Hand anthropometrics from radiograms of Italian women: A population-specific ergonomic design procedure

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Alberto Dal Maso, Francesca Cosmi
{"title":"Hand anthropometrics from radiograms of Italian women: A population-specific ergonomic design procedure","authors":"Alberto Dal Maso, Francesca Cosmi","doi":"10.1177/09544062241258073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To design a comfortable hand support, the population-specific morphological characteristics of human hands must be known. Surface and bone anthropometric data from 177 radiograms of the left hands of an unselected sample of 87 subjects (training set) belonging to the Italian, female population (age 58 ± 12) were collected. Hand Length (HL) and Hand Width (HW) were respectively 172 ± 8 mm and 81 ± 4 mm; Hand Bone Length (HBL) was 179 ± 8 mm. A separate validation set consisting of 25 radiograms from 25 patients belonging to the same population was also collected. Bone and surface measurements were compared to validate the relationships proposed by Kong et al. Their approach applied to the validation set resulted in errors between 3.1% and 8.7%, which is almost as accurate (low bias) but somewhat less precise (higher mean errors) than what found by Kong et al. on their own sample belonging to the Korean population. Two methods were developed to predict the positions of the Metacarpo-phalangeal joints of the Index, Middle, and Ring fingers with reference to the Index-Middle interdigital crotch: method PM, based on the population mean, and method PR, which also considers the Hand Width. The overall average estimation error for method PM is 1.87 mm, while for method PR it is 1.69 mm. Method PR compared to method PM improves the precision by up to 32% in the x direction and 3% in the y direction. Based on these results, a 3D CAD hand model representing the target population was developed, which can be used for the design of population-specific ergonomic medical devices.","PeriodicalId":20558,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062241258073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To design a comfortable hand support, the population-specific morphological characteristics of human hands must be known. Surface and bone anthropometric data from 177 radiograms of the left hands of an unselected sample of 87 subjects (training set) belonging to the Italian, female population (age 58 ± 12) were collected. Hand Length (HL) and Hand Width (HW) were respectively 172 ± 8 mm and 81 ± 4 mm; Hand Bone Length (HBL) was 179 ± 8 mm. A separate validation set consisting of 25 radiograms from 25 patients belonging to the same population was also collected. Bone and surface measurements were compared to validate the relationships proposed by Kong et al. Their approach applied to the validation set resulted in errors between 3.1% and 8.7%, which is almost as accurate (low bias) but somewhat less precise (higher mean errors) than what found by Kong et al. on their own sample belonging to the Korean population. Two methods were developed to predict the positions of the Metacarpo-phalangeal joints of the Index, Middle, and Ring fingers with reference to the Index-Middle interdigital crotch: method PM, based on the population mean, and method PR, which also considers the Hand Width. The overall average estimation error for method PM is 1.87 mm, while for method PR it is 1.69 mm. Method PR compared to method PM improves the precision by up to 32% in the x direction and 3% in the y direction. Based on these results, a 3D CAD hand model representing the target population was developed, which can be used for the design of population-specific ergonomic medical devices.
从意大利女性的放射线照片中得出的手部人体测量数据:针对特定人群的人体工程学设计程序
要设计出舒适的手部支撑,必须了解特定人群的手部形态特征。本研究收集了意大利女性人口(年龄 58 ± 12 岁)中未经挑选的 87 名受试者(训练集)左手的 177 张放射线照片的表面和骨骼人体测量数据。手长(HL)和手宽(HW)分别为 172 ± 8 毫米和 81 ± 4 毫米;手骨长(HBL)为 179 ± 8 毫米。另外还收集了属于同一人群的 25 名患者的 25 张放射线照片组成的验证集。他们的方法应用于验证集的结果误差在 3.1% 到 8.7% 之间,与 Kong 等人在韩国人口样本中发现的结果相比,几乎一样准确(偏差较小),但精度稍低(平均误差较大)。我们开发了两种方法来预测食指、中指和无名指的掌指关节与食指-中指胯间的位置:一种是基于人群平均值的 PM 方法,另一种是同时考虑了手掌宽度的 PR 方法。PM 方法的总体平均估计误差为 1.87 毫米,而 PR 方法为 1.69 毫米。与 PM 方法相比,PR 方法在 x 方向上提高了 32%,在 y 方向上提高了 3%。基于这些结果,我们开发了一个代表目标人群的三维 CAD 手部模型,该模型可用于设计针对特定人群的人体工学医疗设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
625
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science advances the understanding of both the fundamentals of engineering science and its application to the solution of challenges and problems in engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信