A new device to reduce mammal predation on reptiles in pitfall traps

IF 1.6 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Wildlife Research Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1071/wr24061
Andrea D. Stiglingh, Katherine E. Moseby, Georgina Neave, Nathan Beerkens, Katherine Tuft
{"title":"A new device to reduce mammal predation on reptiles in pitfall traps","authors":"Andrea D. Stiglingh, Katherine E. Moseby, Georgina Neave, Nathan Beerkens, Katherine Tuft","doi":"10.1071/wr24061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>Many vertebrate studies report predation from pit co-occupants as a source of mortality during pitfall surveys.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>This study aims to assess the use of false-floors in pitfall traps to reduce the opportunistic predation of small reptiles by small mammals caught within the same pit.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Small-vertebrate surveys were conducted using pitfall traps in an arid landscape from 1998 to 2021. Between 2018 and 2021, wooden false-floors with 2 cm notches in their sides were placed inside pitfall traps to reduce the amount of reptile predation caused by small mammals co-occupying the same pit. The position of captured individuals, relative to the false-floor, were used to assess the capacity of false-floors to create an effective barrier between captured reptiles and mammals.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>During the false-floor trial period (2018–2021), <i>Pseudomys australis</i> and <i>Notomys alexis</i> were identified as the key mammal species opportunistically predating on captured reptiles, collectively accounting for 54% of reptile predation incidents. Most of the <i>N. alexis</i> and <i>P. australis</i> captures were found above false-floors (92 and 70% of captures respectively), indicating that they were generally not able to access the prey refuge beneath. Reptile mortality from small mammal predation was significantly lower in pitfalls with false-floors (15% of reptile-mammal co-occupancy incidents) than in those without (60% of co-occupancy incidents). However, false-floors did not prevent all predation events because some mammals were able to access the compartment underneath the false-floors.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>The false-floors provided an effective barrier between small reptiles and key mammal species caught in the same pit and reduced occurrences of small reptile predation.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>False-floors can effectively be used as a tool to reduce reptile mortality during pitfall surveys. However, they also increased the time taken to set and check traps and we therefore suggest their use only during times of high mammal abundances, when the abundance of large rodents is high. The efficacy of false-floors at any particular site may be improved by trialling different-sized notches and construction materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":23971,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/wr24061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Many vertebrate studies report predation from pit co-occupants as a source of mortality during pitfall surveys.

Aims

This study aims to assess the use of false-floors in pitfall traps to reduce the opportunistic predation of small reptiles by small mammals caught within the same pit.

Methods

Small-vertebrate surveys were conducted using pitfall traps in an arid landscape from 1998 to 2021. Between 2018 and 2021, wooden false-floors with 2 cm notches in their sides were placed inside pitfall traps to reduce the amount of reptile predation caused by small mammals co-occupying the same pit. The position of captured individuals, relative to the false-floor, were used to assess the capacity of false-floors to create an effective barrier between captured reptiles and mammals.

Key results

During the false-floor trial period (2018–2021), Pseudomys australis and Notomys alexis were identified as the key mammal species opportunistically predating on captured reptiles, collectively accounting for 54% of reptile predation incidents. Most of the N. alexis and P. australis captures were found above false-floors (92 and 70% of captures respectively), indicating that they were generally not able to access the prey refuge beneath. Reptile mortality from small mammal predation was significantly lower in pitfalls with false-floors (15% of reptile-mammal co-occupancy incidents) than in those without (60% of co-occupancy incidents). However, false-floors did not prevent all predation events because some mammals were able to access the compartment underneath the false-floors.

Conclusions

The false-floors provided an effective barrier between small reptiles and key mammal species caught in the same pit and reduced occurrences of small reptile predation.

Implications

False-floors can effectively be used as a tool to reduce reptile mortality during pitfall surveys. However, they also increased the time taken to set and check traps and we therefore suggest their use only during times of high mammal abundances, when the abundance of large rodents is high. The efficacy of false-floors at any particular site may be improved by trialling different-sized notches and construction materials.

减少坑式陷阱中哺乳动物捕食爬行动物的新装置
背景许多脊椎动物研究报告称,在坑阱调查过程中,坑阱同居者的捕食是造成死亡的一个原因。目的本研究旨在评估坑式陷阱中假地板的使用情况,以减少小型哺乳动物在同一坑内捕食小型爬行动物的机会性捕食。方法1998年至2021年期间,在干旱地区使用坑式陷阱进行了小型无脊椎动物调查。2018年至2021年期间,在坑阱内放置了侧面有2厘米凹槽的木制假地板,以减少小型哺乳动物共同占据同一坑阱造成的爬行动物捕食量。捕获个体相对于假地板的位置被用来评估假地板在捕获的爬行动物和哺乳动物之间建立有效屏障的能力。主要结果在假地板试验期间(2018-2021 年),发现澳大利亚伪尾鸲和虹尾鸲是伺机捕食捕获的爬行动物的主要哺乳动物物种,共占爬行动物捕食事件的 54%。大部分被捕获的蛙类和蛙类都是在假浮板上面被发现的(分别占捕获量的92%和70%),这表明它们一般无法进入下面的猎物避难所。在有假地板的坑道中,爬行动物被小型哺乳动物捕食的死亡率(15%的爬行动物与哺乳动物共栖事件)明显低于没有假地板的坑道(60%的爬行动物与哺乳动物共栖事件)。然而,假地板并不能防止所有的捕食事件,因为一些哺乳动物能够进入假地板下面的隔间。结论假地板在小型爬行动物和主要哺乳动物之间提供了一个有效的屏障,减少了小型爬行动物被捕食的情况。意义在坑式调查中,假地板可以有效地降低爬行动物的死亡率。然而,它们也增加了设置和检查陷阱所需的时间,因此我们建议仅在哺乳动物数量较多、大型啮齿类动物数量较多的时候使用。通过试用不同大小的凹槽和建筑材料,可以提高假地板在任何特定地点的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wildlife Research
Wildlife Research 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Wildlife Research represents an international forum for the publication of research and debate on the ecology, management and conservation of wild animals in natural and modified habitats. The journal combines basic research in wildlife ecology with advances in science-based management practice. Subject areas include: applied ecology; conservation biology; ecosystem management; management of over-abundant, pest and invasive species; global change and wildlife management; diseases and their impacts on wildlife populations; human dimensions of management and conservation; assessing management outcomes; and the implications of wildlife research for policy development. Readers can expect a range of papers covering well-structured field studies, manipulative experiments, and analytical and modelling studies. All articles aim to improve the practice of wildlife management and contribute conceptual advances to our knowledge and understanding of wildlife ecology. Wildlife Research is a vital resource for wildlife scientists, students and managers, applied ecologists, conservation biologists, environmental consultants and NGOs and government policy advisors. Wildlife Research is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信