Can temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis be diagnosed on MRI proton density weighted images with diagnostic support from the latest deep learning classification models?
{"title":"Can temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis be diagnosed on MRI proton density weighted images with diagnostic support from the latest deep learning classification models?","authors":"Michihito Nozawa, Motoki Fukuda, Shinya Kotaki, Marino Araragi, Hironori Akiyama, Yoshiko Ariji","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to clarify the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based deep learning classification models in diagnosing temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) and to compare the developed diagnostic assistance with human observers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The subjects were 118 patients who underwent MRI for examination of TMJ disorders. One hundred condyles with TMJ-OA and 100 condyles without TMJ-OA were enrolled. Deep learning was performed with four networks (ResNet18, EfficientNet b4, Inception v3, and GoogLeNet) using five-fold cross validation. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were drawn for each model and diagnostic metrics were determined. The performances of the four network models were compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests and post-hoc Scheffe tests, and ROCs between the best model and human were compared using chi-square tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ResNet18 had areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.91-0.93 and accuracy of 0.85-0.88, which were the highest among the four networks. There were significant differences in AUC and accuracy between ResNet and GoogLeNet (p = 0.0264 and p = 0.0418, respectively). The kappa values of the models were large, 0.95 for ResNet and 0.93 for EfficientNet. The experts achieved similar AUC and accuracy values to the ResNet metrics, 0.94 and 0.85, and 0.84 and 0.84, respectively, but with a lower kappa of 0.67. Those of the dental residents showed lower values. There were significant differences in AUCs between ResNet and residents (p < 0.0001) and between experts and residents (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a deep learning model, high performance was confirmed for MRI diagnosis of TMJ-OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to clarify the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based deep learning classification models in diagnosing temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) and to compare the developed diagnostic assistance with human observers.
Methods: The subjects were 118 patients who underwent MRI for examination of TMJ disorders. One hundred condyles with TMJ-OA and 100 condyles without TMJ-OA were enrolled. Deep learning was performed with four networks (ResNet18, EfficientNet b4, Inception v3, and GoogLeNet) using five-fold cross validation. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were drawn for each model and diagnostic metrics were determined. The performances of the four network models were compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests and post-hoc Scheffe tests, and ROCs between the best model and human were compared using chi-square tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant.
Results: ResNet18 had areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.91-0.93 and accuracy of 0.85-0.88, which were the highest among the four networks. There were significant differences in AUC and accuracy between ResNet and GoogLeNet (p = 0.0264 and p = 0.0418, respectively). The kappa values of the models were large, 0.95 for ResNet and 0.93 for EfficientNet. The experts achieved similar AUC and accuracy values to the ResNet metrics, 0.94 and 0.85, and 0.84 and 0.84, respectively, but with a lower kappa of 0.67. Those of the dental residents showed lower values. There were significant differences in AUCs between ResNet and residents (p < 0.0001) and between experts and residents (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Using a deep learning model, high performance was confirmed for MRI diagnosis of TMJ-OA.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X