A Psychometric Evaluation of the Couples’ Financial Communication Scale: Findings and Implications from Two Large, Diverse Samples

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Matthew T. Saxey, Mallory Lucier-Greer, Francesca Adler-Baeder, Ashley B. LeBaron-Black
{"title":"A Psychometric Evaluation of the Couples’ Financial Communication Scale: Findings and Implications from Two Large, Diverse Samples","authors":"Matthew T. Saxey, Mallory Lucier-Greer, Francesca Adler-Baeder, Ashley B. LeBaron-Black","doi":"10.1007/s10834-024-09977-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Communicating about finances is essential to develop shared meaning and goals within couple relationships. When couples struggle to discuss finances, they can experience poor couple outcomes. For researchers and clinicians to effectively study and promote healthy couple communication patterns regarding finances, a parsimonious, reliable, and valid measure of couples’ financial communication is needed. This study examined the psychometric utility of the 5-item <i>Couples’ Financial Communication Scale</i> (originally developed for the <i>Flourishing Families Project</i>; Day, R. D., Bean, R., Coyne, S., Dyer, J., Harper, J., &amp; Walker, L. (2017). Flourishing families project: Survey of family life [codebook].) using two large, diverse samples—one of emerging adult individuals in a romantic relationship (<i>N</i> = 1,950) and another of dyads in a romantic relationship (<i>N</i> = 1,252; 69.9% beyond emerging adulthood). Similar findings emerged across both samples. Inter-item correlations, skewness, and kurtosis of the five items were within acceptable ranges. The five items loaded onto a latent construct with robust standardized factor loadings (ranging from 0.63 to 0.90) and sound model fit. Cronbach’s alpha revealed sound reliability (α = between 0.85 and 0.89). Multiple tests of measurement equivalence suggest the measure appears to be reasonably useful across theoretically meaningful groups (gender, age, income, marital status, and joint banking behaviors). Couples’ financial communication and couples’ relationship quality were positively correlated with large effect sizes—showing initial evidence of predictive validity. The parsimonious <i>Couples’ Financial Communication Scale</i> has sound evidence of reliability, validity, and measurement equivalence across two diverse samples, which positions it to be a useful measure in future scholarship to assess the degree to which couples engage in ongoing healthy and cooperative financial communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":39675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-024-09977-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Communicating about finances is essential to develop shared meaning and goals within couple relationships. When couples struggle to discuss finances, they can experience poor couple outcomes. For researchers and clinicians to effectively study and promote healthy couple communication patterns regarding finances, a parsimonious, reliable, and valid measure of couples’ financial communication is needed. This study examined the psychometric utility of the 5-item Couples’ Financial Communication Scale (originally developed for the Flourishing Families Project; Day, R. D., Bean, R., Coyne, S., Dyer, J., Harper, J., & Walker, L. (2017). Flourishing families project: Survey of family life [codebook].) using two large, diverse samples—one of emerging adult individuals in a romantic relationship (N = 1,950) and another of dyads in a romantic relationship (N = 1,252; 69.9% beyond emerging adulthood). Similar findings emerged across both samples. Inter-item correlations, skewness, and kurtosis of the five items were within acceptable ranges. The five items loaded onto a latent construct with robust standardized factor loadings (ranging from 0.63 to 0.90) and sound model fit. Cronbach’s alpha revealed sound reliability (α = between 0.85 and 0.89). Multiple tests of measurement equivalence suggest the measure appears to be reasonably useful across theoretically meaningful groups (gender, age, income, marital status, and joint banking behaviors). Couples’ financial communication and couples’ relationship quality were positively correlated with large effect sizes—showing initial evidence of predictive validity. The parsimonious Couples’ Financial Communication Scale has sound evidence of reliability, validity, and measurement equivalence across two diverse samples, which positions it to be a useful measure in future scholarship to assess the degree to which couples engage in ongoing healthy and cooperative financial communication.

夫妻财务沟通量表的心理测量学评估:来自两个不同大型样本的研究结果和启示
要在夫妻关系中形成共同的意义和目标,就财务问题进行沟通至关重要。当夫妻在讨论财务问题时陷入困境,他们的夫妻关系就会出现不良后果。为了让研究人员和临床医生有效地研究和促进健康的夫妻财务沟通模式,我们需要一个简洁、可靠和有效的夫妻财务沟通测量方法。本研究考察了 5 项夫妻财务沟通量表(最初为 "幸福家庭项目 "开发;Day, R. D., Bean, R., Coyne, S., Dyer, J., Harper, J., & Walker, L. (2017).幸福家庭项目:家庭生活调查[代码手册]。)使用了两个大型的、多样化的样本--一个是恋爱关系中的新兴成人个体(N = 1,950 人),另一个是恋爱关系中的双人组合(N = 1,252 人;69.9% 已过新兴成人期)。两个样本都有类似的发现。五个项目的项目间相关性、偏度和峰度都在可接受的范围内。这五个项目被加载到一个潜在的结构中,其标准化因子加载(从 0.63 到 0.90 不等)稳健,模型拟合度良好。Cronbach's alpha 显示了良好的可靠性(α = 0.85 到 0.89 之间)。对测量等效性的多重测试表明,该测量方法在理论上有意义的群体(性别、年龄、收入、婚姻状况和共同银行行为)中似乎具有合理的实用性。夫妻财务沟通与夫妻关系质量呈正相关,且影响大小较大--初步证明了预测的有效性。在两个不同的样本中,"夫妻财务沟通量表 "在可靠性、有效性和测量等效性方面都有可靠的证据,这使它在未来的学术研究中成为评估夫妻在财务沟通方面的健康合作程度的有用测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Family and Economic Issues
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Journal of Family and Economic Issues is an interdisciplinary publication that explores the intricate relationship between the family and its economic environment. Peer-reviewed contributions address important issues in family management, household labor and productivity, relationships between economic and non-economic issues including health and healthcare, as well as interrelations between external settings and family life, including family policy, work, and community. The journal features the following types of submissions: original research, critical reviews, brief communications, invited letters to the editor, and reviews of significant books on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信