Feasibility of dose calculation for treatment plans using electron density maps from a novel dual-layer detector spectral CT simulator.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Qizhen Zhu, Shuoyang Wei, Zhiqun Wang, Haoran Xu, Bing Zhou, Huiying Qu, Mingming Nie, Ning Guo, Wenshuai Wang, Bo Yang, Jie Qiu
{"title":"Feasibility of dose calculation for treatment plans using electron density maps from a novel dual-layer detector spectral CT simulator.","authors":"Qizhen Zhu, Shuoyang Wei, Zhiqun Wang, Haoran Xu, Bing Zhou, Huiying Qu, Mingming Nie, Ning Guo, Wenshuai Wang, Bo Yang, Jie Qiu","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02479-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional single-energy CT can only provide a raw estimation of electron density (ED) for dose calculation by developing a calibration curve that simply maps the HU values to ED values through their correlations. Spectral CT, also known as dual-energy CT (DECT) or multi-energy CT, can generate a series of quantitative maps, such as ED maps. Using spectral CT for radiotherapy simulations can directly acquire ED information without developing specific calibration curves. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of utilizing electron density (ED) maps generated by a novel dual-layer detector spectral CT simulator for dose calculation in radiotherapy treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>30 patients from head&neck, chest, and pelvic treatment sites were selected retrospectively, and all of them underwent spectral CT simulation. Treatment plans based on conventional CT images were transplanted to ED maps with the same structure set, including planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs), and the dose distributions were then recalculated. The differences in dose and volume histogram (DVH) parameters of the PTV and OARs between the two types of plans were analyzed and compared. Besides, gamma analysis between these plans was performed by using MEPHYSTO Navigator software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of PTV, the homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), D<sub>2%</sub>, D<sub>98%</sub>, and D<sub>mean</sub> showed no significant difference between conventional plans and ED plans. For OARs, statistically significant differences were observed in parotids D<sub>50%</sub>, brainstem in head&neck plans, spinal cord in chest plans and rectum D<sub>50%</sub> in pelvic plans, whereas the variance remained minor. For the rest, the DVH parameters exhibited no significant difference between conventional plans and ED plans. All of the mean gamma passing rates (GPRs) of gamma analysis were higher than 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to conventional treatment plans relying on CT images, plans utilizing ED maps demonstrated similar dosimetric quality. However, the latter approach enables direct utilization in dose calculation without the requirements of establishing and selecting a specific Hounsfield unit (HU) to ED calibration curve, providing an advantage in clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02479-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conventional single-energy CT can only provide a raw estimation of electron density (ED) for dose calculation by developing a calibration curve that simply maps the HU values to ED values through their correlations. Spectral CT, also known as dual-energy CT (DECT) or multi-energy CT, can generate a series of quantitative maps, such as ED maps. Using spectral CT for radiotherapy simulations can directly acquire ED information without developing specific calibration curves. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of utilizing electron density (ED) maps generated by a novel dual-layer detector spectral CT simulator for dose calculation in radiotherapy treatment plans.

Methods: 30 patients from head&neck, chest, and pelvic treatment sites were selected retrospectively, and all of them underwent spectral CT simulation. Treatment plans based on conventional CT images were transplanted to ED maps with the same structure set, including planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs), and the dose distributions were then recalculated. The differences in dose and volume histogram (DVH) parameters of the PTV and OARs between the two types of plans were analyzed and compared. Besides, gamma analysis between these plans was performed by using MEPHYSTO Navigator software.

Results: In terms of PTV, the homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), D2%, D98%, and Dmean showed no significant difference between conventional plans and ED plans. For OARs, statistically significant differences were observed in parotids D50%, brainstem in head&neck plans, spinal cord in chest plans and rectum D50% in pelvic plans, whereas the variance remained minor. For the rest, the DVH parameters exhibited no significant difference between conventional plans and ED plans. All of the mean gamma passing rates (GPRs) of gamma analysis were higher than 90%.

Conclusion: Compared to conventional treatment plans relying on CT images, plans utilizing ED maps demonstrated similar dosimetric quality. However, the latter approach enables direct utilization in dose calculation without the requirements of establishing and selecting a specific Hounsfield unit (HU) to ED calibration curve, providing an advantage in clinical applications.

利用新型双层探测器光谱 CT 模拟器的电子密度图计算治疗方案剂量的可行性。
背景:传统的单能量 CT 只能通过制定校准曲线,简单地将 HU 值映射到 ED 值,从而提供用于剂量计算的原始电子密度(ED)估算值。光谱 CT(又称双能 CT(DECT)或多能 CT)可生成一系列定量图,如 ED 图。使用光谱 CT 进行放射治疗模拟可直接获取 ED 信息,而无需开发特定的校准曲线。本研究的目的是评估利用新型双层探测器光谱 CT 模拟器生成的电子密度(ED)图计算放疗治疗计划剂量的可行性。将基于传统 CT 图像的治疗计划移植到具有相同结构集(包括计划靶体积(PTV)和危险器官(OAR))的 ED 地图上,然后重新计算剂量分布。分析并比较了两种计划的 PTV 和 OAR 的剂量和体积直方图(DVH)参数差异。此外,还使用 MEPHYSTO Navigator 软件对这些计划进行了伽马分析:结果:在 PTV 方面,传统计划与 ED 计划的同质性指数(HI)、梯度指数(GI)、D2%、D98% 和 Dmean 均无显著差异。就 OAR 而言,腮腺 D50%、头颈部计划中的脑干、胸部计划中的脊髓和盆腔计划中的直肠 D50% 在统计学上有显著差异,但差异仍然很小。其余的 DVH 参数在传统计划和 ED 计划之间没有明显差异。伽马分析的平均伽马通过率(GPR)均高于90%:结论:与依靠 CT 图像的传统治疗计划相比,利用 ED 地图的计划显示出相似的剂量质量。不过,后一种方法可以直接用于剂量计算,而无需建立和选择特定的Hounsfield单位(HU)到ED校准曲线,在临床应用中具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信