Conceptual, Mathematical, and Analytical Foundations for Mission Engineering and System of Systems Analysis

IF 4 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Ali K. Raz;Mohammed Bhuyian;Jose L. Bricio-Neto;Christopher Santos;Daniel Maxwell
{"title":"Conceptual, Mathematical, and Analytical Foundations for Mission Engineering and System of Systems Analysis","authors":"Ali K. Raz;Mohammed Bhuyian;Jose L. Bricio-Neto;Christopher Santos;Daniel Maxwell","doi":"10.1109/JSYST.2024.3409231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mission engineering (ME) is an emerging approach to designing and analyzing configurations of system-of-systems (SoS) for accomplishing one or more missions. ME seeks to flexibly leverage SoS capabilities and dynamically adapt their configuration to meet evolving mission needs. SoS configurations today, however, remain static and are carefully designed to accomplish a mission. The problem we address in this article is developing modeling and analysis techniques for flexible integration and adaptive selection of potential SoS configurations to achieve multiple missions with an overarching agility in the execution space. We propose a foundational framework for ME, complete with semantics and grammar to represent the ME design space (MEDS), along with a set of logical and mathematical modeling approaches that lends the MEDS to robust SoS analytical methods. Specifically, the framework proposes development of a mission-focused ontology and domain-specific language to enable consistent semantic representation of MEDS, which is then logically evaluated for spatial and temporal consistency in forming SoS configurations using set-based design principles and Allen's interval algebra. The resulting feasible SoS configurations are then evaluated for mission success using graph theory and multiattribute utility theory. The application of the framework is demonstrated on a simplified and notional sense-decide-effect problem for flexibly accomplishing multiple missions with SoS.","PeriodicalId":55017,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Systems Journal","volume":"18 3","pages":"1549-1559"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10609409","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Systems Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10609409/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mission engineering (ME) is an emerging approach to designing and analyzing configurations of system-of-systems (SoS) for accomplishing one or more missions. ME seeks to flexibly leverage SoS capabilities and dynamically adapt their configuration to meet evolving mission needs. SoS configurations today, however, remain static and are carefully designed to accomplish a mission. The problem we address in this article is developing modeling and analysis techniques for flexible integration and adaptive selection of potential SoS configurations to achieve multiple missions with an overarching agility in the execution space. We propose a foundational framework for ME, complete with semantics and grammar to represent the ME design space (MEDS), along with a set of logical and mathematical modeling approaches that lends the MEDS to robust SoS analytical methods. Specifically, the framework proposes development of a mission-focused ontology and domain-specific language to enable consistent semantic representation of MEDS, which is then logically evaluated for spatial and temporal consistency in forming SoS configurations using set-based design principles and Allen's interval algebra. The resulting feasible SoS configurations are then evaluated for mission success using graph theory and multiattribute utility theory. The application of the framework is demonstrated on a simplified and notional sense-decide-effect problem for flexibly accomplishing multiple missions with SoS.
任务工程和系统分析的概念、数学和分析基础
任务工程(ME)是一种新兴的方法,用于设计和分析用于完成一项或多项任务的系统配置(SoS)。任务工程旨在灵活利用 SoS 的能力,动态调整其配置,以满足不断变化的任务需求。然而,如今的 SoS 配置仍然是静态的,是为完成任务而精心设计的。我们在本文中要解决的问题是开发建模和分析技术,以便灵活集成和自适应选择潜在的 SoS 配置,从而在执行空间中以总体敏捷性完成多种任务。我们为 ME 提出了一个基础框架,其中包含表示 ME 设计空间(MEDS)的语义和语法,以及一套逻辑和数学建模方法,可将 MEDS 借用于稳健的 SoS 分析方法。具体来说,该框架建议开发一种以任务为重点的本体论和特定领域语言,以实现 MEDS 的一致语义表述,然后使用基于集合的设计原则和艾伦区间代数对其进行逻辑评估,以确定在形成 SoS 配置时的空间和时间一致性。然后,利用图论和多属性效用理论对由此产生的可行 SoS 配置进行任务成功率评估。该框架的应用在一个简化和概念化的感知-决定-效应问题上进行了演示,该问题旨在利用 SoS 灵活完成多个任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Systems Journal
IEEE Systems Journal 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
6.80%
发文量
572
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: This publication provides a systems-level, focused forum for application-oriented manuscripts that address complex systems and system-of-systems of national and global significance. It intends to encourage and facilitate cooperation and interaction among IEEE Societies with systems-level and systems engineering interest, and to attract non-IEEE contributors and readers from around the globe. Our IEEE Systems Council job is to address issues in new ways that are not solvable in the domains of the existing IEEE or other societies or global organizations. These problems do not fit within traditional hierarchical boundaries. For example, disaster response such as that triggered by Hurricane Katrina, tsunamis, or current volcanic eruptions is not solvable by pure engineering solutions. We need to think about changing and enlarging the paradigm to include systems issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信