Direct and indirect effects of an invasive ecosystem engineer on a rare herbaceous wetland

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Megan E. Brown, Deborah L. Miller, Ashlynn N. Smith, Barbara M. Cory
{"title":"Direct and indirect effects of an invasive ecosystem engineer on a rare herbaceous wetland","authors":"Megan E. Brown, Deborah L. Miller, Ashlynn N. Smith, Barbara M. Cory","doi":"10.1007/s10530-024-03402-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Feral hogs (<i>Sus scrofa</i>) are invasive, ecosystem engineers and a novel disturbance to rare, fire-dependent, herbaceous wetland ecosystems in Florida, USA. Their feeding activity uproots vegetation, altering plant composition and continuity. Hog rooting can also create linked disturbance by ingesting vegetation critical for fire spread. Herbaceous communities are vulnerable to shrub encroachment when fire return intervals are increased. We examined the impact of hog rooting intensity (% uprooted vegetation) on the resilience of herbaceous, seepage wetland vegetation cover and composition and the effect of hog rooting on fire spread. We hypothesized that (1) vegetation cover and composition would reflect initial intensity of hog rooting and remain altered with and without additional rooting, and (2) reduction of foliar cover by feral hog rooting would reduce fire spread. Total foliar cover, functional group cover, richness, and cover of plant genera were estimated in plots subjected to three intensity levels of hog rooting then appraised inside and outside of exclosures for 7 years. Spatial data was collected to compare areas with and without damage from hogs to areas burned by prescribed fires from 2010–2013. Total foliar cover was reduced for 5 years with high intensity hog rooting compared to no-low intensity rooting. Cover of a keystone, bunchgrass species was reduced with high intensity hog rooting. With repeated rooting, total and graminoid foliar cover were reduced outside exclosures. Fire spread was significantly reduced in areas of hog rooting. These findings have broader implications for conservation of other fire-maintained herbaceous communities impacted by nonindigenous feral hogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9202,"journal":{"name":"Biological Invasions","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03402-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feral hogs (Sus scrofa) are invasive, ecosystem engineers and a novel disturbance to rare, fire-dependent, herbaceous wetland ecosystems in Florida, USA. Their feeding activity uproots vegetation, altering plant composition and continuity. Hog rooting can also create linked disturbance by ingesting vegetation critical for fire spread. Herbaceous communities are vulnerable to shrub encroachment when fire return intervals are increased. We examined the impact of hog rooting intensity (% uprooted vegetation) on the resilience of herbaceous, seepage wetland vegetation cover and composition and the effect of hog rooting on fire spread. We hypothesized that (1) vegetation cover and composition would reflect initial intensity of hog rooting and remain altered with and without additional rooting, and (2) reduction of foliar cover by feral hog rooting would reduce fire spread. Total foliar cover, functional group cover, richness, and cover of plant genera were estimated in plots subjected to three intensity levels of hog rooting then appraised inside and outside of exclosures for 7 years. Spatial data was collected to compare areas with and without damage from hogs to areas burned by prescribed fires from 2010–2013. Total foliar cover was reduced for 5 years with high intensity hog rooting compared to no-low intensity rooting. Cover of a keystone, bunchgrass species was reduced with high intensity hog rooting. With repeated rooting, total and graminoid foliar cover were reduced outside exclosures. Fire spread was significantly reduced in areas of hog rooting. These findings have broader implications for conservation of other fire-maintained herbaceous communities impacted by nonindigenous feral hogs.

Abstract Image

入侵生态系统工程师对稀有草本湿地的直接和间接影响
野猪(Sus scrofa)是一种入侵性生态系统工程师,对美国佛罗里达州稀有的、依赖火源的草本湿地生态系统造成了新的干扰。它们的觅食活动会使植被连根拔起,改变植物的组成和连续性。生根猪还会吞食对火灾蔓延至关重要的植被,从而造成连锁干扰。当火灾重现间隔延长时,草本群落很容易被灌木侵占。我们研究了生猪扎根强度(连根拔起植被的百分比)对草本渗流湿地植被覆盖和组成的恢复能力的影响,以及生猪扎根对火灾蔓延的影响。我们假设:(1) 植被覆盖度和组成将反映生猪扎根的初始强度,并在生猪扎根或不扎根的情况下保持不变;(2) 野猪扎根造成的叶面覆盖度降低将减少火灾蔓延。对受到三种强度野猪扎根的地块进行了叶面总覆盖率、功能群覆盖率、植物丰富度和植物属覆盖率的估算,然后对围栏内外进行了为期 7 年的评估。收集了空间数据,以比较有猪害和无猪害的地区与 2010-2013 年期间被明火焚烧的地区。高强度生猪扎根与无低强度生猪扎根相比,叶片总覆盖面积减少了 5 年。在高强度生猪扎根的情况下,一种关键性的束草物种的覆盖率降低了。反复生根后,围栏外的总覆盖度和禾本科叶片覆盖度都有所降低。生猪扎根区域的火灾蔓延明显减少。这些发现对保护受非本地野猪影响的其他火烧草本群落具有更广泛的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Invasions
Biological Invasions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
248
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Invasions publishes research and synthesis papers on patterns and processes of biological invasions in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine (including brackish) ecosystems. Also of interest are scholarly papers on management and policy issues as they relate to conservation programs and the global amelioration or control of invasions. The journal will consider proposals for special issues resulting from conferences or workshops on invasions.There are no page charges to publish in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信