Nursing postgraduates learning experience of professional curriculum in China: A qualitative study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.2244
Hongmei Jiang, Ting Zhang, Suofei Zhang, Huijuan Ma, Yu Luo
{"title":"Nursing postgraduates learning experience of professional curriculum in China: A qualitative study.","authors":"Hongmei Jiang, Ting Zhang, Suofei Zhang, Huijuan Ma, Yu Luo","doi":"10.1002/nop2.2244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study adopted the qualitative research method, aiming to explore the learning experience of nursing graduate professional curricula in China from the perspective of students and provided a basis for the continuous improvement of nursing graduate training.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A purposive sampling method was employed to conduct semi-structured in-depth interviews with 14 nursing master's students enrolled in professional curricula from September 03, 2021, to December 8, 2022. The Colaizzi seven-step analysis method was utilized for data analysis, summarization and extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes emerged from the study findings: (i) The study of professional curricula is the cornerstone of scientific research work, but it is relatively boring; (ii) The teaching methods and assessment methods of postgraduate education need to be diversified; (iii) The postgraduate education needs to increase the study time of specialized courses and highlight the specialty characteristics; (iv) the study of professional curricula can enhance the comprehensive ability of postgraduate students.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study of professional curricula for post-graduate nursing students plays an important role in the development of post-graduate research and can statistically significant improve their comprehensive ability, but there are some problems such as boring courses, single teaching assessment methods and insufficient time. In the future teaching reform, it is necessary to highlight the specialty characteristics of nursing scientific research, optimize curriculum education and improve students' scientific research knowledge and thinking.</p><p><strong>Patient and public contributions: </strong>We thank all participants for their valuable input throughout the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11269364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study adopted the qualitative research method, aiming to explore the learning experience of nursing graduate professional curricula in China from the perspective of students and provided a basis for the continuous improvement of nursing graduate training.

Design: A qualitative study.

Methods: A purposive sampling method was employed to conduct semi-structured in-depth interviews with 14 nursing master's students enrolled in professional curricula from September 03, 2021, to December 8, 2022. The Colaizzi seven-step analysis method was utilized for data analysis, summarization and extraction.

Results: Four themes emerged from the study findings: (i) The study of professional curricula is the cornerstone of scientific research work, but it is relatively boring; (ii) The teaching methods and assessment methods of postgraduate education need to be diversified; (iii) The postgraduate education needs to increase the study time of specialized courses and highlight the specialty characteristics; (iv) the study of professional curricula can enhance the comprehensive ability of postgraduate students.

Conclusion: The study of professional curricula for post-graduate nursing students plays an important role in the development of post-graduate research and can statistically significant improve their comprehensive ability, but there are some problems such as boring courses, single teaching assessment methods and insufficient time. In the future teaching reform, it is necessary to highlight the specialty characteristics of nursing scientific research, optimize curriculum education and improve students' scientific research knowledge and thinking.

Patient and public contributions: We thank all participants for their valuable input throughout the study.

中国护理研究生的专业课程学习经验:定性研究。
目的:本研究采用质性研究方法,旨在从学生的视角探讨中国护理研究生专业课程的学习经验,为护理研究生培养的持续改进提供依据:设计:定性研究:采用目的取样法,对2021年9月3日至2022年12月8日在读的14名专业课程护理硕士研究生进行半结构化深度访谈。采用 Colaizzi 七步分析法进行数据分析、总结和提取:研究结果得出四个主题:①专业课程的学习是科研工作的基石,但相对枯燥;②研究生教育的教学方法和考核方式需要多样化;③研究生教育需要增加专业课程的学习时间,突出专业特色;④专业课程的学习可以提高研究生的综合能力:护理专业研究生的专业课程学习对研究生的科研发展具有重要作用,从统计学上看,能显著提高研究生的综合能力,但也存在一些问题,如课程枯燥、教学考核方式单一、时间不足等。在今后的教学改革中,要突出护理科研的专科特色,优化课程教育,提高学生的科研知识和科研思维:感谢所有参与者在整个研究过程中提出的宝贵意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信