Examining the Sustainability of Core Capacity and Evidence-Based Interventions for FIT-Based CRC Screening: California Colorectal Cancer Control Program.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ndukaku Omelu, Marilyn Kempster, LeeAnn Velasquez, Jessica Nunez de Ybarra, Renato Littaua, Shauntay Davis-Patterson, Marco Coelho, Brendan Darsie, June Hunter, Celena Donahue, Socorro Carrillo, Raquel Arias, Sonia Pinal
{"title":"Examining the Sustainability of Core Capacity and Evidence-Based Interventions for FIT-Based CRC Screening: California Colorectal Cancer Control Program.","authors":"Ndukaku Omelu, Marilyn Kempster, LeeAnn Velasquez, Jessica Nunez de Ybarra, Renato Littaua, Shauntay Davis-Patterson, Marco Coelho, Brendan Darsie, June Hunter, Celena Donahue, Socorro Carrillo, Raquel Arias, Sonia Pinal","doi":"10.1177/10732748241255218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examined the extent to which funded satellite clinics could sustain the California Colon Cancer Control Program (C4P) strategies implemented in health systems to increase uptake of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the absence of future C4P funds.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Seven health systems consisting of 38 satellite clinics participated in C4P to examine the sustainability of the program in the absence future Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quantitative and qualitative methods with a close and open-ended survey approach, and a prospective cohort design were used to examine the sustainability of the C4P in health systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61% of satellite clinics could not sustain funding stability. Only 26% could sustain funding stability. About, 71%, 26%, and 21% of the satellite clinics could sustain the small media platform, patient navigation services, and community health workers (CHWs), respectively. All the satellite clinics sustained the provider reminder system and professional development. Roughly, 71% and 42% of funded satellite clinics could not sustain the patient navigators and CHWs, respectively. The satellite clinics that could sustain funding stability, sustained patient navigation services and CHWs. Health systems that could not sustain funding stability, could not sustain patient navigation services and CHWs. Qualitatively, the need to support uninsured priority populations, health educators, patient navigators, care coordination activities, outreach services, and provision of enhanced services emerged. The need to support enhanced quality measures, expansion of funding, Medi-Cal Public Hospital Redesign and Incentive coverage, health plan, community linkages, resource sharing, and best practices specifically on CRC screening emerged. Themes such as automated reminder, limited personalized care delivery and capacity, transportation barriers, staff salary, expansion of care through patient navigation, and culturally appropriate media campaign also emerged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, to address sustainability barriers, funding stability should be maintained in the health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11282556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241255218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We examined the extent to which funded satellite clinics could sustain the California Colon Cancer Control Program (C4P) strategies implemented in health systems to increase uptake of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the absence of future C4P funds.

Introduction: Seven health systems consisting of 38 satellite clinics participated in C4P to examine the sustainability of the program in the absence future Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funding.

Methods: Quantitative and qualitative methods with a close and open-ended survey approach, and a prospective cohort design were used to examine the sustainability of the C4P in health systems.

Results: A total of 61% of satellite clinics could not sustain funding stability. Only 26% could sustain funding stability. About, 71%, 26%, and 21% of the satellite clinics could sustain the small media platform, patient navigation services, and community health workers (CHWs), respectively. All the satellite clinics sustained the provider reminder system and professional development. Roughly, 71% and 42% of funded satellite clinics could not sustain the patient navigators and CHWs, respectively. The satellite clinics that could sustain funding stability, sustained patient navigation services and CHWs. Health systems that could not sustain funding stability, could not sustain patient navigation services and CHWs. Qualitatively, the need to support uninsured priority populations, health educators, patient navigators, care coordination activities, outreach services, and provision of enhanced services emerged. The need to support enhanced quality measures, expansion of funding, Medi-Cal Public Hospital Redesign and Incentive coverage, health plan, community linkages, resource sharing, and best practices specifically on CRC screening emerged. Themes such as automated reminder, limited personalized care delivery and capacity, transportation barriers, staff salary, expansion of care through patient navigation, and culturally appropriate media campaign also emerged.

Conclusion: Overall, to address sustainability barriers, funding stability should be maintained in the health systems.

研究基于 FIT 的 CRC 筛查的核心能力和循证干预措施的可持续性:加州结直肠癌控制计划》。
目标:我们研究了在未来 C4P 资金缺乏的情况下,受资助的卫星诊所能在多大程度上维持加州结肠癌控制计划 (C4P) 在医疗系统中实施的策略,以提高粪便免疫化学检验 (FIT) 或免疫化学粪便潜血检验 (iFOBT) 在结肠直肠癌 (CRC) 筛查中的使用率:由 38 家卫星诊所组成的 7 个医疗系统参与了 C4P 项目,以研究在未来缺乏疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)资金支持的情况下该项目能否持续开展:方法:采用定量和定性方法、封闭式和开放式调查方法以及前瞻性队列设计来考察 C4P 在卫生系统中的可持续性:结果:共有 61% 的卫星诊所无法维持资金的稳定性。结果:共有 61% 的卫星诊所无法维持资金的稳定性,只有 26% 可以维持资金的稳定性。大约分别有 71%、26% 和 21% 的卫星诊所能够维持小型媒体平台、患者导航服务和社区保健员 (CHW)。所有卫星诊所都能维持医疗服务提供者提醒系统和专业发展。大约分别有 71% 和 42% 的受资助卫星诊所无法维持患者导航员和社区保健员的工作。能够维持资金稳定的卫星诊所维持了患者导航服务和社区保健工作者。无法维持资金稳定性的医疗系统无法维持患者导航服务和社区保健工作者。在定性方面,出现了支持未参保重点人群、健康教育者、患者导航员、护理协调活动、外联服务和提供强化服务的需求。需要支持强化质量措施、扩大资金、加州医保公立医院重新设计和奖励覆盖范围、健康计划、社区联系、资源共享,以及专门针对 CRC 筛查的最佳实践。此外,还出现了自动提醒、个性化护理服务和能力有限、交通障碍、员工工资、通过患者导航扩大护理范围以及文化上适当的媒体宣传等主题:总体而言,要解决可持续性障碍,医疗系统应保持资金的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Control
Cancer Control ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信