Inter-Rater and Intrarater Reliability of Radiographs in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Scaphoid Fractures.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1177/15589447241257705
Stefan Padeanu, Ken Tang, Kerri Highmore, Khaldoun Koujok, Sasha Carsen, Kevin Smit, Kevin Cheung
{"title":"Inter-Rater and Intrarater Reliability of Radiographs in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Scaphoid Fractures.","authors":"Stefan Padeanu, Ken Tang, Kerri Highmore, Khaldoun Koujok, Sasha Carsen, Kevin Smit, Kevin Cheung","doi":"10.1177/15589447241257705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric scaphoid fractures can be challenging to diagnose on plain radiograph. Rates of missed scaphoid fractures can be as high as 30% to 37% on initial imaging and overall sensitivity ranging from 21% to 97%. Few studies, however, have examined the reliability of radiographs in the diagnosis of scaphoid fractures, and none are specific to the pediatric population. Reliability, both between different specialists and for individual raters, may elucidate some of the diagnostic challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 2-iteration survey of pediatric orthopedic surgeons, plastic surgeons, radiologists, and emergency physicians at a tertiary children's hospital. Participants were asked to assess 10 series of pediatric wrist radiographs for evidence of scaphoid fracture. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient of 2.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two respondents were included in the first iteration analysis. Inter-rater reliability between surgeons (0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.87), radiologists (0.76; 0.55-0.92), and emergency physicians (0.65; 0.46-0.86) was \"good\" to \"excellent.\" Twenty-six respondents participated in the second iteration for intrarater reliability (0.73; 0.67-0.78). Sensitivity (0.75; 0.69-0.81) and specificity (0.78; 0.71-0.83) of wrist radiographs for diagnosing scaphoid fractures were consistent with results in other studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both inter-rater and intrarater reliability for diagnosing pediatric scaphoid fractures on radiographs was good to excellent. No significant difference was found between specialists. Plain radiographs, while useful for obvious scaphoid fractures, are unable to reliably rule out subtle fractures routinely. Our study demonstrates that poor sensitivity stems from the test itself, and not rater variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"1101-1108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241257705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric scaphoid fractures can be challenging to diagnose on plain radiograph. Rates of missed scaphoid fractures can be as high as 30% to 37% on initial imaging and overall sensitivity ranging from 21% to 97%. Few studies, however, have examined the reliability of radiographs in the diagnosis of scaphoid fractures, and none are specific to the pediatric population. Reliability, both between different specialists and for individual raters, may elucidate some of the diagnostic challenges.

Methods: We conducted a 2-iteration survey of pediatric orthopedic surgeons, plastic surgeons, radiologists, and emergency physicians at a tertiary children's hospital. Participants were asked to assess 10 series of pediatric wrist radiographs for evidence of scaphoid fracture. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient of 2.1.

Results: Forty-two respondents were included in the first iteration analysis. Inter-rater reliability between surgeons (0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.87), radiologists (0.76; 0.55-0.92), and emergency physicians (0.65; 0.46-0.86) was "good" to "excellent." Twenty-six respondents participated in the second iteration for intrarater reliability (0.73; 0.67-0.78). Sensitivity (0.75; 0.69-0.81) and specificity (0.78; 0.71-0.83) of wrist radiographs for diagnosing scaphoid fractures were consistent with results in other studies.

Conclusions: Both inter-rater and intrarater reliability for diagnosing pediatric scaphoid fractures on radiographs was good to excellent. No significant difference was found between specialists. Plain radiographs, while useful for obvious scaphoid fractures, are unable to reliably rule out subtle fractures routinely. Our study demonstrates that poor sensitivity stems from the test itself, and not rater variability.

诊断小儿肩胛骨骨折时X光片的评定者间和评定者内可靠性。
背景:小儿肩胛骨骨折在X光平片上很难诊断。初次影像学检查的肩胛骨骨折漏诊率高达 30% 至 37%,总体敏感性为 21% 至 97%。然而,很少有研究对X光片诊断肩胛骨骨折的可靠性进行研究,也没有专门针对儿科人群的研究。不同专家之间以及单个评定者之间的可靠性可能会说明一些诊断难题:我们对一家三级儿童医院的小儿骨科医生、整形外科医生、放射科医生和急诊科医生进行了两次迭代调查。我们要求参与者对 10 张小儿腕部 X 光片进行评估,以寻找肩胛骨骨折的证据。采用类内相关系数 2.1 计算评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性:有 42 名受访者参加了第一次迭代分析。外科医生(0.66;95% 置信区间,0.43-0.87)、放射科医生(0.76;0.55-0.92)和急诊科医生(0.65;0.46-0.86)之间的评分者间可靠性为 "良好 "至 "优秀"。有 26 名受访者参与了第二次迭代,其内部评分可靠性(0.73;0.67-0.78)为 "良好 "至 "优秀"。腕部X光片诊断肩胛骨骨折的敏感性(0.75;0.69-0.81)和特异性(0.78;0.71-0.83)与其他研究结果一致:结论:根据X光片诊断小儿肩胛骨骨折的评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性均为良好至优秀。专家之间没有明显差异。平片虽然对明显的肩胛骨骨折有用,但无法可靠地常规排除细微骨折。我们的研究表明,灵敏度差源于测试本身,而非评分者的差异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信