OMERACT systemic lupus erythematosus domain survey

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Wils Nielsen , Vibeke Strand , Lee Simon , Ellie Pinsker , Dennisse Bonilla , Eric Morand , Julian Thumboo , Martin Aringer , Marta Mosca , Ian Bruce , Ioannis Parodis , Alfred Kim , Maya Desai , Yvonne Enman , Beverley Shea , Daniel J. Wallace , Yashaar Chaichian , Sandra Navarra , Cynthia Aranow , Meggan Mackay , Zahi Touma
{"title":"OMERACT systemic lupus erythematosus domain survey","authors":"Wils Nielsen ,&nbsp;Vibeke Strand ,&nbsp;Lee Simon ,&nbsp;Ellie Pinsker ,&nbsp;Dennisse Bonilla ,&nbsp;Eric Morand ,&nbsp;Julian Thumboo ,&nbsp;Martin Aringer ,&nbsp;Marta Mosca ,&nbsp;Ian Bruce ,&nbsp;Ioannis Parodis ,&nbsp;Alfred Kim ,&nbsp;Maya Desai ,&nbsp;Yvonne Enman ,&nbsp;Beverley Shea ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Wallace ,&nbsp;Yashaar Chaichian ,&nbsp;Sandra Navarra ,&nbsp;Cynthia Aranow ,&nbsp;Meggan Mackay ,&nbsp;Zahi Touma","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Since the development of the OMERACT Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Core Outcome Set (COS) in 1998, many new SLE domains have been identified and measures developed, creating a need to update the SLE COS. To revisit the 1998 SLE COS and research agenda domains, and generate new candidate domains, we conducted this study of patients with SLE and collaborators.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>(1) To evaluate existing candidate SLE domains for inclusion in the SLE COS. (2) To generate additional candidate SLE domains for COS consideration. (3) To engage SLE collaborators, including patients, in developing the updated SLE COS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The OMERACT SLE Working Group's steering committee developed a survey to assess the importance of candidate SLE domains and generate additional domains for consideration towards the SLE COS. Patients with SLE followed at the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic (patient group) and members of the OMERACT SLE Working Group (collaborator group) were invited to complete the survey between August 2022 and February 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 175 patients were invited and 100 completed the survey. Of 178 collaborators invited, 145 completed the survey. Patients tended to prioritize life-impact domains while collaborators prioritized clinical domains. Both patients and collaborators recommended additional domains to those included in the 1998 SLE COS and research agenda.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The domain inclusion and importance results demonstrate that patients and collaborators prioritize different domains, so capturing the perspectives of both groups is essential to ensure a holistic assessment of SLE. The results of the study identify domains that already have a high level of agreement for potential inclusion in the SLE COS, domains that require further explanation, and novel domains that warrant consideration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 152520"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017224001604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Since the development of the OMERACT Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Core Outcome Set (COS) in 1998, many new SLE domains have been identified and measures developed, creating a need to update the SLE COS. To revisit the 1998 SLE COS and research agenda domains, and generate new candidate domains, we conducted this study of patients with SLE and collaborators.

Objective

(1) To evaluate existing candidate SLE domains for inclusion in the SLE COS. (2) To generate additional candidate SLE domains for COS consideration. (3) To engage SLE collaborators, including patients, in developing the updated SLE COS.

Methods

The OMERACT SLE Working Group's steering committee developed a survey to assess the importance of candidate SLE domains and generate additional domains for consideration towards the SLE COS. Patients with SLE followed at the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic (patient group) and members of the OMERACT SLE Working Group (collaborator group) were invited to complete the survey between August 2022 and February 2023.

Results

A total of 175 patients were invited and 100 completed the survey. Of 178 collaborators invited, 145 completed the survey. Patients tended to prioritize life-impact domains while collaborators prioritized clinical domains. Both patients and collaborators recommended additional domains to those included in the 1998 SLE COS and research agenda.

Conclusion

The domain inclusion and importance results demonstrate that patients and collaborators prioritize different domains, so capturing the perspectives of both groups is essential to ensure a holistic assessment of SLE. The results of the study identify domains that already have a high level of agreement for potential inclusion in the SLE COS, domains that require further explanation, and novel domains that warrant consideration.

OMERACT 系统性红斑狼疮领域调查
自 1998 年开发出 OMERACT 系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)核心成果集(COS)以来,许多新的系统性红斑狼疮领域已被确定并开发出测量方法,从而产生了更新系统性红斑狼疮核心成果集的需求。为了重新审视 1998 年系统性红斑狼疮 COS 和研究议程领域,并产生新的候选领域,我们对系统性红斑狼疮患者和合作者进行了这项研究。(1) 评估现有的系统性红斑狼疮候选领域,以便纳入系统性红斑狼疮 COS。(2)产生更多的系统性红斑狼疮候选领域供 COS 考虑。(3) 让系统性红斑狼疮合作者(包括患者)参与制定更新的系统性红斑狼疮 COS。OMERACT 系统性红斑狼疮工作组的指导委员会制定了一项调查,以评估候选系统性红斑狼疮领域的重要性,并产生更多领域供系统性红斑狼疮 COS 考虑。多伦多大学狼疮诊所的系统性红斑狼疮患者(患者组)和 OMERACT 系统性红斑狼疮工作组成员(合作者组)受邀在 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 2 月期间完成调查。共有 175 名患者受邀,其中 100 人完成了调查。在受邀的 178 名合作者中,有 145 人完成了调查。患者倾向于优先考虑生活影响领域,而合作者则优先考虑临床领域。除了 1998 年系统性红斑狼疮 COS 和研究议程中包含的领域外,患者和合作者还建议增加其他领域。领域的纳入和重要性结果表明,患者和合作者优先考虑的领域不同,因此,要确保对系统性红斑狼疮进行全面评估,就必须掌握这两个群体的观点。研究结果确定了可能纳入系统性红斑狼疮 COS 的共识度较高的领域、需要进一步解释的领域以及值得考虑的新领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信