The CentiMarker Project: Standardizing Quantitative Alzheimer's disease Fluid Biomarkers for Biologic Interpretation

Guoqiao Wang, Yan Li, Chengjie Xiong, Yuchen Cao, Suzanne Schindler, Eric McDade, Kaj Blennow, Oskar Hansson, Jeffrey L. Dage, Clifford R. Jack, Charlotte E. Teunissen, Leslie M Shaw, Henrik Zetterberg, Laura Ibanez, Jigyasha Timsina, Carlos Cruchaga, Randall J Bateman
{"title":"The CentiMarker Project: Standardizing Quantitative Alzheimer's disease Fluid Biomarkers for Biologic Interpretation","authors":"Guoqiao Wang, Yan Li, Chengjie Xiong, Yuchen Cao, Suzanne Schindler, Eric McDade, Kaj Blennow, Oskar Hansson, Jeffrey L. Dage, Clifford R. Jack, Charlotte E. Teunissen, Leslie M Shaw, Henrik Zetterberg, Laura Ibanez, Jigyasha Timsina, Carlos Cruchaga, Randall J Bateman","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.25.24311002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Biomarkers have been essential to understanding Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis, pathophysiology, progression, and treatment effects. However, each biomarker measure is a representation of the biological target, the assay used to measure it, and the variance of the assay. Thus, biomarker measures are difficult to compare without standardization, and the units and magnitude of effect relative to the disease are difficult to appreciate, even for experts. To facilitate quantitative comparisons of AD biomarkers in the context of biologic and treatment effects, we propose a biomarker standardization approach between normal ranges and maximum abnormal AD ranges, which we refer to as CentiMarker, similar to the Centiloid approach used in PET.\nMethods: We developed a standardization scale that creates percentile values ranging from 0 for a normal population to 100 for the most abnormal measures across disease stages. We applied this scale to CSF and plasma biomarkers in autosomal dominant AD, assessing the distribution by estimated years from symptom onset, between biomarkers, and across cohorts. We then validated this approach in a large national sporadic AD cohort.\nResults: We found the CentiMarker scale provided an easily interpretable metric of disease abnormality. The biologic changes, range, and distribution of several AD fluid biomarkers including amyloid-β, phospho-tau and other biomarkers, were comparable across disease stages in both early onset autosomal dominant and sporadic late onset AD.\nDiscussion: The CentiMarker scale offers a robust and versatile framework for the standardized biological comparison of AD biomarkers. Its broader adoption could facilitate biomarker reporting, allowing for more informed cross-study comparisons and contributing to accelerated therapeutic development.","PeriodicalId":501367,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Neurology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.25.24311002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Biomarkers have been essential to understanding Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis, pathophysiology, progression, and treatment effects. However, each biomarker measure is a representation of the biological target, the assay used to measure it, and the variance of the assay. Thus, biomarker measures are difficult to compare without standardization, and the units and magnitude of effect relative to the disease are difficult to appreciate, even for experts. To facilitate quantitative comparisons of AD biomarkers in the context of biologic and treatment effects, we propose a biomarker standardization approach between normal ranges and maximum abnormal AD ranges, which we refer to as CentiMarker, similar to the Centiloid approach used in PET. Methods: We developed a standardization scale that creates percentile values ranging from 0 for a normal population to 100 for the most abnormal measures across disease stages. We applied this scale to CSF and plasma biomarkers in autosomal dominant AD, assessing the distribution by estimated years from symptom onset, between biomarkers, and across cohorts. We then validated this approach in a large national sporadic AD cohort. Results: We found the CentiMarker scale provided an easily interpretable metric of disease abnormality. The biologic changes, range, and distribution of several AD fluid biomarkers including amyloid-β, phospho-tau and other biomarkers, were comparable across disease stages in both early onset autosomal dominant and sporadic late onset AD. Discussion: The CentiMarker scale offers a robust and versatile framework for the standardized biological comparison of AD biomarkers. Its broader adoption could facilitate biomarker reporting, allowing for more informed cross-study comparisons and contributing to accelerated therapeutic development.
CentiMarker 项目:标准化定量阿尔茨海默病体液生物标志物的生物学解释
导言:生物标志物对于了解阿尔茨海默病(AD)的发病机制、病理生理学、进展和治疗效果至关重要。然而,每种生物标志物的测量结果都代表了生物靶标、用于测量靶标的检测方法以及检测方法的差异。因此,如果没有标准化,生物标志物的测量很难进行比较,而且即使是专家也很难理解相对于疾病的影响单位和影响程度。为了便于在生物效应和治疗效应的背景下对 AD 生物标志物进行定量比较,我们提出了一种在正常范围和 AD 最大异常范围之间进行生物标志物标准化的方法,我们称之为 CentiMarker,类似于 PET 中使用的 Centiloid 方法:我们开发了一种标准化量表,该量表可创建百分位值,范围从正常人群的 0 到各疾病阶段最异常指标的 100。我们将这一量表应用于常染色体显性 AD 的脑脊液和血浆生物标记物,评估了不同生物标记物之间以及不同队列之间从症状出现起估计年限的分布情况。然后,我们在一个大型全国散发性注意力缺失症队列中验证了这种方法:结果:我们发现 CentiMarker 量表提供了一种易于解释的疾病异常度量标准。包括淀粉样蛋白-β、磷酸化-tau和其他生物标记物在内的几种AD体液生物标记物的生物变化、范围和分布在早发常染色体显性遗传和散发性晚发AD的不同疾病阶段具有可比性:CentiMarker量表为对AD生物标志物进行标准化生物学比较提供了一个稳健且通用的框架。CentiMarker量表为AD生物标记物的标准化生物学比较提供了一个稳健、通用的框架,它的广泛采用将促进生物标记物的报告,使跨研究比较更加有据可依,并有助于加速治疗方法的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信