Relationships between sex and in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute cardiogenic shock receiving mechanical circulatory support

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nadhem Abdallah , Abdilahi Mohamoud , Talal Almasri , Meriam Abdallah
{"title":"Relationships between sex and in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute cardiogenic shock receiving mechanical circulatory support","authors":"Nadhem Abdallah ,&nbsp;Abdilahi Mohamoud ,&nbsp;Talal Almasri ,&nbsp;Meriam Abdallah","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in women. Despite this there is a paucity of data on the impact of sex on utilization and outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) in patients hospitalized with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Cardiogenic Shock (CS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We examined the 2016–2019 National Inpatient Sample database to identify cases of AMI-CS. Men were used as our control group, while women comprised our cohort. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the use of tMCS including; left ventricular assist device (LVAD) use, Impella use, and Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) use, length of stay (LOS) and total hospitalization cost (THC). Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among patients hospitalized for AMI (<em>N</em> = 2,622,939), 37.7 % were Female. A Female sex was associated with a higher inpatient mortality (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.06, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), a lower likelihood of LVAD use (2.3 % vs. 2.9 % and <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), IABP use (3.0 % vs. 4.4 % and <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), Impella use (1.0 % vs. 1.5 % and <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), a longer mean LOS (4.4 vs 4.3 days and p &lt; 0.001) and lower THC ($88,097 vs. $104,101, p &lt; 0.001) compared to male patients for AMI-CS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Female patients admitted for AMI-CS were less likely to receive tMCS despite a higher mortality rate and a slightly longer LOS compared to male patients. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings and elucidate clearer causality for such disparities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":"73 ","pages":"Pages 76-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553838924005943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in women. Despite this there is a paucity of data on the impact of sex on utilization and outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) in patients hospitalized with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Cardiogenic Shock (CS).

Methods

We examined the 2016–2019 National Inpatient Sample database to identify cases of AMI-CS. Men were used as our control group, while women comprised our cohort. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the use of tMCS including; left ventricular assist device (LVAD) use, Impella use, and Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) use, length of stay (LOS) and total hospitalization cost (THC). Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders.

Results

Among patients hospitalized for AMI (N = 2,622,939), 37.7 % were Female. A Female sex was associated with a higher inpatient mortality (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.06, p < 0.001), a lower likelihood of LVAD use (2.3 % vs. 2.9 % and p < 0.001), IABP use (3.0 % vs. 4.4 % and p < 0.001), Impella use (1.0 % vs. 1.5 % and p < 0.001), a longer mean LOS (4.4 vs 4.3 days and p < 0.001) and lower THC ($88,097 vs. $104,101, p < 0.001) compared to male patients for AMI-CS.

Conclusion

Female patients admitted for AMI-CS were less likely to receive tMCS despite a higher mortality rate and a slightly longer LOS compared to male patients. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings and elucidate clearer causality for such disparities.
接受机械循环支持的急性心源性休克患者的性别与院内预后之间的关系。
背景:心血管疾病是导致女性死亡的主要原因。尽管如此,有关性别对急性心肌梗死(AMI)心源性休克(CS)住院患者临时机械循环支持(tMCS)的使用和结果的影响的数据仍然很少:我们研究了 2016-2019 年全国住院患者抽样数据库,以确定 AMI-CS 病例。男性为对照组,女性为队列组。主要结果是院内死亡率。次要结果包括 tMCS 的使用,包括左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的使用、Impella 的使用和主动脉内球囊反搏泵(IABP)的使用、住院时间(LOS)和住院总费用(THC)。多变量线性回归和逻辑回归模型用于调整混杂因素:在因急性心肌梗死住院的患者(2622939 人)中,37.7% 为女性。女性性别与较高的住院死亡率相关(调整后 OR [aOR] 1.06,P 结论:女性与较高的住院死亡率相关:与男性患者相比,女性急性心肌梗死-冠心病患者的死亡率较高,住院时间稍长,但接受 tMCS 的可能性较低。有必要开展进一步研究,以证实这些发现,并更清楚地阐明这种差异的因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信