ASSESSING THE ACCESSIBILITY, AFFORDABILITY, AND ACCEPTABILITY OF REFRACTIVE SERVICES AS BARRIERS TO UPTAKE OF THESE SERVICES IN KAKAMEGA MUNICIPALITY, KENYA

Naimah E Khan, Martin Masinde Kisenge
{"title":"ASSESSING THE ACCESSIBILITY, AFFORDABILITY, AND ACCEPTABILITY OF REFRACTIVE SERVICES AS BARRIERS TO UPTAKE OF THESE SERVICES IN KAKAMEGA MUNICIPALITY, KENYA","authors":"Naimah E Khan, Martin Masinde Kisenge","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.24.24310925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background information: Refractive errors and presbyopia remain a burden to the entire population. An estimated 76% of the 191 million blind people have preventable or treatable causes. Uncorrected Refractive Error (URE), the number one cause (51%) of moderate and severe vision impairment is easily preventable. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the accessibility, affordability, and acceptability of refractive services in Kakamega Municipality. Methodology: A population-based descriptive cross-sectional study was undertaken in Kakamega municipality using a cluster sampling method and descriptive data analysis. Results: Out of 358 participants, 199 (55.6%) were male and 159 (44.4%) were female. The analysis shows affordability (18.3%) as the main reason for not using spectacles, followed by lack of quality care (3.4%), access to eye care (3.4%), awareness (2.5%), unpleasant past experiences (2.2%), importance not given to eye care issues (1.6%), lack of communication (0.9%), and disapproval from family members (0.9%). The study found that the affordable price range for spectacles varies between Kshs.5000 and less than Kshs.2000. More participants (38.0%) reported above Kshs.5000, while 29% indicated less Kshs.2000. The study found that affordability (p = 0.000), availability (p=0.004), and accessibility (p=0.005) of refractive services significantly influenced the uptake of these services.\nConclusion: The study reveals that refractive services in Kakamega municipality are not easily accessible due to the lack of adequate services in government hospitals. Additionally, patients in the municipality struggle to afford spectacles due to the direct cost of spectacles and the lack of services in easily accessible public facilities.\nKeywords: Barriers Accessibility Affordability Availability Uptake Refractive services","PeriodicalId":501390,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.24.24310925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background information: Refractive errors and presbyopia remain a burden to the entire population. An estimated 76% of the 191 million blind people have preventable or treatable causes. Uncorrected Refractive Error (URE), the number one cause (51%) of moderate and severe vision impairment is easily preventable. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the accessibility, affordability, and acceptability of refractive services in Kakamega Municipality. Methodology: A population-based descriptive cross-sectional study was undertaken in Kakamega municipality using a cluster sampling method and descriptive data analysis. Results: Out of 358 participants, 199 (55.6%) were male and 159 (44.4%) were female. The analysis shows affordability (18.3%) as the main reason for not using spectacles, followed by lack of quality care (3.4%), access to eye care (3.4%), awareness (2.5%), unpleasant past experiences (2.2%), importance not given to eye care issues (1.6%), lack of communication (0.9%), and disapproval from family members (0.9%). The study found that the affordable price range for spectacles varies between Kshs.5000 and less than Kshs.2000. More participants (38.0%) reported above Kshs.5000, while 29% indicated less Kshs.2000. The study found that affordability (p = 0.000), availability (p=0.004), and accessibility (p=0.005) of refractive services significantly influenced the uptake of these services. Conclusion: The study reveals that refractive services in Kakamega municipality are not easily accessible due to the lack of adequate services in government hospitals. Additionally, patients in the municipality struggle to afford spectacles due to the direct cost of spectacles and the lack of services in easily accessible public facilities. Keywords: Barriers Accessibility Affordability Availability Uptake Refractive services
评估肯尼亚卡卡梅加市屈光服务的可获得性、可负担性和可接受性对这些服务的使用所造成的障碍
摘要 背景信息:屈光不正和老花眼仍然是整个人口的负担。据估计,在 1.91 亿盲人中,有 76% 是由于可预防或可治疗的原因造成的。未矫正屈光不正(URE)是导致中度和重度视力损伤的首要原因(51%),而这是很容易预防的。目的:本研究旨在评估卡卡梅加市屈光服务的可获得性、可负担性和可接受性。研究方法:在卡卡梅加市开展了一项以人口为基础的描述性横断面研究,采用了聚类抽样方法和描述性数据分析。研究结果在 358 名参与者中,199 人(55.6%)为男性,159 人(44.4%)为女性。分析表明,负担能力(18.3%)是不使用眼镜的主要原因,其次是缺乏高质量的护理(3.4%)、获得眼科护理的机会(3.4%)、意识(2.5%)、过去不愉快的经历(2.2%)、不重视眼科护理问题(1.6%)、缺乏沟通(0.9%)和家庭成员的不赞同(0.9%)。研究发现,眼镜的可承受价格范围在 5000 到 2000 肯尼亚先令之间。更多的参与者(38.0%)表示高于 5000 肯尼亚先令,而 29% 表示低于 2000 肯尼亚先令。研究发现,屈光服务的可负担性(p=0.000)、可用性(p=0.004)和可获得性(p=0.005)对这些服务的接受度有显著影响:研究表明,由于政府医院缺乏足够的服务,卡卡梅加市的屈光服务并不容易获得。此外,由于眼镜的直接成本以及缺乏方便的公共设施服务,该市的患者很难负担得起眼镜费用:障碍 可及性 可负担性 可及性 使用率 屈光服务
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信