On some $$\Sigma ^{B}_{0}$$ -formulae generalizing counting principles over $$V^{0}$$

IF 0.4 4区 数学 Q4 LOGIC
Eitetsu Ken
{"title":"On some $$\\Sigma ^{B}_{0}$$ -formulae generalizing counting principles over $$V^{0}$$","authors":"Eitetsu Ken","doi":"10.1007/s00153-024-00938-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We formalize various counting principles and compare their strengths over <span>\\(V^{0}\\)</span>. In particular, we conjecture the following mutual independence between:</p><ul>\n<li>\n<p>a uniform version of modular counting principles and the pigeonhole principle for injections,</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>a version of the oddtown theorem and modular counting principles of modulus <i>p</i>, where <i>p</i> is any natural number which is not a power of 2,</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>and a version of Fisher’s inequality and modular counting principles.</p>\n</li>\n</ul><p> Then, we give sufficient conditions to prove them. We give a variation of the notion of <i>PHP</i>-tree and <i>k</i>-evaluation to show that any Frege proof of the pigeonhole principle for injections admitting the uniform counting principle as an axiom scheme cannot have <i>o</i>(<i>n</i>)-evaluations. As for the remaining two, we utilize well-known notions of <i>p</i>-tree and <i>k</i>-evaluation and reduce the problems to the existence of certain families of polynomials witnessing violations of the corresponding combinatorial principles with low-degree Nullstellensatz proofs from the violation of the modular counting principle in concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":8350,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-024-00938-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We formalize various counting principles and compare their strengths over \(V^{0}\). In particular, we conjecture the following mutual independence between:

  • a uniform version of modular counting principles and the pigeonhole principle for injections,

  • a version of the oddtown theorem and modular counting principles of modulus p, where p is any natural number which is not a power of 2,

  • and a version of Fisher’s inequality and modular counting principles.

Then, we give sufficient conditions to prove them. We give a variation of the notion of PHP-tree and k-evaluation to show that any Frege proof of the pigeonhole principle for injections admitting the uniform counting principle as an axiom scheme cannot have o(n)-evaluations. As for the remaining two, we utilize well-known notions of p-tree and k-evaluation and reduce the problems to the existence of certain families of polynomials witnessing violations of the corresponding combinatorial principles with low-degree Nullstellensatz proofs from the violation of the modular counting principle in concern.

关于在 $$V^{0}$ 上概括计数原理的一些 $$\Sigma ^{B}_{0}$ 公式
我们形式化了各种计数原理,并比较了它们在 \(V^{0}\) 上的优势。特别是,我们猜想:模块计数原理的统一版本与注入的鸽洞原理、奇镇定理的版本与模数为 p 的模块计数原理(其中 p 是任何不是 2 的幂的自然数)、费雪不等式的版本与模块计数原理之间存在以下相互独立性。然后,我们给出了证明它们的充分条件。我们给出了 PHP 树和 k 评估概念的变体,以证明任何以统一计数原理为公理方案的注入鸽洞原理的弗雷格证明都不可能有 o(n)- 评估。至于其余两个问题,我们利用众所周知的 p-tree 和 k-evaluation 概念,将问题简化为是否存在某些多项式族,这些多项式族见证了对相应组合原理的违反,并从对模块计数原理的违反中得到了低度 Nullstellensatz 证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信