Assessing the carbon footprint of the agriculture, forestry, and fishing industry of Australia

IF 5.2 4区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Soheil Kazemian, Rashid Zaman, Mohammad Iranmanesh, Zuraidah Mohd Sanusi
{"title":"Assessing the carbon footprint of the agriculture, forestry, and fishing industry of Australia","authors":"Soheil Kazemian, Rashid Zaman, Mohammad Iranmanesh, Zuraidah Mohd Sanusi","doi":"10.1108/sampj-08-2023-0610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study examines the carbon emissions of Australia’s agriculture, forestry and fishing sectors from a consumption perspective to develop effective policy frameworks. The objective is to identify key supply chains, industries and products contributing to these emissions and provide recommendations for sustainable development.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A multiregional input-output lifecycle assessment was conducted using the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform to disaggregate sectors and enable benchmarking against other economic sectors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>In 2018, the “agriculture, forestry, and fishing” sector was responsible for 12.15% of Australia’s carbon footprint. Major contributors included the “electricity, gas, water, and waste” category (26.1%) and the sector’s activities (24.3%). The “transport, postal, and warehousing” sector also contributed 18.4%. Within the industry, the agriculture subsector had the highest impact (71.3%), followed by forestry and logging (15%) and fishing, hunting and trapping (7.6%). Aquaculture and supporting services contributed 6.1%.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The principal constraint encountered by the present study pertained to the availability of up-to-date data. The latest accessible data for quantifying the carbon footprint within Australia’s agriculture, forestry and fishing sector, utilizing the Input-Output analysis methodology through the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform, about 2018.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The findings of this study provide policymakers with detailed insights into the carbon footprints of key sectors, highlighting the contributions from each subsector. This information can be directly used to develop effective emission-reduction policies, with a focus on reducing emissions in utility services, transport and warehousing.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>The study, by raising public awareness of the significant role of industrial agricultural methods in Australia’s carbon footprint and emphasizing the importance of renewable energy and sustainable fuels for electricity generation and road transport, underscores the urgent need for action to mitigate climate change.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study stands out by not only identifying the most impactful industries but also by providing specific strategies to reduce their emissions. It offers a comprehensive breakdown of specific agricultural activities and outlines mitigation strategies for utility services, agricultural operations and transport, thereby adding a unique perspective to the existing knowledge.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":22143,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-08-2023-0610","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines the carbon emissions of Australia’s agriculture, forestry and fishing sectors from a consumption perspective to develop effective policy frameworks. The objective is to identify key supply chains, industries and products contributing to these emissions and provide recommendations for sustainable development.

Design/methodology/approach

A multiregional input-output lifecycle assessment was conducted using the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform to disaggregate sectors and enable benchmarking against other economic sectors.

Findings

In 2018, the “agriculture, forestry, and fishing” sector was responsible for 12.15% of Australia’s carbon footprint. Major contributors included the “electricity, gas, water, and waste” category (26.1%) and the sector’s activities (24.3%). The “transport, postal, and warehousing” sector also contributed 18.4%. Within the industry, the agriculture subsector had the highest impact (71.3%), followed by forestry and logging (15%) and fishing, hunting and trapping (7.6%). Aquaculture and supporting services contributed 6.1%.

Research limitations/implications

The principal constraint encountered by the present study pertained to the availability of up-to-date data. The latest accessible data for quantifying the carbon footprint within Australia’s agriculture, forestry and fishing sector, utilizing the Input-Output analysis methodology through the Australian Industrial Ecology Virtual Laboratory (IELab) platform, about 2018.

Practical implications

The findings of this study provide policymakers with detailed insights into the carbon footprints of key sectors, highlighting the contributions from each subsector. This information can be directly used to develop effective emission-reduction policies, with a focus on reducing emissions in utility services, transport and warehousing.

Social implications

The study, by raising public awareness of the significant role of industrial agricultural methods in Australia’s carbon footprint and emphasizing the importance of renewable energy and sustainable fuels for electricity generation and road transport, underscores the urgent need for action to mitigate climate change.

Originality/value

This study stands out by not only identifying the most impactful industries but also by providing specific strategies to reduce their emissions. It offers a comprehensive breakdown of specific agricultural activities and outlines mitigation strategies for utility services, agricultural operations and transport, thereby adding a unique perspective to the existing knowledge.

评估澳大利亚农业、林业和渔业的碳足迹
目的 本研究从消费角度研究澳大利亚农业、林业和渔业部门的碳排放量,以制定有效的政策框架。设计/方法/途径利用澳大利亚工业生态虚拟实验室(IELab)平台开展了一项多区域投入产出生命周期评估,以对各部门进行分类,并与其他经济部门进行基准比较。研究结果2018年,"农业、林业和渔业 "部门占澳大利亚碳足迹的12.15%。主要贡献者包括 "电力、天然气、水和废物 "类别(26.1%)和该部门的活动(24.3%)。运输、邮政和仓储 "部门也占 18.4%。在工业中,农业分部门的影响最大(71.3%),其次是林业和伐木业(15%)以及渔业、狩猎和捕猎业(7.6%)。本研究遇到的主要制约因素是缺乏最新数据。通过澳大利亚工业生态虚拟实验室(IELab)平台,利用投入产出分析方法对澳大利亚农业、林业和渔业部门的碳足迹进行量化,可获得的最新数据约为 2018 年的数据。实际意义本研究的结果为政策制定者提供了有关关键部门碳足迹的详细见解,突出了各子部门的贡献。社会意义本研究通过提高公众对工业化农业方法在澳大利亚碳足迹中的重要作用的认识,强调可再生能源和可持续燃料在发电和公路运输中的重要性,强调了采取行动减缓气候变化的迫切需要。原创性/价值本研究的突出之处在于,它不仅确定了影响最大的行业,还提供了减少这些行业排放的具体策略。它对具体的农业活动进行了全面细分,并概述了公用事业服务、农业经营和运输的减排战略,从而为现有知识增添了一个独特的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信