Can temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis be diagnosed on MRI proton density weighted images with diagnostic support from the latest deep learning classification models?

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Michihito Nozawa, Motoki Fukuda, Shinya Kotaki, Marino Araragi, Hironori Akiyama, Yoshiko Ariji
{"title":"Can temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis be diagnosed on MRI proton density weighted images with diagnostic support from the latest deep learning classification models?","authors":"Michihito Nozawa, Motoki Fukuda, Shinya Kotaki, Marino Araragi, Hironori Akiyama, Yoshiko Ariji","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to clarify the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based deep learning classification models in diagnosing temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) and to compare the developed diagnostic assistance with human observers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The subjects were 118 patients who underwent MRI for examination of TMJ disorders. One hundred condyles with TMJ-OA and 100 condyles without TMJ-OA were enrolled. Deep learning was performed with four networks (ResNet18, EfficientNet b4, Inception v3, and GoogLeNet) using five-fold cross validation. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were drawn for each model and diagnostic metrics were determined. The performances of the four network models were compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests and post-hoc Scheffe tests, and ROCs between the best model and human were compared using chi-square tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ResNet18 had areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.91-0.93 and accuracy of 0.85-0.88, which were the highest among the four networks. There were significant differences in AUC and accuracy between ResNet and GoogLeNet (p = 0.0264 and p = 0.0418, respectively). The kappa values of the models were large, 0.95 for ResNet and 0.93 for EfficientNet. The experts achieved similar AUC and accuracy values ​​to the ResNet metrics, 0.94 and 0.85, and 0.84 and 0.84, respectively, but with a lower kappa of 0.67. Those of the dental residents showed lower values. There were significant differences in AUCs between ResNet and residents (p < 0.0001) and between experts and residents (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a deep learning model, high performance was confirmed for MRI diagnosis of TMJ-OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to clarify the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based deep learning classification models in diagnosing temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) and to compare the developed diagnostic assistance with human observers.

Methods: The subjects were 118 patients who underwent MRI for examination of TMJ disorders. One hundred condyles with TMJ-OA and 100 condyles without TMJ-OA were enrolled. Deep learning was performed with four networks (ResNet18, EfficientNet b4, Inception v3, and GoogLeNet) using five-fold cross validation. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were drawn for each model and diagnostic metrics were determined. The performances of the four network models were compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests and post-hoc Scheffe tests, and ROCs between the best model and human were compared using chi-square tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: ResNet18 had areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.91-0.93 and accuracy of 0.85-0.88, which were the highest among the four networks. There were significant differences in AUC and accuracy between ResNet and GoogLeNet (p = 0.0264 and p = 0.0418, respectively). The kappa values of the models were large, 0.95 for ResNet and 0.93 for EfficientNet. The experts achieved similar AUC and accuracy values ​​to the ResNet metrics, 0.94 and 0.85, and 0.84 and 0.84, respectively, but with a lower kappa of 0.67. Those of the dental residents showed lower values. There were significant differences in AUCs between ResNet and residents (p < 0.0001) and between experts and residents (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Using a deep learning model, high performance was confirmed for MRI diagnosis of TMJ-OA.

在最新深度学习分类模型的诊断支持下,能否通过核磁共振质子密度加权图像诊断出颞下颌关节骨关节炎?
研究目的本研究旨在阐明基于磁共振成像(MRI)的深度学习分类模型在诊断颞下颌关节骨关节炎(TMJ-OA)方面的性能,并将所开发的诊断辅助工具与人类观察者进行比较:研究对象为118名接受磁共振成像检查的颞下颌关节疾病患者。方法:研究对象为接受 MRI 检查的 118 名颞下颌关节紊乱患者,其中 100 名患者的髁突患有颞下颌关节紊乱症,100 名患者的髁突未患有颞下颌关节紊乱症。使用四种网络(ResNet18、EfficientNet b4、Inception v3 和 GoogLeNet)进行深度学习,并使用五倍交叉验证。为每个模型绘制了接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线,并确定了诊断指标。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和事后 Scheffe 检验比较了四种网络模型的性能,并使用秩方检验比较了最佳模型与人类之间的 ROC(P 结果):ResNet18 的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.91-0.93,准确率为 0.85-0.88,是四个网络中最高的。ResNet 和 GoogLeNet 的 AUC 和准确率存在明显差异(分别为 p = 0.0264 和 p = 0.0418)。模型的 kappa 值很大,ResNet 为 0.95,EfficientNet 为 0.93。专家的 AUC 值和准确度值与 ResNet 指标相似,分别为 0.94 和 0.85,以及 0.84 和 0.84,但 kappa 值较低,为 0.67。牙科住院医师的指标值较低。ResNet 和住院医师之间的 AUCs 有明显差异(p 结论:ResNet 和住院医师之间的 AUCs 有明显差异:使用深度学习模型对颞下颌关节-OA 的 MRI 诊断具有很高的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信