Association of polyunsaturated fatty acids with cholelithiasis risk and the role of plasma lipid mediators: insights from NHANES 2017-2020 and Mendelian randomization

Yuxuan Chen, Wei Chen, Jin Qian, Xuanchen Jin, Congying Wang, Yihu Zheng
{"title":"Association of polyunsaturated fatty acids with cholelithiasis risk and the role of plasma lipid mediators: insights from NHANES 2017-2020 and Mendelian randomization","authors":"Yuxuan Chen, Wei Chen, Jin Qian, Xuanchen Jin, Congying Wang, Yihu Zheng","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.22.24310765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\nBackground & aims\nPrevious studies have suggested a potential link between polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) intake and the risk of cholelithiasis. Omega–3 fatty acids, a key subfamily of PUFAs, have been identified in observational studies as playing a role in lipid regulation and potentially serving as a protective factor against cholelithiasis. In this study, we aim to investigate this association further by analyzing data from the 2017 – 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and conducting Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses.\nMethods\nWe employed weighted multivariate–adjusted logistic regression analyses to examine the association between PUFAs and cholelithiasis risk using data from NHANES 2017 – 2020. Additionally, a two–sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was conducted utilizing pooled data from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) to establish the causal relationship between PUFAs and cholelithiasis. Following this, we performed two–step MR mediation analyses to investigate the mediating role of plasma lipids in the pathway, focusing on the strongly positive subfamily of PUFAs, Omega–3, in relation to plasma circulating lipids and cholelithiasis.\nResults\nOur observational study in NHANES included 7,527 participants. Weighted multivariate–adjusted logistic regression analyses initially revealed a negative association between PUFAs, their subclasses, and cholelithiasis. However, this association became nonsignificant after adjusting for multiple covariates. In contrast, MR analyses identified a significant negative association between PUFAs (OR=0.75 [95% CI, 0.58~0.98]) and Omega–3 (OR=0.79 [95% CI, 0.7~0.9]) and the risk of cholelithiasis. Specifically, Omega–3 was associated with a reduced risk of developing cholelithiasis (OR=0.77 [95% CI, 0.65~0.91]), possibly due to the upregulation of LDL–C levels (Beta=0.24 [95% CI, 0.1~0.38]). This upregulation of LDL–C subsequently lowered the risk of cholelithiasis (OR=0.77 [95% CI, 0.65~0.91]), with the mediating effect of LDL–C accounting for 28% of the overall association.\nConclusions\nBoth cross–sectional observational analyses and Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses demonstrated a negative correlation between polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and cholelithiasis. Omega–3 fatty acids seem to play a key role in this association by increasing plasma LDL–C levels, which in turn may help reduce the risk of cholelithiasis.","PeriodicalId":501419,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Endocrinology","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.22.24310765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background & aims Previous studies have suggested a potential link between polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) intake and the risk of cholelithiasis. Omega–3 fatty acids, a key subfamily of PUFAs, have been identified in observational studies as playing a role in lipid regulation and potentially serving as a protective factor against cholelithiasis. In this study, we aim to investigate this association further by analyzing data from the 2017 – 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and conducting Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. Methods We employed weighted multivariate–adjusted logistic regression analyses to examine the association between PUFAs and cholelithiasis risk using data from NHANES 2017 – 2020. Additionally, a two–sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was conducted utilizing pooled data from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) to establish the causal relationship between PUFAs and cholelithiasis. Following this, we performed two–step MR mediation analyses to investigate the mediating role of plasma lipids in the pathway, focusing on the strongly positive subfamily of PUFAs, Omega–3, in relation to plasma circulating lipids and cholelithiasis. Results Our observational study in NHANES included 7,527 participants. Weighted multivariate–adjusted logistic regression analyses initially revealed a negative association between PUFAs, their subclasses, and cholelithiasis. However, this association became nonsignificant after adjusting for multiple covariates. In contrast, MR analyses identified a significant negative association between PUFAs (OR=0.75 [95% CI, 0.58~0.98]) and Omega–3 (OR=0.79 [95% CI, 0.7~0.9]) and the risk of cholelithiasis. Specifically, Omega–3 was associated with a reduced risk of developing cholelithiasis (OR=0.77 [95% CI, 0.65~0.91]), possibly due to the upregulation of LDL–C levels (Beta=0.24 [95% CI, 0.1~0.38]). This upregulation of LDL–C subsequently lowered the risk of cholelithiasis (OR=0.77 [95% CI, 0.65~0.91]), with the mediating effect of LDL–C accounting for 28% of the overall association. Conclusions Both cross–sectional observational analyses and Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses demonstrated a negative correlation between polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and cholelithiasis. Omega–3 fatty acids seem to play a key role in this association by increasing plasma LDL–C levels, which in turn may help reduce the risk of cholelithiasis.
多不饱和脂肪酸与胆石症风险的关系及血浆脂质介质的作用:NHANES 2017-2020 和孟德尔随机分析的启示
摘要背景与目的先前的研究表明,多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA)摄入量与胆石症风险之间存在潜在联系。欧米伽-3 脂肪酸是多不饱和脂肪酸的一个重要亚家族,在观察性研究中被确认在血脂调节中发挥作用,并有可能成为胆石症的保护因素。在本研究中,我们旨在通过分析 2017 - 2020 年美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)的数据并进行孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,进一步研究这种关联。方法我们采用加权多变量调整逻辑回归分析,利用 2017 - 2020 年 NHANES 的数据研究 PUFA 与胆石症风险之间的关联。此外,我们还利用全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的汇总数据进行了双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)研究,以确定 PUFA 与胆石症之间的因果关系。随后,我们进行了两步 MR 中介分析,研究血浆脂质在这一途径中的中介作用,重点研究 PUFAs 的强阳性亚家族 Omega-3 与血浆循环脂质和胆石症的关系。加权多变量调整逻辑回归分析最初显示,PUFA 及其亚类与胆石症之间存在负相关。然而,在对多个协变量进行调整后,这种关系变得不显著。相反,MR 分析发现 PUFAs(OR=0.75 [95% CI, 0.58~0.98])和 Omega-3(OR=0.79 [95% CI, 0.7~0.9])与胆石症风险之间存在显著的负相关。具体而言,Omega-3 与胆石症发病风险的降低有关(OR=0.77 [95% CI, 0.65~0.91]),这可能是由于 LDL-C 水平的上调(Beta=0.24 [95% CI, 0.1~0.38])。结论横断面观察分析和孟德尔随机化(MR)分析均表明,多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFAs)与胆石症之间存在负相关。欧米伽-3 脂肪酸似乎在这种相关性中起着关键作用,它能提高血浆低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的水平,进而有助于降低胆石症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信