{"title":"We Hereby Refuse: Japanese American Resistance to Wartime Incarceration by Frank Abe and Tamiko Nimura (review)","authors":"Mika Kennedy","doi":"10.1353/wal.2024.a933090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>We Hereby Refuse: Japanese American Resistance to Wartime Incarceration</em> by Frank Abe and Tamiko Nimura <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Mika Kennedy </li> </ul> Frank Abe and Tamiko Nimura, art by Ross Ishikawa and Matt Sasaki, <em>We Hereby Refuse: Japanese American Resistance to Wartime Incarceration</em>. Wing Luke Museum and Chin Music Press, 2021. 151 pp. Paper, $19.95; e-book, $9.95. <p><em>We Hereby Refuse</em> begins with a series of sharp intrusions into the lives of three Japanese Americans coming of age on the West Coast: a domestic afternoon is interrupted by the FBI; a traffic stop turns into an accusation of espionage; and a shopping trip stalls after an accusation of loyalty to the Japanese emperor. These three protagonists, Hajime Jim Akutsu, Hiroshi Kashiwagi, and Mitsuye Endo, are all historical figures who were forcibly removed and incarcerated in the United States' Japanese American incarceration camps during World War II. As one of the most heavily documented topics in twentieth-century western history, Japanese Americans have been able to shift the incarceration narrative from the state's notion of an unfortunate but inevitable wartime necessity to a story of active injustice perpetrated by the United States. But this was not a historical repair executed in hindsight, after the war was over. It has always been ongoing. With its three interwoven stories, <em>We Hereby Refuse</em> spotlights critical early examples of Japanese American resistance—and most importantly, the multitudinous, even contradictory visions of what that \"resistance\" looks like.</p> <p>In a graphic narrative like <em>We Hereby Refuse</em>, to \"look like\" is both a discursive and literally visual quality. Joining an exciting plenitude of recent incarceration graphic texts, among them George Takei's <em>They Called Us Enemy</em> (2019), Kiku Hughes's <em>Displacement</em> (2019), and Molly Murakami's <em>Tide Goes Out</em> (2022), <em>We Hereby Refuse</em> features the work of two different artists with dynamically different illustration <strong>[End Page 89]</strong> styles. Their work in concert emphasizes the polyvocal quality of the text, through which <em>We Hereby Refuse</em> makes clear that however remote the camps or \"alien\" their inhabitants, the state is always present. To experience incarceration is to be in constant negotiation with the many faces of the state, and these negotiations must be met by as many faces of resistance.</p> <p>In Endo's and Akutsu's stories these negotiations are rendered with clean lines, flat colors, and rectangular panels as the US state attempts to put Japanese Americans in boxes both figurative (legislative management) and literal (prison), and Endo and Akutsu respond by using the United States' boxes against itself. Endo brings a court case against the US government as the tactically \"perfect plaintiff\" by the United States' own standards (38)—she doesn't speak Japanese and is not Buddhist or Shinto. Similarly, Akutsu argues he should be ineligible for military draft due to the United States' own claim that he is an \"enemy alien.\" By contrast, Kashiwagi's story plays out in very different visuals—wavering chisel-tipped lines and unbounded grayscale tones slashed with single-color accents. The art refuses easily delineable causalities: firing squads don't result in death, yet signing \"no-no\" on a questionnaire results in imprisonment by the United States, as well as ostracization by one's own community. Birthright citizenship becomes something that can be lost. The state and all its boxes and promises are fragile things.</p> <p>The great strength of <em>We Hereby Refuse</em> is its reminder that there is no singular narrative of refusal, nor universally correct way to meet national injustice, whether by usurpation of the master's tools or via more radical refusals of state conventions. <em>We Hereby Refuse</em> renders Japanese American incarcerees as politicized and political bodies rather than as vague ghosts disappeared to more vague desert. This history is personal; it is political. Its conflicts exist between the people and the US federal government, but also within psyches; within families and communities. Not all actions constitute resistance, however. The Japanese American Citizens League (JACL) emerges as a clear villain in <em>We Hereby Refuse</em>, eager to \"ferret out those disloyal to the government\" and to demonstrate loyalty to the US state with \"<strong>payment in blood</strong>, if necessary\" (53–54; emphasis original). This characterization is a raw subject for the...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":23875,"journal":{"name":"Western American Literature","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western American Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wal.2024.a933090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Reviewed by:
We Hereby Refuse: Japanese American Resistance to Wartime Incarceration by Frank Abe and Tamiko Nimura
Mika Kennedy
Frank Abe and Tamiko Nimura, art by Ross Ishikawa and Matt Sasaki, We Hereby Refuse: Japanese American Resistance to Wartime Incarceration. Wing Luke Museum and Chin Music Press, 2021. 151 pp. Paper, $19.95; e-book, $9.95.
