Diagnostic accuracy of the anion gap to identify toxic lithium concentrations: a single-center retrospective observational study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Clinical Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1080/15563650.2024.2380771
Hiroyuki Honda, Kazuki Deuchi, Makusu Fukasawa, Katsuichiro Yamaguchi, Kei Nishiyama
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of the anion gap to identify toxic lithium concentrations: a single-center retrospective observational study.","authors":"Hiroyuki Honda, Kazuki Deuchi, Makusu Fukasawa, Katsuichiro Yamaguchi, Kei Nishiyama","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2380771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lithium exhibits a narrow margin between therapeutic doses and toxic blood concentrations, which can pose a substantial risk of toxic effects. Reportedly, lithium toxicity may be associated with a reduced anion gap; however, the precise relationship remains unclear. This study examined several different anion gap calculation methods to detect toxic lithium concentrations without directly measuring blood lithium concentrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our retrospective study analyzed blood samples collected for lithium concentration measurements. The anion gap was determined using three different methods, both with and without albumin and lactate concentration corrections. Samples were categorized into two groups based on lithium concentration (<1.5 or ≥1.5 mmol/L), and anion gap values were compared. Correlation and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between each anion gap indicator and lithium concentration. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used for diagnostic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 24 measurements were collected, with 41.7% of samples falling within the toxic range. The high-lithium concentration group exhibited significantly smaller anion gaps. Correlation and logistic regression analyses revealed a significant association between anion gap values and lithium concentrations. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were: conventional anion gap 0.77 (95% CI: 0.55-0.94); albumin-corrected anion gap 0.85 (95% CI: 0.66-1.00); and both albumin- and lactate-corrected anion gap 0.86 (95% CI: 0.66-1.00).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The anion gap is calculated as the difference between measured cations and anions. Accumulation of lithium (a cation) may decrease measured cations and decrease the calculated anion gap. Abnormal albumin and lactate concentrations may also alter the anion gap and affect its usefulness as a diagnostic marker for elevated serum lithium concentrations. A negative likelihood ratio of 0.1 suggests that the anion gap might be valuable in excluding toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The corrected anion gap, accounting for albumin and lactate concentrations, may be beneficial in suggesting the possibility of toxic lithium concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"506-511"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2380771","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lithium exhibits a narrow margin between therapeutic doses and toxic blood concentrations, which can pose a substantial risk of toxic effects. Reportedly, lithium toxicity may be associated with a reduced anion gap; however, the precise relationship remains unclear. This study examined several different anion gap calculation methods to detect toxic lithium concentrations without directly measuring blood lithium concentrations.

Methods: Our retrospective study analyzed blood samples collected for lithium concentration measurements. The anion gap was determined using three different methods, both with and without albumin and lactate concentration corrections. Samples were categorized into two groups based on lithium concentration (<1.5 or ≥1.5 mmol/L), and anion gap values were compared. Correlation and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between each anion gap indicator and lithium concentration. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used for diagnostic analysis.

Results: Overall, 24 measurements were collected, with 41.7% of samples falling within the toxic range. The high-lithium concentration group exhibited significantly smaller anion gaps. Correlation and logistic regression analyses revealed a significant association between anion gap values and lithium concentrations. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were: conventional anion gap 0.77 (95% CI: 0.55-0.94); albumin-corrected anion gap 0.85 (95% CI: 0.66-1.00); and both albumin- and lactate-corrected anion gap 0.86 (95% CI: 0.66-1.00).

Discussion: The anion gap is calculated as the difference between measured cations and anions. Accumulation of lithium (a cation) may decrease measured cations and decrease the calculated anion gap. Abnormal albumin and lactate concentrations may also alter the anion gap and affect its usefulness as a diagnostic marker for elevated serum lithium concentrations. A negative likelihood ratio of 0.1 suggests that the anion gap might be valuable in excluding toxicity.

Conclusions: The corrected anion gap, accounting for albumin and lactate concentrations, may be beneficial in suggesting the possibility of toxic lithium concentrations.

阴离子间隙识别锂中毒浓度的诊断准确性:一项单中心回顾性观察研究。
简介锂的治疗剂量与中毒血液浓度之间的差距很小,这可能会带来很大的中毒风险。据报道,锂中毒可能与阴离子间隙减小有关;但两者之间的确切关系仍不清楚。本研究探讨了几种不同的阴离子间隙计算方法,以检测毒性锂浓度,而无需直接测量血锂浓度:我们的回顾性研究分析了为测量锂浓度而采集的血液样本。阴离子间隙是用三种不同的方法测定的,既有白蛋白和乳酸浓度校正法,也有未进行白蛋白和乳酸浓度校正法。根据锂浓度将样本分为两组(结果:总共收集了 24 个测量值,其中 41.7% 的样本属于有毒范围。高锂浓度组的阴离子间隙明显较小。相关分析和逻辑回归分析表明,阴离子间隙值与锂浓度之间存在显著关联。接受者操作特征曲线下的面积为:传统阴离子间隙 0.77(95% CI:0.55-0.94);白蛋白校正阴离子间隙 0.85(95% CI:0.66-1.00);白蛋白和乳酸盐校正阴离子间隙均为 0.86(95% CI:0.66-1.00):讨论:阴离子间隙是根据测量的阳离子和阴离子之间的差值计算得出的。锂(一种阳离子)的积累可能会减少测量到的阳离子并降低计算出的阴离子间隙。白蛋白和乳酸盐浓度异常也会改变阴离子间隙,影响其作为血清锂浓度升高诊断指标的作用。负似然比为 0.1,表明阴离子间隙在排除毒性方面可能有价值:结论:考虑到白蛋白和乳酸盐浓度的校正阴离子间隙可能有助于提示锂浓度中毒的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信