The chimera of reaching a universal consensus on platelet-rich plasma treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a review of recent consensus statements and expert opinion.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1080/14712598.2024.2383865
Elizaveta Kon, Giuseppe Anzillotti, Pietro Conte, Luca Ruosi, Brian Cole, Jason Dragoo, Ken Zaslav, Rachel Frank, Laura De Girolamo, Bert Mandelbaum, Scott Rodeo, Maurilio Marcacci, Giuseppe Filardo, Berardo Di Matteo
{"title":"The chimera of reaching a universal consensus on platelet-rich plasma treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a review of recent consensus statements and expert opinion.","authors":"Elizaveta Kon, Giuseppe Anzillotti, Pietro Conte, Luca Ruosi, Brian Cole, Jason Dragoo, Ken Zaslav, Rachel Frank, Laura De Girolamo, Bert Mandelbaum, Scott Rodeo, Maurilio Marcacci, Giuseppe Filardo, Berardo Di Matteo","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2383865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent cause of disability worldwide, affecting millions and posing significant socioeconomic burdens. Various conservative measures like hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections aim to manage OA symptoms and delay surgical interventions. Despite the increasing utilization of PRP, consensus on its efficacy remains elusive, reflecting the evolving landscape of OA management.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This study reviews guidelines and recommendations on intra-articular PRP injections for OA globally, highlighting divergent perspectives among different medical societies. A comprehensive literature search identified 19 relevant guidelines, indicating a temporal and geographic evolution in attitudes toward PRP use. While some guidelines endorse PRP for mild-to-moderate OA, others express caution due to concerns about product standardization and clinical evidence heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The lack of universal consensus on PRP for OA underscores the complex interplay between clinical evidence, practice patterns, and evolving perspectives. Recent shifts toward endorsing PRP may reflect advancements in preparation techniques and personalized medicine approaches. However, challenges persist, including patient selection and product standardization. Efforts to develop consensus and refine PRP classification systems are essential for guiding clinical practice and advancing OA management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"827-833"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2383865","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent cause of disability worldwide, affecting millions and posing significant socioeconomic burdens. Various conservative measures like hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections aim to manage OA symptoms and delay surgical interventions. Despite the increasing utilization of PRP, consensus on its efficacy remains elusive, reflecting the evolving landscape of OA management.

Areas covered: This study reviews guidelines and recommendations on intra-articular PRP injections for OA globally, highlighting divergent perspectives among different medical societies. A comprehensive literature search identified 19 relevant guidelines, indicating a temporal and geographic evolution in attitudes toward PRP use. While some guidelines endorse PRP for mild-to-moderate OA, others express caution due to concerns about product standardization and clinical evidence heterogeneity.

Expert opinion: The lack of universal consensus on PRP for OA underscores the complex interplay between clinical evidence, practice patterns, and evolving perspectives. Recent shifts toward endorsing PRP may reflect advancements in preparation techniques and personalized medicine approaches. However, challenges persist, including patient selection and product standardization. Efforts to develop consensus and refine PRP classification systems are essential for guiding clinical practice and advancing OA management.

就富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎达成普遍共识的 "锲机":近期共识声明和专家意见综述。
导言:骨关节炎(OA)是全世界普遍存在的致残原因,影响着数百万人,造成了巨大的社会经济负担。各种保守措施,如透明质酸(HA)和富血小板血浆(PRP)注射,旨在控制 OA 症状并延迟手术干预。尽管 PRP 的使用率越来越高,但人们对其疗效仍未达成共识,这反映了 OA 管理的不断变化:本研究回顾了全球范围内有关关节内注射 PRP 治疗 OA 的指南和建议,强调了不同医学协会之间的观点分歧。通过全面的文献检索,我们发现了 19 份相关指南,这表明人们对使用 PRP 的态度在时间和地域上发生了演变。一些指南认可 PRP 用于轻度至中度 OA,而另一些指南则对产品标准化和临床证据异质性表示谨慎:专家观点:对于PRP治疗OA缺乏普遍共识凸显了临床证据、实践模式和观点演变之间复杂的相互作用。最近对 PRP 的认可可能反映了制备技术和个性化医疗方法的进步。然而,挑战依然存在,包括患者选择和产品标准化。努力达成共识并完善 PRP 分类系统对于指导临床实践和推进 OA 管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信