Identifying Risk Factors for Poor Outcomes Following Popliteal Vascular Injuries

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
{"title":"Identifying Risk Factors for Poor Outcomes Following Popliteal Vascular Injuries","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Popliteal artery injuries (PAIs) may have amputation rates as high as 20%. This study focuses on identifying risk factors associated with major amputations following PAIs in a large single-center cohort. Additionally, we assess the impact of repairing or ligating concomitant popliteal vein injuries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective chart review encompassing 2011 to 2023 was conducted at a large urban level 1 trauma center. Patients with PAIs were included. Demographics and clinical data were analyzed, and univariate and multivariate evaluations identified significant risk factors for amputation. In patients with concomitant popliteal vein injuries, we compared outcomes between those who underwent popliteal vein repair and ligation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred eighty eight patients with PAIs were identified; 10 underwent index amputation and were excluded. Univariate analysis followed by multivariate analysis revealed that obesity (<em>P</em> = 0.0132) and neurologic deficits on arrival (<em>P</em> = 0.0096) were associated with amputation. In the subgroup with popliteal vein injuries (<em>N</em> = 93), there was no significant difference in amputation rates between those who had vein repair (<em>P</em> = 0.21) and those who underwent ligation (<em>P</em> = 0.84) on logistic regression analysis. Likewise, popliteal vein ligation did not impact duration of fasciotomy closure (<em>P</em> = 0.20) or skin graft area (<em>P</em> = 0.48) based on linear regression analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study suggests that major amputations following PAIs are more likely in obese patients with neurologic deficits. It also suggests that venous ligation in cases of concomitant popliteal vein injuries does not significantly impact early limb salvage rate. Further research is needed to determine the optimal approach for managing concomitant popliteal vein injuries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624004746","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Popliteal artery injuries (PAIs) may have amputation rates as high as 20%. This study focuses on identifying risk factors associated with major amputations following PAIs in a large single-center cohort. Additionally, we assess the impact of repairing or ligating concomitant popliteal vein injuries.

Methods

A retrospective chart review encompassing 2011 to 2023 was conducted at a large urban level 1 trauma center. Patients with PAIs were included. Demographics and clinical data were analyzed, and univariate and multivariate evaluations identified significant risk factors for amputation. In patients with concomitant popliteal vein injuries, we compared outcomes between those who underwent popliteal vein repair and ligation.

Results

One hundred eighty eight patients with PAIs were identified; 10 underwent index amputation and were excluded. Univariate analysis followed by multivariate analysis revealed that obesity (P = 0.0132) and neurologic deficits on arrival (P = 0.0096) were associated with amputation. In the subgroup with popliteal vein injuries (N = 93), there was no significant difference in amputation rates between those who had vein repair (P = 0.21) and those who underwent ligation (P = 0.84) on logistic regression analysis. Likewise, popliteal vein ligation did not impact duration of fasciotomy closure (P = 0.20) or skin graft area (P = 0.48) based on linear regression analysis.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that major amputations following PAIs are more likely in obese patients with neurologic deficits. It also suggests that venous ligation in cases of concomitant popliteal vein injuries does not significantly impact early limb salvage rate. Further research is needed to determine the optimal approach for managing concomitant popliteal vein injuries.

识别腘窝血管损伤后不良后果的风险因素。
简介腘动脉损伤的截肢率可能高达 20%。本研究的重点是在一个大型单中心队列中确定与腘动脉损伤后主要截肢相关的风险因素。此外,我们还评估了修复或结扎并发腘静脉损伤的影响:一家大型城市一级创伤中心对 2011 年至 2023 年的病历进行了回顾性分析。纳入了腘动脉损伤患者。对人口统计学和临床数据进行了分析,并通过单变量和多变量评估确定了截肢的重要风险因素。在合并腘静脉损伤的患者中,我们比较了腘静脉修复术和结扎术的治疗效果:结果:共发现 188 名腘动脉损伤患者,其中 10 人接受了指数截肢手术,被排除在外。单变量分析和多变量分析显示,肥胖(p= 0.0132)和抵达时的神经功能缺损(p=0.0096)与截肢有关。在腘静脉损伤亚组(N=93)中,进行静脉修复(P=0.21)和结扎(P=0.84)的截肢率在逻辑回归分析中没有显著差异。同样,根据线性回归分析,腘静脉结扎也不会影响筋膜切开术的闭合时间(p=0.20)或植皮面积(p=0.48):我们的研究表明,神经功能缺损的肥胖患者更有可能在腘动脉损伤后截肢。研究还表明,腘静脉损伤的静脉结扎对早期肢体挽救率并无明显影响。要确定处理并发腘静脉损伤的最佳方法,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信