,实际上省略了预应变,而第二种方法则通过将静止配置下的韧带长度缩短 2% 来获得松弛长度。这些方法并没有在受控环境中进行直接比较。研究方法本研究旨在比较踝关节建模中韧带预应变的两种常用方法。这两种方法的比较对象是从一个 6 连杆、2 对接触的踝关节多体模型中随机抽样生成的模型集合。随机取样包括对松弛长度的扰动,这使得生成的模型具有预紧力和已知的输出特性。这些模型与原始模型和踝关节相似,因此可用于预应变比较。使用两种方法对每个生成的模型进行预应变,然后比较输出结果,以确定哪种方法得到的结果更接近实际情况。结果:对生成的 592 个模型进行了比较。平均而言,无应变方法明显优于 2% 缩短方法。结论:文中提出的测试预应变的方法是探索模型求解空间的有效工具。获得的结果很有趣,但应谨慎对待,因为它们与测试条件有关。不过,该方法具有通用性,可用于任何其他生物力学模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信