Exploring Older Adults' Subjective Views on Aging Positively: Development and Validation of the Positive Aging Scale.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Miriam Sang-Ah Park, Stephen Badham, Samuel Vizcaino-Vickers, Emanuele Fino
{"title":"Exploring Older Adults' Subjective Views on Aging Positively: Development and Validation of the Positive Aging Scale.","authors":"Miriam Sang-Ah Park, Stephen Badham, Samuel Vizcaino-Vickers, Emanuele Fino","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Historically, aging research has focused primarily on health deterioration and negative aspects associated with aging. This has limited the scope of our understanding of the experience of aging and the relationships between aging and well-being from an integrative biopsychosocial perspective. In the same vein, there is a lack of reliable and valid assessments of aging that capture the positive aspects that characterize and improve the subjective experience of this period of life, particularly one that focuses on psychosocial well-being, including meaningful experiences and activities, group memberships, and general abilities. This study presents the development and validation of the Positive Aging Scale (PAS), a novel self-report assessment.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was an online cross-sectional study conducted on 501 UK residents aged ≥60 years. A number of self-reported items and measures of positive aging, general health, well-being, and cognitive functioning were administered to the sample. We used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and assessed the dimensionality, reliability, and concurrent criterion-related validity of the PAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results suggested that a unidimensional solution represents the data well, with the positive aging factor adequately loading on 8 items, and the solution showing factorial invariance between young-old and old participants (i.e., ≥75 years). Total PAS scores positively correlate with general health, well-being, and cognitive functioning.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The PAS demonstrated strong psychometric properties and the findings highlight correlations between the PAS and key outcomes of positive aging, including general health. Implications for research and interventions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Historically, aging research has focused primarily on health deterioration and negative aspects associated with aging. This has limited the scope of our understanding of the experience of aging and the relationships between aging and well-being from an integrative biopsychosocial perspective. In the same vein, there is a lack of reliable and valid assessments of aging that capture the positive aspects that characterize and improve the subjective experience of this period of life, particularly one that focuses on psychosocial well-being, including meaningful experiences and activities, group memberships, and general abilities. This study presents the development and validation of the Positive Aging Scale (PAS), a novel self-report assessment.

Research design and methods: This was an online cross-sectional study conducted on 501 UK residents aged ≥60 years. A number of self-reported items and measures of positive aging, general health, well-being, and cognitive functioning were administered to the sample. We used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and assessed the dimensionality, reliability, and concurrent criterion-related validity of the PAS.

Results: The results suggested that a unidimensional solution represents the data well, with the positive aging factor adequately loading on 8 items, and the solution showing factorial invariance between young-old and old participants (i.e., ≥75 years). Total PAS scores positively correlate with general health, well-being, and cognitive functioning.

Discussion and implications: The PAS demonstrated strong psychometric properties and the findings highlight correlations between the PAS and key outcomes of positive aging, including general health. Implications for research and interventions are discussed.

探索老年人对积极老龄化的主观看法:积极老龄化量表的开发与验证。
背景和目的:从历史上看,老龄化研究主要集中在与老龄化相关的健康恶化和消极方面。这限制了我们从综合生物-心理-社会角度对衰老体验以及衰老与幸福之间关系的理解范围。同样,我们也缺乏可靠、有效的老龄化评估,这些评估能够捕捉老龄化的积极方面,并改善这一时期生活的主观体验,特别是侧重于社会心理健康的评估,包括有意义的经历和活动、团体成员资格和一般能力。本研究介绍了积极老龄化量表(PAS)的开发和验证情况,这是一种新颖的自我报告评估方法:这是一项在线横断面研究,研究对象为 501 名年龄≥ 60 岁的英国居民。对样本进行了一系列自我报告项目和积极老龄化、一般健康、幸福感和认知功能的测量。我们使用了探索性和确认性因素分析,评估了 PAS 的维度、可靠性和并行标准相关有效性:结果表明,单维度解法很好地代表了数据,积极的老龄化因子在八个项目上有充分的负荷,而且该解法在年轻参与者和老年参与者(即年龄≥ 75 岁)之间表现出因子不变性。PAS 总分与总体健康、幸福感和认知功能呈正相关:PAS 具有很强的心理测量特性,研究结果突出了 PAS 与积极老龄化的主要结果(包括总体健康状况)之间的相关性。本文还讨论了研究和干预措施的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信