We Hereby Refuse begins with a series of sharp intrusions into the lives of three Japanese Americans coming of age on the West Coast: a domestic afternoon is interrupted by the FBI; a traffic stop turns into an accusation of espionage; and a shopping trip stalls after an accusation of loyalty to the Japanese emperor. These three protagonists, Hajime Jim Akutsu, Hiroshi Kashiwagi, and Mitsuye Endo, are all historical figures who were forcibly removed and incarcerated in the United States' Japanese American incarceration camps during World War II. As one of the most heavily documented topics in twentieth-century western history, Japanese Americans have been able to shift the incarceration narrative from the state's notion of an unfortunate but inevitable wartime necessity to a story of active injustice perpetrated by the United States. But this was not a historical repair executed in hindsight, after the war was over. It has always been ongoing. With its three interwoven stories, We Hereby Refuse spotlights critical early examples of Japanese American resistance—and most importantly, the multitudinous, even contradictory visions of what that "resistance" looks like.
In a graphic narrative like We Hereby Refuse, to "look like" is both a discursive and literally visual quality. Joining an exciting plenitude of recent incarceration graphic texts, among them George Takei's They Called Us Enemy (2019), Kiku Hughes's Displacement (2019), and Molly Murakami's Tide Goes Out (2022), We Hereby Refuse features the work of two different artists with dynamically different illustration [End Page 89] styles. Their work in concert emphasizes the polyvocal quality of the text, through which We Hereby Refuse makes clear that however remote the camps or "alien" their inhabitants, the state is always present. To experience incarceration is to be in constant negotiation with the many faces of the state, and these negotiations must be met by as many faces of resistance.
In Endo's and Akutsu's stories these negotiations are rendered with clean lines, flat colors, and rectangular panels as the US state attempts to put Japanese Americans in boxes both figurative (legislative management) and literal (prison), and Endo and Akutsu respond by using the United States' boxes against itself. Endo brings a court case against the US government as the tactically "perfect plaintiff" by the United States' own standards (38)—she doesn't speak Japanese and is not Buddhist or Shinto. Similarly, Akutsu argues he should be ineligible for military draft due to the United States' own claim that he is an "enemy alien." By contrast, Kashiwagi's story plays out in very different visuals—wavering chisel-tipped lines and unbounded grayscale tones slashed with single-color accents. The art refuses easily delineable causalities: firing squads don't result in death, yet signing "no-no" on a questionnaire results in imprisonment by the United States, as well as ostracization by one's own community. Birthright citizenship becomes something that can be lost. The state and all its boxes and promises are fragile things.
The great strength of We Hereby Refuse is its reminder that there is no singular narrative of refusal, nor universally correct way to meet national injustice, whether by usurpation of the master's tools or via more radical refusals of state conventions. We Hereby Refuse renders Japanese American incarcerees as politicized and political bodies rather than as vague ghosts disappeared to more vague desert. This history is personal; it is political. Its conflicts exist between the people and the US federal government, but also within psyches; within families and communities. Not all actions constitute resistance, however. The Japanese American Citizens League (JACL) emerges as a clear villain in We Hereby Refuse, eager to "ferret out those disloyal to the government" and to demonstrate loyalty to the US state with "payment in blood, if necessary" (53–54; emphasis original). This characterization is a raw subject for the...
