Insect herbivory on Acer rubrum varies across income and urbanization gradients in the D.C. metropolitan area

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Elizabeth Blake, Shelley Bennett, Amy Hruska, Kimberly J Komatsu
{"title":"Insect herbivory on Acer rubrum varies across income and urbanization gradients in the D.C. metropolitan area","authors":"Elizabeth Blake, Shelley Bennett, Amy Hruska, Kimberly J Komatsu","doi":"10.1007/s11252-024-01584-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urbanization has increased wealth disparity within the United States, impacting the urban landscape and species interactions. In particular, the interactions between street trees and the arthropod communities that live among them may be modified by both human population densities across urban to suburban locations, as well as income levels within these areas. We examined the effect of land use type (urban vs. suburban) and median household income on variation in leaf damage and arthropod abundance of red maples (<i>Acer rubrum</i>) in the District of Columbia metropolitan region. We compared these levels of leaf damage to rates observed in a nearby temperate deciduous forest. We predicted leaf damage would be positively correlated with urbanization (forested &lt; suburban &lt; urban) and negatively correlated with neighborhood income level (low &gt; medium &gt; high). Instead, we observed higher levels of leaf damage on trees in the forest environment compared to the urban and suburban areas. Leaves from urban medium and high-income areas were less likely to exhibit herbivore damage than those from suburban areas. Of the leaves with damage, those in urban high-income and suburban low-income areas exhibited the most leaf area missing. These trends may be related to specific factors associated with urbanization and income level, such as impervious surface coverage and tree coverage. This study highlights differences in biotic interactions across individual neighborhoods and the importance of including socio-economic variables when examining species interactions in urban environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48869,"journal":{"name":"Urban Ecosystems","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01584-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urbanization has increased wealth disparity within the United States, impacting the urban landscape and species interactions. In particular, the interactions between street trees and the arthropod communities that live among them may be modified by both human population densities across urban to suburban locations, as well as income levels within these areas. We examined the effect of land use type (urban vs. suburban) and median household income on variation in leaf damage and arthropod abundance of red maples (Acer rubrum) in the District of Columbia metropolitan region. We compared these levels of leaf damage to rates observed in a nearby temperate deciduous forest. We predicted leaf damage would be positively correlated with urbanization (forested < suburban < urban) and negatively correlated with neighborhood income level (low > medium > high). Instead, we observed higher levels of leaf damage on trees in the forest environment compared to the urban and suburban areas. Leaves from urban medium and high-income areas were less likely to exhibit herbivore damage than those from suburban areas. Of the leaves with damage, those in urban high-income and suburban low-income areas exhibited the most leaf area missing. These trends may be related to specific factors associated with urbanization and income level, such as impervious surface coverage and tree coverage. This study highlights differences in biotic interactions across individual neighborhoods and the importance of including socio-economic variables when examining species interactions in urban environments.

Abstract Image

华盛顿特区大都会地区不同收入和城市化梯度的红叶复叶槭上的昆虫食草量各不相同
城市化加剧了美国国内的贫富差距,影响了城市景观和物种之间的相互作用。特别是,行道树与生活在行道树之间的节肢动物群落之间的相互作用可能会受到从城市到郊区的人口密度以及这些地区的收入水平的影响。我们研究了土地利用类型(城市与郊区)和家庭收入中位数对哥伦比亚特区大都会地区红枫(Acer rubrum)叶片损伤和节肢动物数量变化的影响。我们将这些叶片受害程度与在附近温带落叶林中观察到的比率进行了比较。我们预测叶片损伤将与城市化(林区< 郊区< 城市)呈正相关,与社区收入水平(低> 中> 高)呈负相关。相反,与城市和郊区相比,我们观察到森林环境中的树木叶片受损程度更高。与郊区相比,城市中等收入和高收入地区的树叶不太可能受到食草动物的破坏。在受损叶片中,城市高收入地区和郊区低收入地区的叶片缺失面积最大。这些趋势可能与城市化和收入水平相关的特定因素有关,如不透水表面覆盖率和树木覆盖率。这项研究强调了各个社区之间生物相互作用的差异,以及在研究城市环境中物种相互作用时纳入社会经济变量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urban Ecosystems
Urban Ecosystems BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Urban Ecosystems is an international journal devoted to scientific investigations of urban environments and the relationships between socioeconomic and ecological structures and processes in urban environments. The scope of the journal is broad, including interactions between urban ecosystems and associated suburban and rural environments. Contributions may span a range of specific subject areas as they may apply to urban environments: biodiversity, biogeochemistry, conservation biology, wildlife and fisheries management, ecosystem ecology, ecosystem services, environmental chemistry, hydrology, landscape architecture, meteorology and climate, policy, population biology, social and human ecology, soil science, and urban planning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信