Tree cavity density is a limiting factor for a secondary cavity nester in second-growth Andean temperate rainforests

Tomás A Altamirano, Fernando Novoa, José Tomás Ibarra, Sergio A Navarrete, Cristián Bonacic, Kathy Martin
{"title":"Tree cavity density is a limiting factor for a secondary cavity nester in second-growth Andean temperate rainforests","authors":"Tomás A Altamirano, Fernando Novoa, José Tomás Ibarra, Sergio A Navarrete, Cristián Bonacic, Kathy Martin","doi":"10.1093/ornithapp/duae031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cavity-nesting bird populations are most frequently limited by the number of tree cavities available in second-growth forests. However, this possible limitation of a key resource is less clear in old-growth forests. We compared forest attributes (i.e., basal area, density of larger trees, density of dead trees, and tree cavity density) in second-growth and old-growth stands in Andean temperate rainforests in southern Chile. To examine the role of nest-site availability in limiting the populations of Aphrastura spinicauda (Thorn-Tailed Rayadito), a secondary cavity-nesting bird species, we conducted an experiment in which nest boxes were added and removed in old-growth and second-growth forests during a 5-yr period (2008–2013). In old-growth forests, as compared to second-growth forests, we found a more than double basal area (99.6 vs. 43.7 m2 ha–1), a three times higher density of larger trees (88.2 vs. 36.4 trees ha–1), and a 1.5 times higher number of small cavities (25.9 vs. 10.3 cavities ha–1). The density of cavities also strongly increased with tree diameter and basal area. In second-growth forests, A. spinicauda showed a strong response to the addition and removal of nest boxes, with population abundance increasing by 13% and then decreasing by 50%, respectively. In contrast, we found no impact in old-growth stands. Our experiment emphasizes the importance of maintaining large and dead trees in second-growth, disturbed, and managed forests. These trees provide suitable cavities for A. spinicauda, and likely many other secondary cavity nesters, increasing their abundances in a Globally significant Biodiversity Hotspot in southern South America.","PeriodicalId":501493,"journal":{"name":"The Condor: Ornithological Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Condor: Ornithological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duae031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cavity-nesting bird populations are most frequently limited by the number of tree cavities available in second-growth forests. However, this possible limitation of a key resource is less clear in old-growth forests. We compared forest attributes (i.e., basal area, density of larger trees, density of dead trees, and tree cavity density) in second-growth and old-growth stands in Andean temperate rainforests in southern Chile. To examine the role of nest-site availability in limiting the populations of Aphrastura spinicauda (Thorn-Tailed Rayadito), a secondary cavity-nesting bird species, we conducted an experiment in which nest boxes were added and removed in old-growth and second-growth forests during a 5-yr period (2008–2013). In old-growth forests, as compared to second-growth forests, we found a more than double basal area (99.6 vs. 43.7 m2 ha–1), a three times higher density of larger trees (88.2 vs. 36.4 trees ha–1), and a 1.5 times higher number of small cavities (25.9 vs. 10.3 cavities ha–1). The density of cavities also strongly increased with tree diameter and basal area. In second-growth forests, A. spinicauda showed a strong response to the addition and removal of nest boxes, with population abundance increasing by 13% and then decreasing by 50%, respectively. In contrast, we found no impact in old-growth stands. Our experiment emphasizes the importance of maintaining large and dead trees in second-growth, disturbed, and managed forests. These trees provide suitable cavities for A. spinicauda, and likely many other secondary cavity nesters, increasing their abundances in a Globally significant Biodiversity Hotspot in southern South America.
树洞密度是二次生长的安第斯温带雨林中次生穴居鸟的限制因素
在次生林中,树洞筑巢鸟类的数量经常受到树洞数量的限制。然而,这种关键资源可能受到的限制在原始森林中并不明显。我们比较了智利南部安第斯温带雨林中次生林和老林中的森林属性(即基部面积、大树密度、枯树密度和树洞密度)。为了研究巢址的可用性在限制次生穴巢鸟类 Aphrastura spinicauda(刺尾雷鸟)种群数量方面的作用,我们进行了一项实验,在 5 年的时间里(2008-2013 年),在古老森林和次生林中添加和移除巢箱。与次生林相比,我们发现原始森林的基底面积增加了一倍多(99.6 平方米对 43.7 平方米公顷-1),大树密度增加了三倍(88.2 棵对 36.4 棵公顷-1),小洞数量增加了 1.5 倍(25.9 个对 10.3 个公顷-1)。蛀洞密度也随着树木直径和基部面积的增加而增加。在次生林中,A. spinicauda对巢箱的增加和移除表现出强烈的反应,种群数量分别增加了13%和减少了50%。与此相反,我们在老龄林中没有发现任何影响。我们的实验强调了在次生林、受干扰林和管理林中保持大树和枯树的重要性。这些树木为桫椤提供了合适的巢穴,也可能为许多其他次生巢穴栖息者提供了合适的巢穴,增加了它们在南美洲南部具有全球意义的生物多样性热点地区的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信