Quantification of the Engraftment Status of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Glioma Using Dual-Modality Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Bioluminescence Imaging.
IF 3.8 2区 医学Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Quantification of the Engraftment Status of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Glioma Using Dual-Modality Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Bioluminescence Imaging.","authors":"Minghui Cao, Yunhua Li, Yingmei Tang, Meiwei Chen, Jiaji Mao, Xieqing Yang, Dongye Li, Fang Zhang, Jun Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>The tumor-tropic properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) enable them to serve as appealing cellular vehicles for delivering therapeutic agents to treat malignant glioma. However, the exact engraftment status of MSCs in glioma via different administration routes remains unclear due to the lack of quantitative analysis. This study aimed to quantify the engraftment of MSCs in glioma after administration via different routes using non-invasive dual-modality magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bioluminescence imaging (BLI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>MSCs were transduced with a lentivirus overexpressing ferritin heavy chain (FTH) and firefly luciferase (FLUC) reporter genes to yield FTH- and FLUC-overexpressed MSCs (FTH-FLUC-MSCs). Wistar rats bearing intracranial C6 glioma received peritumoral, intratumoral, intra-arterial, and intravenous injection of FTH-FLUC-MSCs, respectively. MRI and BLI were performed to monitor FTH-FLUC-MSCs in vivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FTH-FLUC-MSCs administered via peritumoral, intratumoral and intra-arterial routes migrated specially toward the intracranial glioma in vivo, as detected by MRI and BLI. As quantified by the BLI signal intensity, the percentages of FTH-FLUC-MSCs in the glioma were significantly higher with peritumoral injection (61%) and intratumoral injection (71%) compared to intra-arterial injection (30%) and intravenous injection (0%). Peritumorally injected FTH-FLUC-MSCs showed a gradual decline, with approximately 6% of FTH-FLUC-MSCs still retained within the tumor up to 11 days after injection. Meanwhile, the number of FTH-FLUC-MSCs injected via other routes dropped quickly, and none were detectable by day 11 post-injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peritumoral delivery of FTH-FLUC-MSCs offers robust engraftment and could be used as the optimal delivery route for treating malignant glioma.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"334-346"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.07.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: The tumor-tropic properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) enable them to serve as appealing cellular vehicles for delivering therapeutic agents to treat malignant glioma. However, the exact engraftment status of MSCs in glioma via different administration routes remains unclear due to the lack of quantitative analysis. This study aimed to quantify the engraftment of MSCs in glioma after administration via different routes using non-invasive dual-modality magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bioluminescence imaging (BLI).
Materials and methods: MSCs were transduced with a lentivirus overexpressing ferritin heavy chain (FTH) and firefly luciferase (FLUC) reporter genes to yield FTH- and FLUC-overexpressed MSCs (FTH-FLUC-MSCs). Wistar rats bearing intracranial C6 glioma received peritumoral, intratumoral, intra-arterial, and intravenous injection of FTH-FLUC-MSCs, respectively. MRI and BLI were performed to monitor FTH-FLUC-MSCs in vivo.
Results: FTH-FLUC-MSCs administered via peritumoral, intratumoral and intra-arterial routes migrated specially toward the intracranial glioma in vivo, as detected by MRI and BLI. As quantified by the BLI signal intensity, the percentages of FTH-FLUC-MSCs in the glioma were significantly higher with peritumoral injection (61%) and intratumoral injection (71%) compared to intra-arterial injection (30%) and intravenous injection (0%). Peritumorally injected FTH-FLUC-MSCs showed a gradual decline, with approximately 6% of FTH-FLUC-MSCs still retained within the tumor up to 11 days after injection. Meanwhile, the number of FTH-FLUC-MSCs injected via other routes dropped quickly, and none were detectable by day 11 post-injection.
Conclusion: Peritumoral delivery of FTH-FLUC-MSCs offers robust engraftment and could be used as the optimal delivery route for treating malignant glioma.
理由和目标:间充质干细胞(MSCs)的致瘤特性使其能够作为一种有吸引力的细胞载体,用于输送治疗恶性胶质瘤的药物。然而,由于缺乏定量分析,间充质干细胞通过不同给药途径在胶质瘤中的确切移植状况仍不清楚。本研究旨在利用非侵入性双模态磁共振成像(MRI)和生物发光成像(BLI)定量分析间充质干细胞通过不同途径给药后在胶质瘤中的移植情况:用过表达铁蛋白重链(FTH)和萤火虫荧光素酶(FLUC)报告基因的慢病毒转导间充质干细胞,获得FTH和FLUC过表达的间充质干细胞(FTH-FLUC-MSCs)。罹患颅内C6胶质瘤的Wistar大鼠分别接受了FTH-FLUC-间充质干细胞的瘤周、瘤内、动脉内和静脉注射。核磁共振成像(MRI)和BLI对FTH-FLUC-间充质干细胞进行了体内监测:结果:经瘤周、瘤内和动脉内途径注射的FTH-FLUC-间充质干细胞在体内特别向颅内胶质瘤迁移,这一点可通过核磁共振成像和BLI检测到。根据 BLI 信号强度的量化结果,与动脉内注射(30%)和静脉注射(0%)相比,瘤周注射(61%)和瘤内注射(71%)的 FTH-FLUC 间充质干细胞在胶质瘤中的比例明显更高。瘤周注射的FTH-FLUC-间充质干细胞呈逐渐下降趋势,直至注射后11天,仍有约6%的FTH-FLUC-间充质干细胞保留在肿瘤内。与此同时,通过其他途径注射的FTH-FLUC-间充质干细胞数量迅速下降,到注射后第11天,已检测不到任何FTH-FLUC-间充质干细胞:结论:FTH-FLUC-间充质干细胞的瘤周给药具有强大的移植能力,可作为治疗恶性胶质瘤的最佳给药途径。
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.