Beetle assemblage distribution along edge–forest gradient in a managed oak forest

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Attila Balázs, Jan Bezděk, Jan Šipoš
{"title":"Beetle assemblage distribution along edge–forest gradient in a managed oak forest","authors":"Attila Balázs, Jan Bezděk, Jan Šipoš","doi":"10.1111/afe.12640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Forest management practices creating small‐scale forest edge habitats in managed forests have substantial impacts on the formation of beetle assemblages.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>In 2021, we conducted research in a managed oak woodland in Central Slovakia using three flight interception traps (FITs) to study beetle assemblages. Two FITs were installed at the forest edge, facing both, the clearing and the closed‐stand forest, while the third FIT was positioned 100 m within the closed‐canopy forest. We employed a novel methodological approach, which involved separately collected subsamples within the ecotone using FITs differentiated as ‘ecotone inwards’ and ‘ecotone outwards’ to capture distinct directional movements at the edge.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We recorded 5.997 beetle specimens, encompassing 417 species across 284 genera and 58 families. We found that the species diversity and abundance of beetles were not significantly different between the FITs. However, the species composition was significantly different.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>The partial detrended canonical correspondence analysis suggests that these compositional differences might be closely associated with the distribution of trophic guilds, indicating varied responses to habitat modifications induced by forest edge creation. The results of our study showed that phloephagous, saproxylophagous, xylomycetophagous, xylophagous and zoophagous beetles exhibited a positive association with the forest edge, while mycophagous, phytophagous and saprophagous groups were distinctly associated with the closed‐canopy forest.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Our analyses indicated that the ‘ecotone outward’ part of forest edges of managed forest may attract higher number of trophic groups, while the ‘ecotone inward’ part of the forest edge hosted high abundances of phloephagous and xylomycetophagous species.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":7454,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Entomology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest management practices creating small‐scale forest edge habitats in managed forests have substantial impacts on the formation of beetle assemblages. In 2021, we conducted research in a managed oak woodland in Central Slovakia using three flight interception traps (FITs) to study beetle assemblages. Two FITs were installed at the forest edge, facing both, the clearing and the closed‐stand forest, while the third FIT was positioned 100 m within the closed‐canopy forest. We employed a novel methodological approach, which involved separately collected subsamples within the ecotone using FITs differentiated as ‘ecotone inwards’ and ‘ecotone outwards’ to capture distinct directional movements at the edge. We recorded 5.997 beetle specimens, encompassing 417 species across 284 genera and 58 families. We found that the species diversity and abundance of beetles were not significantly different between the FITs. However, the species composition was significantly different. The partial detrended canonical correspondence analysis suggests that these compositional differences might be closely associated with the distribution of trophic guilds, indicating varied responses to habitat modifications induced by forest edge creation. The results of our study showed that phloephagous, saproxylophagous, xylomycetophagous, xylophagous and zoophagous beetles exhibited a positive association with the forest edge, while mycophagous, phytophagous and saprophagous groups were distinctly associated with the closed‐canopy forest. Our analyses indicated that the ‘ecotone outward’ part of forest edges of managed forest may attract higher number of trophic groups, while the ‘ecotone inward’ part of the forest edge hosted high abundances of phloephagous and xylomycetophagous species.
管理下的橡树林中沿边缘-森林梯度的甲虫群落分布
在人工林中创建小规模森林边缘栖息地的森林管理措施对甲虫群的形成有很大影响。2021 年,我们在斯洛伐克中部一片受管理的橡树林中使用三个飞行截获诱捕器(FIT)进行了甲虫群落研究。其中两个飞行截获诱捕器安装在森林边缘,同时面向空地和郁闭林地,第三个飞行截获诱捕器安装在郁闭林地内 100 米处。我们采用了一种新颖的方法,即使用区分为 "生态区向内 "和 "生态区向外 "的 FIT 在生态区内分别采集子样本,以捕捉边缘处的不同运动方向。我们记录了 5997 个甲虫标本,包括 284 属 58 科 417 个物种。我们发现甲虫的物种多样性和丰度在 FITs 之间没有显著差异。但是,物种组成却有明显差异。部分去趋势典型对应分析表明,这些组成差异可能与营养行会的分布密切相关,表明了对森林边缘营造引起的生境改变的不同反应。我们的研究结果表明,食叶甲虫、食桕甲虫、食木质部甲虫、食木质部甲虫和食动物甲虫与森林边缘呈正相关,而食菌甲虫、食植物甲虫和食液甲虫则与郁闭树冠林明显相关。我们的分析表明,人工林林缘的 "生态区向外 "部分可能会吸引较多的营养群,而林缘的 "生态区向内 "部分则有较多的噬菌和食木质部的物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural and Forest Entomology
Agricultural and Forest Entomology 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Entomology provides a multi-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers can present their work on all aspects of agricultural and forest entomology to other researchers, policy makers and professionals. The Journal welcomes primary research papers, reviews and short communications on entomological research relevant to the control of insect and other arthropod pests. We invite high quality original research papers on the biology, population dynamics, impact and management of pests of the full range of forest, agricultural and horticultural crops.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信