Sling and forget it? A systematic review of operative versus nonoperative outcomes for scapula fractures.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.042
Haley C Sernandez, John T Riehl, Joshua Fogel
{"title":"Sling and forget it? A systematic review of operative versus nonoperative outcomes for scapula fractures.","authors":"Haley C Sernandez, John T Riehl, Joshua Fogel","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The majority of scapula fractures have historically been treated nonoperatively. The current literature describing patient outcomes following scapula fractures is limited. Our objective was to determine differences in outcomes between operatively and nonoperatively treated scapular fractures. The goal of our study was to provide an updated and comprehensive systematic review for scapula body, neck, and glenoid fractures focusing on several outcomes including union rate, return to work, pain, shoulder active range of motion, strength, functional scores, and any recorded complication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRISMA methodology was followed for this systematic review. Articles were obtained from the PubMed/Medline database using the following search terms: scapula body OR scapula neck OR intra-articular glenoid AND fracture. Additional articles were obtained by searching the bibliographies of included references. Studies were included if they contained clinical data on one or more of our study objectives and contained participants with a scapular body, neck, and/or glenoid fracture who were at least 16 year old. A total of 35 papers, with 822 total cases were included. Studies chosen were assessed for level of evidence and reviewed for data pertaining to the current study objectives. All cases of scapula fractures found throughout the literature were analyzed for outcome data. Outcomes studied included union rate, return to work, pain, shoulder active range of motion, strength, functional scores, and recorded complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overwhelming majority of scapula fractures go on to union. The majority of patients will eventually return to work. Persistent postinjury pain is unfortunately common. Shoulder range of motion and strength are decreased when compared to the contralateral shoulder. Nonoperative glenoid fractures have the lowest reported functional scores. Malunion, need for additional surgeries, and post-traumatic arthritis were the most common complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When treating scapula fractures, orthopedic surgeons must consider the specific fracture pattern, as well as patient specific goals. Risks and benefits of both operative and nonoperative management should be discussed with the patient including the exceptionally low nonunion rate regardless of treatment option and that persistent pain following injury is unfortunately common.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The majority of scapula fractures have historically been treated nonoperatively. The current literature describing patient outcomes following scapula fractures is limited. Our objective was to determine differences in outcomes between operatively and nonoperatively treated scapular fractures. The goal of our study was to provide an updated and comprehensive systematic review for scapula body, neck, and glenoid fractures focusing on several outcomes including union rate, return to work, pain, shoulder active range of motion, strength, functional scores, and any recorded complication.

Methods: The PRISMA methodology was followed for this systematic review. Articles were obtained from the PubMed/Medline database using the following search terms: scapula body OR scapula neck OR intra-articular glenoid AND fracture. Additional articles were obtained by searching the bibliographies of included references. Studies were included if they contained clinical data on one or more of our study objectives and contained participants with a scapular body, neck, and/or glenoid fracture who were at least 16 year old. A total of 35 papers, with 822 total cases were included. Studies chosen were assessed for level of evidence and reviewed for data pertaining to the current study objectives. All cases of scapula fractures found throughout the literature were analyzed for outcome data. Outcomes studied included union rate, return to work, pain, shoulder active range of motion, strength, functional scores, and recorded complications.

Results: The overwhelming majority of scapula fractures go on to union. The majority of patients will eventually return to work. Persistent postinjury pain is unfortunately common. Shoulder range of motion and strength are decreased when compared to the contralateral shoulder. Nonoperative glenoid fractures have the lowest reported functional scores. Malunion, need for additional surgeries, and post-traumatic arthritis were the most common complications.

Conclusion: When treating scapula fractures, orthopedic surgeons must consider the specific fracture pattern, as well as patient specific goals. Risks and benefits of both operative and nonoperative management should be discussed with the patient including the exceptionally low nonunion rate regardless of treatment option and that persistent pain following injury is unfortunately common.

用吊带固定就可以了吗?肩胛骨骨折手术与非手术治疗效果的系统回顾。
背景:肩胛骨骨折历来大多采用非手术治疗。目前描述肩胛骨骨折后患者预后的文献十分有限。我们的目标是确定手术治疗和非手术治疗肩胛骨骨折的疗效差异。我们的研究目标是对肩胛骨体、颈和盂骨折进行最新、全面的系统综述,重点关注几种结果,包括结合率、重返工作岗位、疼痛、肩部主动活动范围、力量、功能评分和任何记录在案的并发症:本系统性综述遵循 PRISMA 方法。文章来自PubMed/Medline数据库,使用以下检索词:肩胛骨体或肩胛骨颈或关节内盂和骨折。其他文章则通过检索纳入参考文献的书目获得。如果研究中包含与我们的一个或多个研究目标相关的临床数据,并包含至少16岁的肩胛骨体、肩胛颈和/或关节内盂骨骨折的参与者,则被纳入研究范围。共纳入了 35 篇论文,共计 822 个病例。我们对所选研究进行了证据等级评估,并审查了与当前研究目标相关的数据。对所有文献中发现的肩胛骨骨折病例进行了结果数据分析。研究结果包括结合率、重返工作岗位、疼痛、肩部主动活动范围、力量、功能评分和记录的并发症:结果:绝大多数肩胛骨骨折都能愈合。结果:绝大多数肩胛骨骨折都能愈合,大多数患者最终都能重返工作岗位。遗憾的是,伤后持续疼痛很常见。与对侧肩部相比,肩部的活动范围和力量都有所下降。据报道,非手术治疗的盂兰盆骨折患者功能评分最低。最常见的并发症是骨折愈合不良、需要再次手术以及创伤后关节炎:在治疗肩胛骨骨折时,骨科医生必须考虑具体的骨折形态以及患者的具体目标。应与患者讨论手术治疗和非手术治疗的风险和益处,包括无论采用哪种治疗方案,非愈合率都非常低,而且不幸的是,受伤后持续疼痛的情况很常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信