{"title":"Heterogeneity or change in cell of origin in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas determined using hans algorithm","authors":"Akiko Miyagi Maeshima , Hirokazu Taniguchi , Yuka Takahashi , Yuto Kaimi , Tetsuro Ochi , Haruhi Makino , Shinichi Makita , Noriko Iwaki , Suguru Fukuhara , Wataru Munakata , Koji Izutsu","doi":"10.1016/j.humpath.2024.105630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to analyze the heterogeneity or change in cell of origin (COO) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCLs) using the Hans algorithm including 156 patients with multiple DLBCL specimens. COO was detected via immunohistochemical staining for CD10, BCL6, and MUM1. The COO of the main tumor at initial diagnosis was germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB type in 50 (32%) and 106 (68%) patients, respectively. It did not change in 126 patients (81%). However, it changed in 30 patients (19%), from GCB to non-GCB in 12 patients and vice versa in 18 patients. The COO was heterogeneous or changed in 14% of simultaneous samples at other sites during the initial diagnosis, in 7% of primary refractory sites, and in 20% of samples obtained in the relapse phase other than the primary site. Changes in CD10, BCL6, and MUM1 expression were observed in 15%, 23%, and 24% samples, respectively. A low incidence of change in COO was observed in DLBCL with CD10<sup>+</sup>/BCL6<sup>+</sup>/MUM1<sup>-</sup> (4%), CD10<sup>-</sup>/BCL6<sup>-</sup>/MUM1<sup>+</sup> (3%), and CD10<sup>-</sup>/BCL6<sup>-</sup>/MUM1<sup>-</sup> (0%) patterns, whereas DLBCL with other patterns showed COO changes at rates of 20–37%. In conclusion, COO was heterogeneous or changed in 19% of DLBCL cases. The COO should be re-examined in other biopsy samples to determine the optimal treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13062,"journal":{"name":"Human pathology","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 105630"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0046817724001394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the heterogeneity or change in cell of origin (COO) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCLs) using the Hans algorithm including 156 patients with multiple DLBCL specimens. COO was detected via immunohistochemical staining for CD10, BCL6, and MUM1. The COO of the main tumor at initial diagnosis was germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB type in 50 (32%) and 106 (68%) patients, respectively. It did not change in 126 patients (81%). However, it changed in 30 patients (19%), from GCB to non-GCB in 12 patients and vice versa in 18 patients. The COO was heterogeneous or changed in 14% of simultaneous samples at other sites during the initial diagnosis, in 7% of primary refractory sites, and in 20% of samples obtained in the relapse phase other than the primary site. Changes in CD10, BCL6, and MUM1 expression were observed in 15%, 23%, and 24% samples, respectively. A low incidence of change in COO was observed in DLBCL with CD10+/BCL6+/MUM1- (4%), CD10-/BCL6-/MUM1+ (3%), and CD10-/BCL6-/MUM1- (0%) patterns, whereas DLBCL with other patterns showed COO changes at rates of 20–37%. In conclusion, COO was heterogeneous or changed in 19% of DLBCL cases. The COO should be re-examined in other biopsy samples to determine the optimal treatment.
期刊介绍:
Human Pathology is designed to bring information of clinicopathologic significance to human disease to the laboratory and clinical physician. It presents information drawn from morphologic and clinical laboratory studies with direct relevance to the understanding of human diseases. Papers published concern morphologic and clinicopathologic observations, reviews of diseases, analyses of problems in pathology, significant collections of case material and advances in concepts or techniques of value in the analysis and diagnosis of disease. Theoretical and experimental pathology and molecular biology pertinent to human disease are included. This critical journal is well illustrated with exceptional reproductions of photomicrographs and microscopic anatomy.