Ashwin Gujrati, Rohit Pradhan, Nimisha Singh, Vibhuti B. Jha, Praveen K. Gupta
{"title":"Adaptive water delineation algorithms for L- and C-band SAR imagery: a comparative analysis","authors":"Ashwin Gujrati, Rohit Pradhan, Nimisha Singh, Vibhuti B. Jha, Praveen K. Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s12145-024-01417-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Water classification in Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images is an ongoing area of research, which has implications in environmental monitoring and water resource management. Adaptive threshold algorithms provide a fast, reliable and efficient way to perform automated water classification, but users often lack awareness on selecting the best algorithm for their specific application. This paper presents a comprehensive assessment of adaptive threshold algorithms for water delineation applied to L- and C-band SAR backscatter images. We introduce a novel approach for dynamic selection of windows within a SAR image to determine optimum thresholds on sigma naught values. A comparison of five threshold-determination techniques is performed which include Otsu, Kittler and Illingworth (KI), Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), Quality Index (QI) and Gamma Maximum Likelihood Estimation (GMLE) algorithms. We observed that, for L-band SAR data, convex hull approach produced better kappa coefficient value with GMM, KI and GMLE algorithms. However, for C-band SAR, kappa coefficients were highest for convex hull method with GMM, KI, QI and GMLE approaches and noticeably higher (> 0.89) when compared to split window approach. Our analysis indicates that the proposed convex hull method for window selection performs better in both L- and C-band SAR images. The results of our analysis will help users in identifying the best adaptive algorithm for water delineation in L- and C-band SAR images.</p>","PeriodicalId":49318,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science Informatics","volume":"414 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01417-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water classification in Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images is an ongoing area of research, which has implications in environmental monitoring and water resource management. Adaptive threshold algorithms provide a fast, reliable and efficient way to perform automated water classification, but users often lack awareness on selecting the best algorithm for their specific application. This paper presents a comprehensive assessment of adaptive threshold algorithms for water delineation applied to L- and C-band SAR backscatter images. We introduce a novel approach for dynamic selection of windows within a SAR image to determine optimum thresholds on sigma naught values. A comparison of five threshold-determination techniques is performed which include Otsu, Kittler and Illingworth (KI), Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), Quality Index (QI) and Gamma Maximum Likelihood Estimation (GMLE) algorithms. We observed that, for L-band SAR data, convex hull approach produced better kappa coefficient value with GMM, KI and GMLE algorithms. However, for C-band SAR, kappa coefficients were highest for convex hull method with GMM, KI, QI and GMLE approaches and noticeably higher (> 0.89) when compared to split window approach. Our analysis indicates that the proposed convex hull method for window selection performs better in both L- and C-band SAR images. The results of our analysis will help users in identifying the best adaptive algorithm for water delineation in L- and C-band SAR images.
合成孔径雷达(SAR)图像中的水分类是一个持续的研究领域,对环境监测和水资源管理具有重要意义。自适应阈值算法为进行自动水分类提供了一种快速、可靠和高效的方法,但用户往往缺乏为其特定应用选择最佳算法的意识。本文全面评估了应用于 L 波段和 C 波段合成孔径雷达反向散射图像的水域划分自适应阈值算法。我们介绍了一种在合成孔径雷达图像中动态选择窗口的新方法,以确定 sigma naught 值的最佳阈值。我们对五种阈值确定技术进行了比较,包括大津算法、基特勒和伊林沃斯算法(KI)、高斯混杂模型算法(GMM)、质量指数算法(QI)和伽马最大似然估计算法(GMLE)。我们观察到,对于 L 波段合成孔径雷达数据,凸壳方法与 GMM、KI 和 GMLE 算法能产生更好的卡帕系数值。然而,对于 C 波段合成孔径雷达数据,凸壳方法与 GMM、KI、QI 和 GMLE 方法的卡帕系数最高,与分割窗口方法相比明显更高(> 0.89)。我们的分析表明,在 L 波段和 C 波段合成孔径雷达图像中,拟议的凸壳方法在窗口选择方面表现更佳。我们的分析结果将有助于用户确定 L 波段和 C 波段合成孔径雷达图像中水域划分的最佳自适应算法。
期刊介绍:
The Earth Science Informatics [ESIN] journal aims at rapid publication of high-quality, current, cutting-edge, and provocative scientific work in the area of Earth Science Informatics as it relates to Earth systems science and space science. This includes articles on the application of formal and computational methods, computational Earth science, spatial and temporal analyses, and all aspects of computer applications to the acquisition, storage, processing, interchange, and visualization of data and information about the materials, properties, processes, features, and phenomena that occur at all scales and locations in the Earth system’s five components (atmosphere, hydrosphere, geosphere, biosphere, cryosphere) and in space (see "About this journal" for more detail). The quarterly journal publishes research, methodology, and software articles, as well as editorials, comments, and book and software reviews. Review articles of relevant findings, topics, and methodologies are also considered.