Sinonasal anatomical findings associated with revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis

Mohamed Fat-hy Khalil, Mohamad Adel Khalifa, Ahmad Moawad Gamea, Fatthe Ali Erfan, Kamal Ebeid
{"title":"Sinonasal anatomical findings associated with revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis","authors":"Mohamed Fat-hy Khalil, Mohamad Adel Khalifa, Ahmad Moawad Gamea, Fatthe Ali Erfan, Kamal Ebeid","doi":"10.1186/s43163-024-00641-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a crucial additional procedure employed in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). It has mostly overtaken the external methods for managing CRS that do not respond to medicinal treatment. Over the years, several instruments have been created to eliminate anatomical obstructions and restore proper function in the sinus drainage pathways. The purpose of this work was to reflect on various anatomical findings after primary functional endoscopic sinus surgery and their relationship with sinus surgery revision. This is a prospective cohort study conducted on 40 participants with CRS. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test version 22 (SNOT-22) was utilized as a measure of results and was filled out by participants both prior to and following their operation (at the 6-month and 12-month intervals). There were multiple anatomical findings encountered in CRS persistence and subsequent need for revision FESS; the most common was incomplete ethmoidectomy (both anterior and posterior) 62.5% (N = 25), and the least common was misplaced antrostomy and partial or full resection of the middle turbinate 7.5% (N = 3). Preoperative total SNOT-22 scoring ranged from 42 to 86 with mean 58.83 ± 12.08, while 6-month postoperative scoring ranged from 10 to 32 with mean 21.48 ± 5.12, and 12-month postoperative scoring ranged from 15 to 37 with mean 28.83 ± 5.52. There was significant improvement (P = 0.001). The ages of patients range between 18 and 62 years. Several common anatomical findings are often found during revision surgeries by analysis of CT scans and endoscopic examination of participants who underwent revision FESS for recurrent or persistent CRS, and this often shows persisting anatomical features or incompletely excised cells that correspond to persistent symptoms and signs of CRS, and the most common was incomplete ethmoidectomy. Also, there was significant improvement regarding outcome measure SNOT-22, 6-month and 12-month period postoperative as contrasted with preoperative scoring.","PeriodicalId":501131,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-024-00641-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a crucial additional procedure employed in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). It has mostly overtaken the external methods for managing CRS that do not respond to medicinal treatment. Over the years, several instruments have been created to eliminate anatomical obstructions and restore proper function in the sinus drainage pathways. The purpose of this work was to reflect on various anatomical findings after primary functional endoscopic sinus surgery and their relationship with sinus surgery revision. This is a prospective cohort study conducted on 40 participants with CRS. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test version 22 (SNOT-22) was utilized as a measure of results and was filled out by participants both prior to and following their operation (at the 6-month and 12-month intervals). There were multiple anatomical findings encountered in CRS persistence and subsequent need for revision FESS; the most common was incomplete ethmoidectomy (both anterior and posterior) 62.5% (N = 25), and the least common was misplaced antrostomy and partial or full resection of the middle turbinate 7.5% (N = 3). Preoperative total SNOT-22 scoring ranged from 42 to 86 with mean 58.83 ± 12.08, while 6-month postoperative scoring ranged from 10 to 32 with mean 21.48 ± 5.12, and 12-month postoperative scoring ranged from 15 to 37 with mean 28.83 ± 5.52. There was significant improvement (P = 0.001). The ages of patients range between 18 and 62 years. Several common anatomical findings are often found during revision surgeries by analysis of CT scans and endoscopic examination of participants who underwent revision FESS for recurrent or persistent CRS, and this often shows persisting anatomical features or incompletely excised cells that correspond to persistent symptoms and signs of CRS, and the most common was incomplete ethmoidectomy. Also, there was significant improvement regarding outcome measure SNOT-22, 6-month and 12-month period postoperative as contrasted with preoperative scoring.
与慢性鼻炎功能性内窥镜鼻窦翻修手术相关的鼻窦解剖发现
功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)是治疗慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)的一种重要补充手术。对于药物治疗无效的慢性鼻窦炎,它已取代了外部治疗方法。多年来,已有多种器械用于消除解剖学上的阻塞,恢复鼻窦引流通道的正常功能。这项工作的目的是反映初级功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术后的各种解剖学发现及其与鼻窦手术翻修的关系。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为 40 名 CRS 患者。参与者在手术前和手术后(间隔 6 个月和 12 个月)都填写了 "鼻窦结果测试 22 版"(SNOT-22)作为衡量结果的指标。在CRS持续存在和随后需要进行FESS翻修的情况中,有多种解剖学发现;最常见的是乙状结肠切除不彻底(包括前部和后部),占62.5%(N = 25),最不常见的是前鼻甲切除错位和中鼻甲部分或全部切除,占7.5%(N = 3)。术前 SNOT-22 总评分从 42 分到 86 分不等,平均值为 58.83 ± 12.08;术后 6 个月评分从 10 分到 32 分不等,平均值为 21.48 ± 5.12;术后 12 个月评分从 15 分到 37 分不等,平均值为 28.83 ± 5.52。患者病情有明显改善(P = 0.001)。患者年龄在 18 岁至 62 岁之间。通过分析因复发性或顽固性 CRS 而接受 FESS 翻修手术的参与者的 CT 扫描和内窥镜检查,发现在翻修手术中经常出现几种常见的解剖学发现,这通常表现为与 CRS 顽固症状和体征相对应的持续解剖学特征或未完全切除的细胞,其中最常见的是乙状结肠切除不完全。此外,与术前评分相比,术后 6 个月和 12 个月的 SNOT-22 评分结果也有明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信