Clara Kopp, Iria Regueiro, Lars Stoumann‐Jensen, Dorette Müller‐Stöver, David Fangueiro
{"title":"Enhancing phosphorus availability in biochar: Comparing sulfuric acid treatment to biological acidification approaches","authors":"Clara Kopp, Iria Regueiro, Lars Stoumann‐Jensen, Dorette Müller‐Stöver, David Fangueiro","doi":"10.1002/jpln.202300404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe use of sulfuric acid (SA) to acidify biochars is known to enhance their phosphorus (P) fertilizer value. Potentially, biological approaches such as lowering the pH of biochar by lactic acid co‐fermentation or applying biochar with a nitrification inhibitor (NI) to reduce rhizosphere pH are an alternative to SA.AimThis study aimed to evaluate the two methods for increasing plant P availability from two biochars and compare them with SA‐treated biochars (as a reference) in a pot experiment.MethodsMeat and bone meal biochar (MB‐C) and digestate solids biochar (DS‐C) were bio‐acidified (BA) by lactic acid fermentation with organic waste. The untreated, SA‐treated, BA biochars, and biochars co‐applied with a NI (3,4‐dimethylpyrazolephosphate) were tested in a pot experiment with maize.ResultsThe fermentation reduced the pH of the organic waste biochar mixtures to <4.3 and increased water‐extractable P (WEP) to 30% of total P. The untreated biochars had a mineral fertilizer replacement value of >50% and SA increased replacement values to ≈100%. The application of NI did not affect rhizosphere pH or P uptake. The BA MB‐C increased soil solution P concentration, but P uptake did not significantly increase. The application of the BA DS‐C raised soil pH and reduced plant P uptake and biomass.ConclusionThe untreated biochars showed considerable P fertilizer effectiveness, suggesting that acidification may not always be necessary. Rhizosphere acidification and the bio‐acidification of biochars were not effective in further increasing P uptake, despite higher levels of WEP.","PeriodicalId":16802,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202300404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundThe use of sulfuric acid (SA) to acidify biochars is known to enhance their phosphorus (P) fertilizer value. Potentially, biological approaches such as lowering the pH of biochar by lactic acid co‐fermentation or applying biochar with a nitrification inhibitor (NI) to reduce rhizosphere pH are an alternative to SA.AimThis study aimed to evaluate the two methods for increasing plant P availability from two biochars and compare them with SA‐treated biochars (as a reference) in a pot experiment.MethodsMeat and bone meal biochar (MB‐C) and digestate solids biochar (DS‐C) were bio‐acidified (BA) by lactic acid fermentation with organic waste. The untreated, SA‐treated, BA biochars, and biochars co‐applied with a NI (3,4‐dimethylpyrazolephosphate) were tested in a pot experiment with maize.ResultsThe fermentation reduced the pH of the organic waste biochar mixtures to <4.3 and increased water‐extractable P (WEP) to 30% of total P. The untreated biochars had a mineral fertilizer replacement value of >50% and SA increased replacement values to ≈100%. The application of NI did not affect rhizosphere pH or P uptake. The BA MB‐C increased soil solution P concentration, but P uptake did not significantly increase. The application of the BA DS‐C raised soil pH and reduced plant P uptake and biomass.ConclusionThe untreated biochars showed considerable P fertilizer effectiveness, suggesting that acidification may not always be necessary. Rhizosphere acidification and the bio‐acidification of biochars were not effective in further increasing P uptake, despite higher levels of WEP.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1922, the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (JPNSS) is an international peer-reviewed journal devoted to cover the entire spectrum of plant nutrition and soil science from different scale units, e.g. agroecosystem to natural systems. With its wide scope and focus on soil-plant interactions, JPNSS is one of the leading journals on this topic. Articles in JPNSS include reviews, high-standard original papers, and short communications and represent challenging research of international significance. The Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science is one of the world’s oldest journals. You can trust in a peer-reviewed journal that has been established in the plant and soil science community for almost 100 years.
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (ISSN 1436-8730) is published in six volumes per year, by the German Societies of Plant Nutrition (DGP) and Soil Science (DBG). Furthermore, the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (JPNSS) is a Cooperating Journal of the International Union of Soil Science (IUSS). The journal is produced by Wiley-VCH.
Topical Divisions of the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science that are receiving increasing attention are:
JPNSS – Topical Divisions
Special timely focus in interdisciplinarity:
- sustainability & critical zone science.
Soil-Plant Interactions:
- rhizosphere science & soil ecology
- pollutant cycling & plant-soil protection
- land use & climate change.
Soil Science:
- soil chemistry & soil physics
- soil biology & biogeochemistry
- soil genesis & mineralogy.
Plant Nutrition:
- plant nutritional physiology
- nutrient dynamics & soil fertility
- ecophysiological aspects of plant nutrition.