An 8-week physiotherapist-led return to sport group program after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improves measures of physical and psychological function: A case series

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Adam Walker , Larissa Sattler , Samuel Heyward , Jordan Tedesco , Zachariah Jones , Corey D'Lima , Caroline Higham , Sophie Cuthbert , Wayne Hing
{"title":"An 8-week physiotherapist-led return to sport group program after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improves measures of physical and psychological function: A case series","authors":"Adam Walker ,&nbsp;Larissa Sattler ,&nbsp;Samuel Heyward ,&nbsp;Jordan Tedesco ,&nbsp;Zachariah Jones ,&nbsp;Corey D'Lima ,&nbsp;Caroline Higham ,&nbsp;Sophie Cuthbert ,&nbsp;Wayne Hing","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Low return to competitive sport, high reinjury rates and long-term functional impairment of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) present significant challenges for patients. A program that facilitates a safe return to sport (RTS) following ACLR could potentially improve outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Case Series.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty participants (median 20-years-old (13–36), 43 males, 18 females, median 7.5 months (4–25) post-ACLR) completed an eight-week exercise program. A battery of physical tests and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed pre and post-program. The number of participants passing RTS criteria was evaluated, and RTS rates were determined. The correlation between the ACL-RSI and measures of physical function was explored.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Improvements in all isometric strength, hop tests, running T-test, and patient reported outcome measures were seen post-program. Five (8%) participants successfully passed all RTS criteria and eighty-five percent of participants returned to their previous level of sport. The ACL-RSI and the IKDC showed correlation across all time points (pre rs = 0.49; post rs = 0.40; change r = 0.40).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study demonstrated improvements in all RTS criteria tests upon completing the 8-week rehabilitation program; however, few participants (8%) passed all RTS criteria. Psychological readiness is more closely related to patient-reported function than functional tests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 103149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Low return to competitive sport, high reinjury rates and long-term functional impairment of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) present significant challenges for patients. A program that facilitates a safe return to sport (RTS) following ACLR could potentially improve outcomes.

Study design

Case Series.

Methods

Sixty participants (median 20-years-old (13–36), 43 males, 18 females, median 7.5 months (4–25) post-ACLR) completed an eight-week exercise program. A battery of physical tests and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed pre and post-program. The number of participants passing RTS criteria was evaluated, and RTS rates were determined. The correlation between the ACL-RSI and measures of physical function was explored.

Results

Improvements in all isometric strength, hop tests, running T-test, and patient reported outcome measures were seen post-program. Five (8%) participants successfully passed all RTS criteria and eighty-five percent of participants returned to their previous level of sport. The ACL-RSI and the IKDC showed correlation across all time points (pre rs = 0.49; post rs = 0.40; change r = 0.40).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated improvements in all RTS criteria tests upon completing the 8-week rehabilitation program; however, few participants (8%) passed all RTS criteria. Psychological readiness is more closely related to patient-reported function than functional tests.

在前十字韧带重建术后,由理疗师指导的为期 8 周的重返运动集体计划可改善身体和心理功能的测量:病例系列。
背景:前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后,竞技运动恢复率低、再损伤率高以及长期功能障碍是患者面临的重大挑战。研究设计:病例系列:研究设计:病例系列:60名参与者(中位数20岁(13-36岁),43名男性,18名女性,中位数ACLR术后7.5个月(4-25个月))完成了为期八周的锻炼计划。计划前后对一系列身体测试和患者报告的结果进行了评估。评估了通过 RTS 标准的参与者人数,并确定了 RTS 率。此外,还探讨了 ACL-RSI 与身体功能测量之间的相关性:结果:项目结束后,所有等长力量、跳跃测试、跑步 T 测试和患者报告结果指标均有所改善。五名参与者(8%)成功通过了所有 RTS 标准,85% 的参与者恢复到了之前的运动水平。ACL-RSI 和 IKDC 在所有时间点都显示出相关性(前 rs = 0.49;后 rs = 0.40;变化 r = 0.40):我们的研究表明,在完成为期 8 周的康复计划后,所有 RTS 标准测试均有所改善;但是,只有少数参与者(8%)通过了所有 RTS 标准测试。与功能测试相比,心理准备与患者报告的功能关系更为密切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信