How end-of-life care was limited during the first 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal survey study among healthcare providers (the CO-LIVE study).

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Masha S Zee, H Roeline Pasman, Erica Witkamp, Anne Goossensen, Ida J Korfage, Yvonne N Becqué, Corine Nierop-van Baalen, Agnes van der Heide, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
{"title":"How end-of-life care was limited during the first 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal survey study among healthcare providers (the CO-LIVE study).","authors":"Masha S Zee, H Roeline Pasman, Erica Witkamp, Anne Goossensen, Ida J Korfage, Yvonne N Becqué, Corine Nierop-van Baalen, Agnes van der Heide, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01514-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the way in which end-of-life care was provided, underwent a lot of changes and therefor different domains of end-of-life care were impacted. The aim of this study is to describe whether health care providers considered end-of-life care (in medical, nursing, psychosocial and spiritual care) limited by the pandemic through the first 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and examine associations with COVID-19 related circumstances of care (e.g. visit restrictions) and health care providers' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal survey study among healthcare providers from different healthcare settings who provided end-of-life care during the pandemic's first 18 months. Data of four time periods were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Generalized Estimating Equation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the respondents (n = 302) the majority had a nursing background (71.8%) and most worked in a hospital (30.3%). Especially in the first wave end-of-life care in all aspects was limited according to a substantial part of health care providers (between 29.7 and 57.7%). Psychosocial and spiritual care were more limited than medical and nursing care during all time periods. Care being limited according to health care providers was associated with visit restrictions, shortness of personal protective equipment or restrictions in caring for the deceased and decreased over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic impacted different aspects of end-of-life care throughout the pandemic's first 18 months. Over the course of the pandemic health care providers seemed to have invented ways to adjust their work in order to minimize the effect of limiting measures. More involvement of health care providers in decision-making may improve the prioritization of measures to deal with crisis situations in care. These reflections highlight priorities during crises and the role healthcare providers could play in maintaining good end-of-life care. This remains relevant in new health crises, where care may differ from what is considered good quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01514-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the way in which end-of-life care was provided, underwent a lot of changes and therefor different domains of end-of-life care were impacted. The aim of this study is to describe whether health care providers considered end-of-life care (in medical, nursing, psychosocial and spiritual care) limited by the pandemic through the first 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and examine associations with COVID-19 related circumstances of care (e.g. visit restrictions) and health care providers' characteristics.

Methods: A longitudinal survey study among healthcare providers from different healthcare settings who provided end-of-life care during the pandemic's first 18 months. Data of four time periods were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Generalized Estimating Equation.

Results: Of the respondents (n = 302) the majority had a nursing background (71.8%) and most worked in a hospital (30.3%). Especially in the first wave end-of-life care in all aspects was limited according to a substantial part of health care providers (between 29.7 and 57.7%). Psychosocial and spiritual care were more limited than medical and nursing care during all time periods. Care being limited according to health care providers was associated with visit restrictions, shortness of personal protective equipment or restrictions in caring for the deceased and decreased over time.

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted different aspects of end-of-life care throughout the pandemic's first 18 months. Over the course of the pandemic health care providers seemed to have invented ways to adjust their work in order to minimize the effect of limiting measures. More involvement of health care providers in decision-making may improve the prioritization of measures to deal with crisis situations in care. These reflections highlight priorities during crises and the role healthcare providers could play in maintaining good end-of-life care. This remains relevant in new health crises, where care may differ from what is considered good quality of care.

在 COVID-19 大流行的前 18 个月中,临终关怀是如何受到限制的:一项针对医疗服务提供者的纵向调查研究(CO-LIVE 研究)。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,提供临终关怀的方式发生了很大变化,因此临终关怀的不同领域都受到了影响。本研究旨在描述在 COVID-19 大流行的前 18 个月中,医疗服务提供者是否认为临终关怀(医疗、护理、社会心理和精神关怀)受到了大流行的限制,并研究与 COVID-19 相关的护理环境(如就诊限制)和医疗服务提供者特征之间的关联:方法:对在大流行的前 18 个月中提供临终关怀服务的不同医疗机构的医疗服务提供者进行纵向调查研究。采用描述性统计和广义估计方程对四个时间段的数据进行了分析:在受访者(n = 302)中,大多数人有护理背景(71.8%),大多数人在医院工作(30.3%)。特别是在第一轮调查中,大部分医疗服务提供者(29.7% 至 57.7%)认为临终关怀的各个方面都很有限。在所有时间段内,社会心理和精神护理都比医疗和护理更加有限。医疗服务提供者所提供的护理受到限制与就诊限制、个人防护设备短缺或对死者的护理受到限制有关,并且随着时间的推移而减少:COVID-19大流行在大流行的前18个月中对临终关怀的不同方面产生了影响。在大流行期间,医疗服务提供者似乎发明了一些调整工作的方法,以便将限制性措施的影响降至最低。让医疗服务提供者更多地参与决策,可能会提高应对护理危机情况的措施的优先级。这些思考强调了危机期间的优先事项以及医疗服务提供者在保持良好的临终关怀方面可以发挥的作用。这一点在新的健康危机中仍然具有现实意义,因为危机中的护理可能不同于被认为是优质的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信