Does Early Elementary Dual Language Instruction Deliver as Promised?

IF 3.5 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Natalia Palacios, Natalie L. Bohlmann, Bethany A. Bell, Min Hyun Oh, Yitong Yue
{"title":"Does Early Elementary Dual Language Instruction Deliver as Promised?","authors":"Natalia Palacios, Natalie L. Bohlmann, Bethany A. Bell, Min Hyun Oh, Yitong Yue","doi":"10.1177/23328584241264513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Utilizing Utah state data, the aim of this study is to examine the association between language program types programs (dual language programs [DLI], sheltered instruction [SEI], and English as a second language [ESL]) since first grade and third-grade basic literacy skills of Spanish-speaking English learners (ELs) in the United States. We employ propensity score matching (PSM) to generate matched samples using child and family factors known to be associated with children’s early literacy: child sex, immigrant status, unhoused status, special education status, child met Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) benchmark at start of first grade, as well as family income and parental language (DLI & ESL, n = 380; DLI & SEI, n = 380; SEI & ESL, n = 550). Regression models comparing early literacy outcomes for each matched group indicate small trends, based on effect sizes, in favor of DLI programs when compared to other program types, although differences were not statistically significant. Implications for policy and practice related bilingual education are addressed.","PeriodicalId":31132,"journal":{"name":"Aera Open","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aera Open","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241264513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Utilizing Utah state data, the aim of this study is to examine the association between language program types programs (dual language programs [DLI], sheltered instruction [SEI], and English as a second language [ESL]) since first grade and third-grade basic literacy skills of Spanish-speaking English learners (ELs) in the United States. We employ propensity score matching (PSM) to generate matched samples using child and family factors known to be associated with children’s early literacy: child sex, immigrant status, unhoused status, special education status, child met Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) benchmark at start of first grade, as well as family income and parental language (DLI & ESL, n = 380; DLI & SEI, n = 380; SEI & ESL, n = 550). Regression models comparing early literacy outcomes for each matched group indicate small trends, based on effect sizes, in favor of DLI programs when compared to other program types, although differences were not statistically significant. Implications for policy and practice related bilingual education are addressed.
小学低年级双语教学是否如约而至?
本研究利用犹他州的数据,旨在考察美国讲西班牙语的英语学习者(ELs)自一年级和三年级基础识字能力以来,语言课程类型(双语课程[DLI]、庇护性教学[SEI]和英语作为第二语言[ESL])之间的关联。我们采用倾向得分匹配法(PSM),利用已知与儿童早期识字能力相关的儿童和家庭因素生成匹配样本:儿童性别、移民身份、无住房状况、特殊教育状况、儿童在一年级开始时达到早期基本识字能力动态指标(DIBELS)基准,以及家庭收入和父母语言(DLI & ESL,n = 380;DLI & SEI,n = 380;SEI & ESL,n = 550)。比较每个匹配组早期识字成果的回归模型显示,根据效应大小,与其他项目类型相比,DLI 项目有微小的优势趋势,尽管差异在统计上并不显著。本文探讨了双语教育相关政策和实践的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aera Open
Aera Open EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
60
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信