Expanding the opioid use disorder medication treatment workforce in rural communities through the RCORP initiative.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
C Holly A Andrilla, Sara C Woolcock, Kathleen Meyers, Davis G Patterson
{"title":"Expanding the opioid use disorder medication treatment workforce in rural communities through the RCORP initiative.","authors":"C Holly A Andrilla, Sara C Woolcock, Kathleen Meyers, Davis G Patterson","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Rural Communities Opioid Response Program (RCORP) was funded to help rural communities improve prevention, treatment, and recovery services for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD), including increasing the supply of clinicians with a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) waiver to prescribe buprenorphine, which was required before 2023. This research investigates the impact of RCORP funding on the supply of DEA-waivered clinicians in rural communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 2017-2022 DEA lists of waivered clinicians to assign clinicians to US counties. Using RCORP service area data, we classified rural counties as either being served by an RCORP grantee or not. We calculated the number of counties in each category with a waivered clinician, clinician-to-population ratios, and treatment slot-to-population ratios.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In 2017, 3.7% more of RCORP funded counties had a waivered clinician than non-RCORP counties. RCORP counties also had 1.2 more waivered clinicians per 100,000 population and 57.5 more treatment slots per 100,000 population compared to non-RCORP counties. From 2017 to 2022, these differences more than doubled. The supply of waivered clinicians varied across Census Divisions. In most Census Divisions, a greater percentage of RCORP counties had a waivered clinician as well as more waivered clinicians and treatment slots per population, except for the Pacific Census Division, which had more clinicians and treatment slots per population in non-RCORP counties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study findings suggest that federal investments to expand rural OUD patients' access to care may have been successful, but only if increases in clinician supply translate into greater provision of OUD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12867","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Rural Communities Opioid Response Program (RCORP) was funded to help rural communities improve prevention, treatment, and recovery services for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD), including increasing the supply of clinicians with a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) waiver to prescribe buprenorphine, which was required before 2023. This research investigates the impact of RCORP funding on the supply of DEA-waivered clinicians in rural communities.

Methods: We used 2017-2022 DEA lists of waivered clinicians to assign clinicians to US counties. Using RCORP service area data, we classified rural counties as either being served by an RCORP grantee or not. We calculated the number of counties in each category with a waivered clinician, clinician-to-population ratios, and treatment slot-to-population ratios.

Findings: In 2017, 3.7% more of RCORP funded counties had a waivered clinician than non-RCORP counties. RCORP counties also had 1.2 more waivered clinicians per 100,000 population and 57.5 more treatment slots per 100,000 population compared to non-RCORP counties. From 2017 to 2022, these differences more than doubled. The supply of waivered clinicians varied across Census Divisions. In most Census Divisions, a greater percentage of RCORP counties had a waivered clinician as well as more waivered clinicians and treatment slots per population, except for the Pacific Census Division, which had more clinicians and treatment slots per population in non-RCORP counties.

Conclusions: Study findings suggest that federal investments to expand rural OUD patients' access to care may have been successful, but only if increases in clinician supply translate into greater provision of OUD treatment.

通过 RCORP 计划,扩大农村社区的阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗队伍。
目的:"农村社区阿片类药物应对计划"(RCORP)旨在帮助农村社区改善阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的预防、治疗和康复服务,包括增加获得美国缉毒署(DEA)豁免开具丁丙诺啡处方的临床医生的供应量,这是在 2023 年之前的要求。本研究调查了 RCORP 资金对农村社区 DEA 豁免临床医生供应的影响:我们使用 2017-2022 年 DEA 豁免临床医生名单将临床医生分配到美国各县。利用 RCORP 服务区数据,我们将农村县划分为接受 RCORP 资助者服务或未接受 RCORP 资助者服务。我们计算了每个类别中拥有弃权临床医生的县的数量、临床医生与人口的比率以及治疗名额与人口的比率:2017 年,RCORP 资助的县比非 RCORP 资助的县多 3.7%。与非 RCORP 县相比,RCORP 县每 100,000 人口拥有的放弃治疗的临床医生多 1.2 人,每 100,000 人口拥有的治疗名额多 57.5 个。从 2017 年到 2022 年,这些差异增加了一倍多。各人口普查分区的豁免临床医生供应情况各不相同。在大多数人口普查分区中,RCORP 县拥有弃权临床医生的比例更高,弃权临床医生和每人口治疗名额也更多,但太平洋人口普查分区除外,该分区非 RCORP 县的临床医生和每人口治疗名额更多:研究结果表明,为扩大农村 OUD 患者获得治疗的机会而进行的联邦投资可能是成功的,但前提是临床医生供应的增加必须转化为更多的 OUD 治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信