Key professional stakeholders roles in promoting older people's autonomy in residential care.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1177/09697330241247321
Tanja Moilanen, Riitta Suhonen, Mari Kangasniemi
{"title":"Key professional stakeholders roles in promoting older people's autonomy in residential care.","authors":"Tanja Moilanen, Riitta Suhonen, Mari Kangasniemi","doi":"10.1177/09697330241247321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older people's autonomy is an ethical and legal principle in everyday residential care, but there is a lack of clarity about the roles and responsibilities of the key professional stakeholder groups involved.</p><p><strong>Research objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify and define the roles and responsibilities of the key professional stakeholder groups involved in promoting older people's autonomy in residential care settings.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>We used a Delphi method with two iterative rounds of online group discussions and collected data from experts in older people's care in Finland in summer 2020. The data were analyzed using deductive-inductive content analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>According to Finnish legislation, this type of research did not need approval from a research ethics committee. Informed consent from the participants was obtained and they were informed about the voluntary nature and confidentiality of the study and their right to withdraw at any time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key professional stakeholders had different roles and responsibilities, but their shared, integrated goal was to achieve older people's autonomy in residential care settings. Their combined roles and responsibilities covered all aspects of promoting older people's autonomy, from care and service planning and daily decision-making to service structures that included ethical competencies and monitoring. Multipronged, variable, coordinated strategies were required to identify, assess, and promote autonomy at different levels of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Key professional stakeholders need to work together to provide an unbroken chain of care that provides older people with autonomy in residential care settings. In future, more knowledge is needed about how to create structures to achieve the shared goal of older people's autonomy in these settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"575-587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241247321","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older people's autonomy is an ethical and legal principle in everyday residential care, but there is a lack of clarity about the roles and responsibilities of the key professional stakeholder groups involved.

Research objectives: This study aimed to identify and define the roles and responsibilities of the key professional stakeholder groups involved in promoting older people's autonomy in residential care settings.

Research design: We used a Delphi method with two iterative rounds of online group discussions and collected data from experts in older people's care in Finland in summer 2020. The data were analyzed using deductive-inductive content analysis methods.

Ethical considerations: According to Finnish legislation, this type of research did not need approval from a research ethics committee. Informed consent from the participants was obtained and they were informed about the voluntary nature and confidentiality of the study and their right to withdraw at any time.

Results: Key professional stakeholders had different roles and responsibilities, but their shared, integrated goal was to achieve older people's autonomy in residential care settings. Their combined roles and responsibilities covered all aspects of promoting older people's autonomy, from care and service planning and daily decision-making to service structures that included ethical competencies and monitoring. Multipronged, variable, coordinated strategies were required to identify, assess, and promote autonomy at different levels of care.

Conclusion: Key professional stakeholders need to work together to provide an unbroken chain of care that provides older people with autonomy in residential care settings. In future, more knowledge is needed about how to create structures to achieve the shared goal of older people's autonomy in these settings.

主要专业利益相关者在促进寄宿护理机构中老年人自主性方面的作用。
研究背景:老年人的自主权是日常寄宿护理中的一项道德和法律原则,但相关主要专业利益群体的角色和责任并不明确:研究目的:本研究旨在确定和界定主要专业利益相关群体在促进住宿护理环境中的老年人自主权方面的角色和责任:我们采用德尔菲法,通过两轮反复的在线小组讨论,于 2020 年夏季从芬兰老年人护理专家那里收集了数据。采用演绎-归纳内容分析法对数据进行分析:根据芬兰法律,此类研究无需获得研究伦理委员会的批准。研究获得了参与者的知情同意,并告知他们研究的自愿性和保密性,以及他们随时退出的权利:主要专业利益相关者的角色和职责各不相同,但他们共同的综合目标是实现老年人在住宿护理环境中的自主权。他们的共同角色和责任涵盖了促进老年人自主的方方面面,从护理和服务规划、日常决策到包括道德能力和监督在内的服务结构。需要采取多管齐下、可变、协调的策略,在不同的护理层面识别、评估和促进自主性:主要的专业利益相关者需要通力合作,以提供一个完整的护理链,从而在住宿护理环境中为老年人提供自主权。今后,我们需要更多的知识来了解如何在这些环境中创建结构,以实现老年人自主的共同目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信