We Hereby Refuse: Japanese American Resistance to Wartime Incareration by Frank Abe and Tamiko Nimura (review)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 We Hereby Refuse: Japanese American Resistance to Wartime Incarceration by Frank Abe and Tamiko Nimura Mika Kennedy Frank Abe and Tamiko Nimura, art by Ross Ishikawa and Matt Sasaki, We Hereby Refuse: Japanese American Resistance to Wartime Incarceration。Wing Luke 博物馆和 Chin Music Press,2021 年。151 页。纸质版,19.95 美元;电子书,9.95 美元。我们拒绝战时监禁》以三位在西海岸长大的日裔美国人的生活中发生的一系列尖锐事件开始:一个家庭午后被联邦调查局打断;一次交通拦截变成了间谍指控;一次购物旅行在被指控效忠日本天皇后陷入僵局。这三位主人公--吉姆-阿久津哈吉、柏木浩和远藤光业,都是二战期间被强行遣送到美国日裔美国人监禁营并被监禁的历史人物。作为二十世纪西方历史上记载最多的话题之一,日裔美国人得以将监禁叙事从国家的概念--不幸但不可避免的战时需要--转变为美国主动实施不公正的故事。但这并不是战争结束后事后进行的历史修复。它一直在进行。通过三个交织在一起的故事,《我们在此拒绝》突出了早期日裔美国人抵抗的重要事例--最重要的是,对这种 "抵抗 "的看法多种多样,甚至相互矛盾。在《我们特此拒绝》这样的图画叙事中,"看起来像 "既是一种话语,也是一种视觉特质。与乔治-武井(George Takei)的《他们称我们为敌人》(2019 年)、菊-休斯(Kiku Hughes)的《流离失所》(2019 年)和莫莉-村上(Molly Murakami)的《潮水退去》(2022 年)等近期大量令人兴奋的监禁图画文本一样,《我们在此拒绝》的特色在于两位不同艺术家的作品,他们的插图风格迥异,充满活力 [第 89 页结束]。他们的共同作品强调了文本的多声部特质,通过这些作品,《我们特此拒绝》清楚地表明,无论集中营多么遥远,其居民多么 "陌生",国家始终存在。经历监禁就意味着不断与国家的各种面孔进行谈判,而这些谈判必须以同样多的抵抗面孔来应对。在远藤和阿久津的故事中,这些谈判以简洁的线条、平淡的色彩和长方形的板块呈现,美国政府试图将日裔美国人装进象征性(立法管理)和字面意义(监狱)的盒子里,而远藤和阿久津则利用美国的盒子来对抗自己。根据美国自己的标准(38),远藤作为战术上的 "完美原告 "向法院起诉美国政府--她不会说日语,也不信佛或神道。同样,阿久津也认为自己没有资格应征入伍,因为美国自己声称他是 "敌国人"。相比之下,柏木的故事在截然不同的视觉效果中展开--摇摆不定的凿尖线条和无边无际的灰度色调,再加上单色的点缀。艺术拒绝简单的因果关系:行刑队不会导致死亡,但在问卷上签署 "不同意 "则会导致被美国监禁,以及被自己的社区排斥。与生俱来的公民权变成了可以失去的东西。国家及其所有的框框和承诺都是脆弱的东西。我们特此拒绝》的最大优势在于它提醒人们,无论是通过篡夺主人的工具,还是通过更激进地拒绝国家惯例,都没有单一的拒绝叙事,也没有普遍正确的方式来应对国家的不公正。我们特此拒绝》将日裔美国人作为政治化的政治体,而不是消失在更模糊的沙漠中的模糊幽灵。这段历史是个人的,也是政治的。它的冲突存在于人民与美国联邦政府之间,也存在于心理、家庭和社区内部。然而,并非所有行动都构成抵抗。日裔美国人公民联盟(JACL)在《我们在此拒绝》中是一个明显的恶棍,他们急于 "揪出那些对政府不忠的人",并 "必要时以鲜血为代价"(53-54;着重号为原文所加)来表明对美国国家的忠诚。这一人物形象是《我们在此拒绝》的生动主题。