Student Perceptions of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Practices Related to Racism in Behavior-Analytic Graduate Training Programs

IF 1.6 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ryan C. Blejewski, Richelle Hurtado, Sydney R. Batchelder, Casey Irwin Helvey, Carol Pilgrim
{"title":"Student Perceptions of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Practices Related to Racism in Behavior-Analytic Graduate Training Programs","authors":"Ryan C. Blejewski, Richelle Hurtado, Sydney R. Batchelder, Casey Irwin Helvey, Carol Pilgrim","doi":"10.1007/s42822-024-00177-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent literature addressing the development of cultural competencies and antiracism in behavior-analytic graduate training programs has focused primarily on the perspectives of faculty and current practitioners. The present study reports survey data on the perceptions of graduate students actively enrolled in those programs with respect to their racial equity and inclusion practices, as one important dimension of establishing cultural competency. Verified course sequence coordinators in the United States were asked to forward an invitation with an electronic survey link to the students in their programs. Survey questions asked about perceived: (1) racial diversity of fellow students and faculty; (2) race-related experiences during recruitment; (3) inclusion of race-related topics and materials in program curricula and course content; (4) availability and adequacy of resources to support racially diverse graduate students and other diversity efforts; and (5) composition and climate of the campus, department, and program with respect to racial equity and inclusion. Overall, the survey results indicate that there is work still to be done if behavior-analytic training programs are to reflect recommended practices in equity and inclusion for our students and contribute maximally to creating antiracist graduate programs. These findings may stand as a source of some concern in our efforts to prepare developing professionals as culturally competent and antiracist researchers and practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":44553,"journal":{"name":"Behavior and Social Issues","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior and Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-024-00177-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent literature addressing the development of cultural competencies and antiracism in behavior-analytic graduate training programs has focused primarily on the perspectives of faculty and current practitioners. The present study reports survey data on the perceptions of graduate students actively enrolled in those programs with respect to their racial equity and inclusion practices, as one important dimension of establishing cultural competency. Verified course sequence coordinators in the United States were asked to forward an invitation with an electronic survey link to the students in their programs. Survey questions asked about perceived: (1) racial diversity of fellow students and faculty; (2) race-related experiences during recruitment; (3) inclusion of race-related topics and materials in program curricula and course content; (4) availability and adequacy of resources to support racially diverse graduate students and other diversity efforts; and (5) composition and climate of the campus, department, and program with respect to racial equity and inclusion. Overall, the survey results indicate that there is work still to be done if behavior-analytic training programs are to reflect recommended practices in equity and inclusion for our students and contribute maximally to creating antiracist graduate programs. These findings may stand as a source of some concern in our efforts to prepare developing professionals as culturally competent and antiracist researchers and practitioners.

学生对行为分析研究生培训项目中与种族主义有关的多元化、公平和包容做法的看法
最近,有关在行为分析研究生培训项目中培养文化能力和反种族主义的文献主要集中在教师和当前从业者的观点上。本研究报告调查了在这些项目中就读的研究生对其种族平等和包容实践的看法,这是建立文化胜任力的一个重要方面。我们要求美国的认证课程序列协调员向其课程的学生转发一份带有电子调查链接的邀请函。调查问题涉及以下几个方面:(1) 学生和教师的种族多样性;(2) 招生过程中与种族相关的经历;(3) 在课程设置和课程内容中纳入与种族相关的主题和材料;(4) 是否有足够的资源支持种族多样化的研究生和其他多样性工作;(5) 校园、院系和课程在种族平等和包容方面的构成和氛围。总之,调查结果表明,如果行为分析培训项目要反映出我们在平等和包容学生方面所推荐的做法,并为创建反种族主义的研究生项目做出最大的贡献,那么我们还有很多工作要做。这些调查结果可能会引起我们的一些担忧,因为我们正在努力培养专业人才,使他们成为有文化能力和反种族主义的研究者和实践者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior and Social Issues
Behavior and Social Issues PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The primary intellectual framework for Behavior and Social Issues is the science of behavior analysis and its sub-discipline of cultural systems analysis, but contributions from contrasting viewpoints will occasionally be considered if of specific interest to behavior analysts. We recommend that potential authors examine recent issues to determine whether their work is appropriate to the journal. Appropriate contributions include theoretical and conceptual analyses, research articles and brief reports, dialogues, and research reviews. Behavior and Social Issues is an appropriate forum for the work of senior scholars in the field, many of whom serve on the editorial board, as well as for the work of emerging scholars, including students, who have an interest in the contributions of a natural science of behavior to constructing cultures of social justice, human rights, and environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信