Intraluminal pressure in central venous hemodialysis catheters during power injection of contrast media

Nicholas A White, Aart J van der Molen, Ronald WAL Limpens, Jacinta Maas, Koen EA van der Bogt, Tim Horeman, Joris I. Rotmans
{"title":"Intraluminal pressure in central venous hemodialysis catheters during power injection of contrast media","authors":"Nicholas A White, Aart J van der Molen, Ronald WAL Limpens, Jacinta Maas, Koen EA van der Bogt, Tim Horeman, Joris I. Rotmans","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.23.24310903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:\nCentral venous catheters (CVCs) provide direct access to the central circulatory system, commonly used in hemodialysis and intensive care units for drug administration. Although uncertified for the procedure, CVCs are sometimes used for power injection of contrast medium (CM) during CT scans to avoid peripheral intravenous catheter placement. Previous studies suggest this practice is safe, but incidents have been reported. This study aims to measure intraluminal pressure during CM injection through CVCs and assess its impact on the luminal surface to guide responsible clinical use.\nMethods:\nStrain gauges were applied to the exterior walls of four samples from three different types of unused CVCs. These gauges measured material deformation due to intraluminal pressure during CM injections at rates of 4.5 mL/s and 8 mL/s, each performed five times. Strain data were calibrated against known pressures in a static system. The CVCs were then either pressurized until bursting or subjected to microscopic analysis of their luminal surfaces.\nResults:\nIntraluminal pressures measured (97-545 kPa or 14-79 PSI) were below the burst pressure (779-1248 Kpa or 113-181 PSI) in all instances. Strain regression analysis shows a statistically significant (p<0.05) trend over 10 injections in almost all CVCs tested, indicating material fatigue. Surface microscopy revealed surface micro-cracks from repeated injections, suggesting material damage.\nConclusions:\nThe intraluminal pressures from power injections of CM are sufficiently low to prevent CVC bursting. While incidental use for CM injection appears safe, repeated use may cause material damage?","PeriodicalId":501358,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.23.24310903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Central venous catheters (CVCs) provide direct access to the central circulatory system, commonly used in hemodialysis and intensive care units for drug administration. Although uncertified for the procedure, CVCs are sometimes used for power injection of contrast medium (CM) during CT scans to avoid peripheral intravenous catheter placement. Previous studies suggest this practice is safe, but incidents have been reported. This study aims to measure intraluminal pressure during CM injection through CVCs and assess its impact on the luminal surface to guide responsible clinical use. Methods: Strain gauges were applied to the exterior walls of four samples from three different types of unused CVCs. These gauges measured material deformation due to intraluminal pressure during CM injections at rates of 4.5 mL/s and 8 mL/s, each performed five times. Strain data were calibrated against known pressures in a static system. The CVCs were then either pressurized until bursting or subjected to microscopic analysis of their luminal surfaces. Results: Intraluminal pressures measured (97-545 kPa or 14-79 PSI) were below the burst pressure (779-1248 Kpa or 113-181 PSI) in all instances. Strain regression analysis shows a statistically significant (p<0.05) trend over 10 injections in almost all CVCs tested, indicating material fatigue. Surface microscopy revealed surface micro-cracks from repeated injections, suggesting material damage. Conclusions: The intraluminal pressures from power injections of CM are sufficiently low to prevent CVC bursting. While incidental use for CM injection appears safe, repeated use may cause material damage?
动力注射造影剂时中心静脉血液透析导管的腔内压力
背景:中心静脉导管(CVC)可直接进入中心循环系统,常用于血液透析和重症监护病房的给药。虽然中心静脉导管未经认证,但有时会在 CT 扫描期间用于造影剂(CM)的动力注射,以避免外周静脉导管置入。以前的研究表明这种做法是安全的,但也有事故报道。本研究旨在测量通过 CVC 注入 CM 时的管腔内压力,并评估其对管腔表面的影响,以指导临床合理使用。这些应变片测量了在以 4.5 毫升/秒和 8 毫升/秒的速度注入 CM 时腔内压力导致的材料变形,每次测量均进行了五次。应变数据根据静态系统中的已知压力进行校准。结果:测量到的腔内压力(97-545 kPa 或 14-79 PSI)均低于爆破压力(779-1248 Kpa 或 113-181 PSI)。应变回归分析表明,几乎所有接受测试的 CVC 在 10 次注射后都出现了显著的统计学趋势(p<0.05),表明材料出现了疲劳。表面显微镜检查显示,反复注射会产生表面微裂纹,表明材料已损坏。虽然偶然使用中药注射似乎是安全的,但反复使用可能会造成材料损坏?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信