Educating for change: A meta-analysis of education programs for separating and divorcing parents

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Michael A. Saini, Samantha Corrente
{"title":"Educating for change: A meta-analysis of education programs for separating and divorcing parents","authors":"Michael A. Saini,&nbsp;Samantha Corrente","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Parent education programs have been designed explicitly for separated and divorced parents. These programs typically aim to help parents navigate the challenges of co-parenting, reduce their children's exposure to interparental conflict, and promote their children's well-being post-separation and divorce. Evaluating the effectiveness of parent education programs has been challenging, given the heterogeneity of formats, duration, and settings of these programs. This meta-analytic review aimed to complete a compressive search of relevant studies of parent education programs for separated and divorced parents. Among 40 studies, 103 treatment effects were included across education programs. The overall weighted standardized mean difference across all education programs was 0.24 (CI = 0.14, 0.34, <i>Q</i> = 1274.69, <i>df</i>: 97, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.96.7), but these small effects were not maintained at follow-up (ES 0.00, CI: −0.09, 0.09). Given the considerable heterogeneity across effect sizes, a meta-regression and multiple regressions were computed to assess the influence of moderator variables. This review provides further evidence of the effectiveness of parent education programs. Implications are provided to create evidence-based guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 3","pages":"512-541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.12801","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parent education programs have been designed explicitly for separated and divorced parents. These programs typically aim to help parents navigate the challenges of co-parenting, reduce their children's exposure to interparental conflict, and promote their children's well-being post-separation and divorce. Evaluating the effectiveness of parent education programs has been challenging, given the heterogeneity of formats, duration, and settings of these programs. This meta-analytic review aimed to complete a compressive search of relevant studies of parent education programs for separated and divorced parents. Among 40 studies, 103 treatment effects were included across education programs. The overall weighted standardized mean difference across all education programs was 0.24 (CI = 0.14, 0.34, Q = 1274.69, df: 97, p < 0.001, I2 = 0.96.7), but these small effects were not maintained at follow-up (ES 0.00, CI: −0.09, 0.09). Given the considerable heterogeneity across effect sizes, a meta-regression and multiple regressions were computed to assess the influence of moderator variables. This review provides further evidence of the effectiveness of parent education programs. Implications are provided to create evidence-based guidelines.

Abstract Image

教育促进变革:针对分居和离婚父母的教育计划荟萃分析
家长教育计划是专门为分居和离婚的父母设计的。这些项目通常旨在帮助父母应对共同养育子女的挑战,减少子女与父母之间的冲突,促进子女在分居和离婚后的幸福。由于家长教育计划的形式、持续时间和环境各不相同,因此评估家长教育计划的有效性一直具有挑战性。本荟萃分析综述旨在完成对针对分居和离婚父母的家长教育计划相关研究的压缩搜索。在 40 项研究中,有 103 项教育项目的治疗效果被纳入其中。所有教育项目的总体加权标准化平均差异为 0.24(CI = 0.14, 0.34, Q = 1274.69, df: 97, p < 0.001, I2 = 0.96.7),但这些微小的效果在随访中并未得到维持(ES 0.00, CI: -0.09, 0.09)。鉴于效应大小之间存在相当大的异质性,我们计算了元回归和多元回归,以评估调节变量的影响。本综述进一步证明了家长教育计划的有效性。本综述为制定循证指南提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信